非产毒性艰难梭菌定植的性别差异和随后艰难梭菌感染的风险。

Mukil Natarajan, Mary Am Rogers, Jacob Bundy, Dejan Micic, Seth T Walk, Kavitha Santhosh, Krishna Rao, Spencer Winters, Vincent B Young, David M Aronoff
{"title":"非产毒性艰难梭菌定植的性别差异和随后艰难梭菌感染的风险。","authors":"Mukil Natarajan,&nbsp;Mary Am Rogers,&nbsp;Jacob Bundy,&nbsp;Dejan Micic,&nbsp;Seth T Walk,&nbsp;Kavitha Santhosh,&nbsp;Krishna Rao,&nbsp;Spencer Winters,&nbsp;Vincent B Young,&nbsp;David M Aronoff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies suggest that colonization with non-toxigenic <i>Clostridium difficile</i> may protect against toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> infection (CDI), yet most of the studies were conducted in men. Therefore, we conducted a study to examine this hypothesis in both genders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n=1492) were classified by disease status at baseline and observed for 1 year. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate CDI rates within 8 weeks post-baseline (short-term) and from 8 weeks to 1 year (long-term follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During short-term follow-up, CDI rates were 5 times greater in females with non-toxigenic <i>Clostridium difficile</i> compared to females without <i>C. difficile</i> (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.13; 95% CI: 1.47-17.83). The comparable HR in males was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.04-4.43). During long term follow-up, CDI rates were similar in those with non-toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> and those without <i>C. difficile</i> at baseline, for both females and males. Mortality rates were significantly lower for patients colonized by non-toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> than those with toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> at baseline, for both genders combined (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.92) and were similar to those with no <i>C. difficile</i> at baseline (HR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.43-1.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were gender differences in the short-term risk of CDI. Mortality was similar for patients colonized with non-toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> and patients without <i>C. difficile</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":72628,"journal":{"name":"Clinical research in infectious diseases","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508598/pdf/nihms871535.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Non-Toxigenic <i>Clostridium difficile</i> Colonization and Risk of Subsequent <i>C. difficile Infection</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Mukil Natarajan,&nbsp;Mary Am Rogers,&nbsp;Jacob Bundy,&nbsp;Dejan Micic,&nbsp;Seth T Walk,&nbsp;Kavitha Santhosh,&nbsp;Krishna Rao,&nbsp;Spencer Winters,&nbsp;Vincent B Young,&nbsp;David M Aronoff\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies suggest that colonization with non-toxigenic <i>Clostridium difficile</i> may protect against toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> infection (CDI), yet most of the studies were conducted in men. Therefore, we conducted a study to examine this hypothesis in both genders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n=1492) were classified by disease status at baseline and observed for 1 year. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate CDI rates within 8 weeks post-baseline (short-term) and from 8 weeks to 1 year (long-term follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During short-term follow-up, CDI rates were 5 times greater in females with non-toxigenic <i>Clostridium difficile</i> compared to females without <i>C. difficile</i> (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.13; 95% CI: 1.47-17.83). The comparable HR in males was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.04-4.43). During long term follow-up, CDI rates were similar in those with non-toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> and those without <i>C. difficile</i> at baseline, for both females and males. Mortality rates were significantly lower for patients colonized by non-toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> than those with toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> at baseline, for both genders combined (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.92) and were similar to those with no <i>C. difficile</i> at baseline (HR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.43-1.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were gender differences in the short-term risk of CDI. Mortality was similar for patients colonized with non-toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> and patients without <i>C. difficile</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical research in infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5508598/pdf/nihms871535.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical research in infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical research in infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先前的研究表明,非产毒性艰难梭菌定殖可预防产毒性艰难梭菌感染(CDI),但大多数研究都是在男性中进行的。因此,我们进行了一项研究,在两性中检验这一假设。方法:1492例患者在基线时按疾病状态分类,观察1年。采用Cox比例风险回归评估基线后8周(短期)和8周至1年(长期随访)的CDI发生率。结果:在短期随访中,携带非产毒艰难梭菌的女性的CDI发生率是未携带艰难梭菌的女性的5倍(风险比(HR) = 5.13;95% ci: 1.47-17.83)。男性的可比HR为0.44 (95% CI: 0.04-4.43)。在长期随访中,在基线时,无论是女性还是男性,非产毒性艰难梭菌患者和无艰难梭菌患者的CDI率相似。在基线时,非产毒艰难梭菌定殖的患者死亡率显著低于产毒艰难梭菌定殖的患者(HR=0.51;95% CI: 0.28-0.92),与基线时无艰难梭菌的患者相似(HR=0.78;95% ci: 0.43-1.41)。结论:CDI的短期风险存在性别差异。非产毒艰难梭菌定殖患者和无艰难梭菌定殖患者的死亡率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gender Differences in Non-Toxigenic <i>Clostridium difficile</i> Colonization and Risk of Subsequent <i>C. difficile Infection</i>.

Gender Differences in Non-Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Colonization and Risk of Subsequent C. difficile Infection.

Objectives: Previous studies suggest that colonization with non-toxigenic Clostridium difficile may protect against toxigenic C. difficile infection (CDI), yet most of the studies were conducted in men. Therefore, we conducted a study to examine this hypothesis in both genders.

Methods: Patients (n=1492) were classified by disease status at baseline and observed for 1 year. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate CDI rates within 8 weeks post-baseline (short-term) and from 8 weeks to 1 year (long-term follow-up).

Results: During short-term follow-up, CDI rates were 5 times greater in females with non-toxigenic Clostridium difficile compared to females without C. difficile (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.13; 95% CI: 1.47-17.83). The comparable HR in males was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.04-4.43). During long term follow-up, CDI rates were similar in those with non-toxigenic C. difficile and those without C. difficile at baseline, for both females and males. Mortality rates were significantly lower for patients colonized by non-toxigenic C. difficile than those with toxigenic C. difficile at baseline, for both genders combined (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.92) and were similar to those with no C. difficile at baseline (HR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.43-1.41).

Conclusions: There were gender differences in the short-term risk of CDI. Mortality was similar for patients colonized with non-toxigenic C. difficile and patients without C. difficile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信