Suqing Li, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Sechiv Jugnundan, Gary May, Norman Marcon, Jeffrey Mosko, Christopher Teshima
{"title":"居住在家庭收入中位数以下地区对晚期巴雷特食管患者预后的影响。","authors":"Suqing Li, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Sechiv Jugnundan, Gary May, Norman Marcon, Jeffrey Mosko, Christopher Teshima","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Low socioeconomic (SES) status adversely impacts care and outcomes in patients with EAC, but this has not been evaluated in BE. As the treatment of BE is similarly intensive, we aimed to evaluate the effect of SES on achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM), dysplasia (CE-D) and development of invasive EAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was a retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018, referred for BE-associated high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma were included. Pre, intra and post-procedural data were collected. Household income data was collected from the 2016 census based on postal code region. Patients were divided into income groups relative to the 2016 median household income in Ontario. Multivariate regression was performed for outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and fifty-nine patients were included. Rate of CE-IM was similar between income groups. Fifty-five per cent (<i>n</i> = 144/264) versus 65% (<i>n</i> = 48/264) in the below and above-income groups achieved CE-D, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.02. Eighteen per cent (<i>n</i> = 48/264) versus 11% (<i>n</i> = 22/195) were found to have invasive EAC during their treatment course in below and above-income groups, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.04. Residing in a below-median-income district was associated with developing invasive EAC (Odds Ratio, [OR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 3.35) and failure to achieve CE-D (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residing in low-income districts is associated with worse outcomes in patients with advanced BE. Further research is needed to guide future initiatives to address the potential impact of SES barriers in the optimal care of BE.</p>","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"6 4","pages":"137-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Residing in Below Median Household Income Districts on Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Barrett's Esophagus.\",\"authors\":\"Suqing Li, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Sechiv Jugnundan, Gary May, Norman Marcon, Jeffrey Mosko, Christopher Teshima\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jcag/gwad018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Low socioeconomic (SES) status adversely impacts care and outcomes in patients with EAC, but this has not been evaluated in BE. As the treatment of BE is similarly intensive, we aimed to evaluate the effect of SES on achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM), dysplasia (CE-D) and development of invasive EAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was a retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018, referred for BE-associated high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma were included. Pre, intra and post-procedural data were collected. Household income data was collected from the 2016 census based on postal code region. Patients were divided into income groups relative to the 2016 median household income in Ontario. Multivariate regression was performed for outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and fifty-nine patients were included. Rate of CE-IM was similar between income groups. Fifty-five per cent (<i>n</i> = 144/264) versus 65% (<i>n</i> = 48/264) in the below and above-income groups achieved CE-D, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.02. Eighteen per cent (<i>n</i> = 48/264) versus 11% (<i>n</i> = 22/195) were found to have invasive EAC during their treatment course in below and above-income groups, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.04. Residing in a below-median-income district was associated with developing invasive EAC (Odds Ratio, [OR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 3.35) and failure to achieve CE-D (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residing in low-income districts is associated with worse outcomes in patients with advanced BE. Further research is needed to guide future initiatives to address the potential impact of SES barriers in the optimal care of BE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"137-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10395662/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Barrett食管(BE)是食管腺癌(EAC)的一种癌前病变。低社会经济地位(SES)对EAC患者的护理和预后有不利影响,但这在BE中尚未得到评估。由于BE的治疗强度相似,我们的目的是评估SES在完全根除肠上皮化生(CE-IM)、不典型增生(CE-D)和发生侵袭性EAC方面的效果。方法:本研究为回顾性队列研究。纳入了2010年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间因be相关的高级别不典型增生或粘膜内腺癌而转诊的连续患者。收集手术前、手术中和手术后数据。家庭收入数据收集自2016年基于邮政编码地区的人口普查。根据安大略省2016年家庭收入中位数,将患者分为收入组。对感兴趣的结果进行多元回归。结果:共纳入459例患者。不同收入群体的CE-IM率相似。收入以下和收入以上群体分别有55% (n = 144/264)和65% (n = 48/264)达到CE-D, P = 0.02。在低收入组和高收入组中,分别有18% (n = 48/264)和11% (n = 22/195)在治疗过程中发现有创性EAC, P = 0.04。居住在中低收入地区与发生侵袭性EAC(优势比[OR] 1.84, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.01至3.35)和未能实现CE-D (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42至0.97)相关。结论:居住在低收入地区的晚期BE患者预后较差。需要进一步的研究来指导未来的举措,以解决SES障碍对BE的最佳护理的潜在影响。
Impact of Residing in Below Median Household Income Districts on Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Barrett's Esophagus.
Background: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Low socioeconomic (SES) status adversely impacts care and outcomes in patients with EAC, but this has not been evaluated in BE. As the treatment of BE is similarly intensive, we aimed to evaluate the effect of SES on achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM), dysplasia (CE-D) and development of invasive EAC.
Methods: Our study was a retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018, referred for BE-associated high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma were included. Pre, intra and post-procedural data were collected. Household income data was collected from the 2016 census based on postal code region. Patients were divided into income groups relative to the 2016 median household income in Ontario. Multivariate regression was performed for outcomes of interest.
Results: Four hundred and fifty-nine patients were included. Rate of CE-IM was similar between income groups. Fifty-five per cent (n = 144/264) versus 65% (n = 48/264) in the below and above-income groups achieved CE-D, respectively, P = 0.02. Eighteen per cent (n = 48/264) versus 11% (n = 22/195) were found to have invasive EAC during their treatment course in below and above-income groups, respectively, P = 0.04. Residing in a below-median-income district was associated with developing invasive EAC (Odds Ratio, [OR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 3.35) and failure to achieve CE-D (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.97).
Conclusions: Residing in low-income districts is associated with worse outcomes in patients with advanced BE. Further research is needed to guide future initiatives to address the potential impact of SES barriers in the optimal care of BE.