治疗师驱动的前列腺MR-Linac自适应放疗的实践培训策略

Q1 Nursing
Winnie Li , Jerusha Padayachee , Inmaculada Navarro , Jeff Winter , Jennifer Dang , Srinivas Raman , Vickie Kong , Alejandro Berlin , Charles Catton , Rachel Glicksman , Victor Malkov , Andrew McPartlin , Kaushik Kataki , Patricia Lindsay , Peter Chung
{"title":"治疗师驱动的前列腺MR-Linac自适应放疗的实践培训策略","authors":"Winnie Li ,&nbsp;Jerusha Padayachee ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Navarro ,&nbsp;Jeff Winter ,&nbsp;Jennifer Dang ,&nbsp;Srinivas Raman ,&nbsp;Vickie Kong ,&nbsp;Alejandro Berlin ,&nbsp;Charles Catton ,&nbsp;Rachel Glicksman ,&nbsp;Victor Malkov ,&nbsp;Andrew McPartlin ,&nbsp;Kaushik Kataki ,&nbsp;Patricia Lindsay ,&nbsp;Peter Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To develop a practice-based training strategy to transition from radiation oncologist to therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>In phase 1, 7 therapists independently contoured the prostate and organs-at-risk on T2-weighted MR images from 11 previously treated MR-Linac prostate patients. Contours were evaluated quantitatively (i.e. Dice similarity coefficient [DSC] calculated against oncologist generated online contours) and qualitatively (i.e. oncologist using a 5-point Likert scale; a score ≥ 4 was deemed a pass, a 90% pass rate was required to proceed to the next phase). Phase 2 consisted of supervised online workflow with therapists required no intervention from the oncologist on 10 total cases to advance. Phase 3 involved unsupervised therapist-driven workflow, with offline support from oncologists prior to the next fraction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In phase 1, the mean DSC was 0.92 (range 0.85–0.97), and mean Likert score was 3.7 for the prostate. Five therapists did not attain a pass rate (3–5 cases with prostate contour score &lt; 4), underwent follow-up one-on-one review, and performed contours on a further training set (n = 5). Each participant completed a median of 12 (range 10–13) cases in phase 2; of 82 cases, minor direction were required from the oncologist on 5 regarding target contouring. Radiation oncologists reviewed 179 treatment fractions in phase 3, and deemed 5 cases acceptable but with suggestions for next fraction; all other cases were accepted without suggestions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A training stepwise program was developed and successfully implemented to enable a therapist-driven workflow for online prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/21/main.PMC10230256.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice-based training strategy for therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Li ,&nbsp;Jerusha Padayachee ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Navarro ,&nbsp;Jeff Winter ,&nbsp;Jennifer Dang ,&nbsp;Srinivas Raman ,&nbsp;Vickie Kong ,&nbsp;Alejandro Berlin ,&nbsp;Charles Catton ,&nbsp;Rachel Glicksman ,&nbsp;Victor Malkov ,&nbsp;Andrew McPartlin ,&nbsp;Kaushik Kataki ,&nbsp;Patricia Lindsay ,&nbsp;Peter Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To develop a practice-based training strategy to transition from radiation oncologist to therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>In phase 1, 7 therapists independently contoured the prostate and organs-at-risk on T2-weighted MR images from 11 previously treated MR-Linac prostate patients. Contours were evaluated quantitatively (i.e. Dice similarity coefficient [DSC] calculated against oncologist generated online contours) and qualitatively (i.e. oncologist using a 5-point Likert scale; a score ≥ 4 was deemed a pass, a 90% pass rate was required to proceed to the next phase). Phase 2 consisted of supervised online workflow with therapists required no intervention from the oncologist on 10 total cases to advance. Phase 3 involved unsupervised therapist-driven workflow, with offline support from oncologists prior to the next fraction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In phase 1, the mean DSC was 0.92 (range 0.85–0.97), and mean Likert score was 3.7 for the prostate. Five therapists did not attain a pass rate (3–5 cases with prostate contour score &lt; 4), underwent follow-up one-on-one review, and performed contours on a further training set (n = 5). Each participant completed a median of 12 (range 10–13) cases in phase 2; of 82 cases, minor direction were required from the oncologist on 5 regarding target contouring. Radiation oncologists reviewed 179 treatment fractions in phase 3, and deemed 5 cases acceptable but with suggestions for next fraction; all other cases were accepted without suggestions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A training stepwise program was developed and successfully implemented to enable a therapist-driven workflow for online prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/21/main.PMC10230256.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立一套以实践为基础的培训策略,以实现从放射肿瘤学家到治疗师驱动的前列腺MR-Linac适应性放疗的转变。方法和材料在第1期中,7名治疗师独立绘制了11名先前治疗过的MR- linac前列腺患者的t2加权MR图像上的前列腺和危险器官的轮廓。对轮廓进行定量评估(即根据肿瘤学家生成的在线轮廓计算骰子相似系数[DSC])和定性评估(即肿瘤学家使用5点李克特量表;分数≥4被认为是通过,通过率达到90%才能进入下一阶段)。第二阶段包括有监督的在线工作流程,治疗师不需要肿瘤学家的干预,总共有10个病例可以推进。第三阶段涉及无监督的治疗师驱动的工作流程,在接下来的部分之前有肿瘤学家的离线支持。结果1期平均DSC为0.92(范围0.85-0.97),前列腺平均Likert评分为3.7。5名治疗师没有达到通过率(3-5例前列腺轮廓评分<4),接受一对一的随访评估,并对进一步的训练集(n = 5)进行轮廓分析。在第二阶段,每位参与者完成的中位数为12例(范围为10-13);在82例病例中,有5例需要肿瘤学家对目标轮廓进行次要指导。放射肿瘤学家回顾了第三阶段的179个治疗方案,认为5例可以接受,但对下一个方案提出了建议;所有其他的案例都被接受了,没有任何建议。结论制定并成功实施了逐步培训计划,使在线前列腺MR-Linac自适应放疗成为治疗师驱动的工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Practice-based training strategy for therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy

Practice-based training strategy for therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy

Practice-based training strategy for therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy

Practice-based training strategy for therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy

Purpose

To develop a practice-based training strategy to transition from radiation oncologist to therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy.

Methods and materials

In phase 1, 7 therapists independently contoured the prostate and organs-at-risk on T2-weighted MR images from 11 previously treated MR-Linac prostate patients. Contours were evaluated quantitatively (i.e. Dice similarity coefficient [DSC] calculated against oncologist generated online contours) and qualitatively (i.e. oncologist using a 5-point Likert scale; a score ≥ 4 was deemed a pass, a 90% pass rate was required to proceed to the next phase). Phase 2 consisted of supervised online workflow with therapists required no intervention from the oncologist on 10 total cases to advance. Phase 3 involved unsupervised therapist-driven workflow, with offline support from oncologists prior to the next fraction.

Results

In phase 1, the mean DSC was 0.92 (range 0.85–0.97), and mean Likert score was 3.7 for the prostate. Five therapists did not attain a pass rate (3–5 cases with prostate contour score < 4), underwent follow-up one-on-one review, and performed contours on a further training set (n = 5). Each participant completed a median of 12 (range 10–13) cases in phase 2; of 82 cases, minor direction were required from the oncologist on 5 regarding target contouring. Radiation oncologists reviewed 179 treatment fractions in phase 3, and deemed 5 cases acceptable but with suggestions for next fraction; all other cases were accepted without suggestions.

Conclusion

A training stepwise program was developed and successfully implemented to enable a therapist-driven workflow for online prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信