肌电刺激对运动和训练运动员表现参数的影响:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Florian Micke, Steffen Held, Jessica Lindenthal, Lars Donath
{"title":"肌电刺激对运动和训练运动员表现参数的影响:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Florian Micke,&nbsp;Steffen Held,&nbsp;Jessica Lindenthal,&nbsp;Lars Donath","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2107437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different electromyostimulation (EMS) interventions on performance parameters in athletes. The research was conducted until May 2021 using the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and SPORTDiscus for studies with the following inclusion criteria: (a) controlled trials, (b) EMS trials with at least one exercise and/or control group, (c) strength and/or jump and/or sprint and/or aerobic capacity parameter as outcome (d) sportive/trained subjects. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and random effects models were calculated. Thirty-six studies with 1.092 participants were selected and 4 different networks (strength, jump, sprint, aerobic capacity) were built. A ranking of different exercise methods was achieved. The highest effects for pairwise comparisons against the reference control \"active control\" were found for a combination of resistance training with superimposed EMS and additional jump training (outcome strength: 4.43 SMD [2.15; 6.70 CI]; outcome jump: 3.14 SMD [1.80; 4.49 CI]), jump training with superimposed whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) (outcome sprint: 1.65 SMD [0.67; 2.63 CI]) and high intensity bodyweight resistance training with superimposed WB-EMS (outcome aerobic capacity: 0.83 SMD [-0.49; 2.16 CI]). These findings indicate that the choice of EMS-specific factors such as the application mode, the combination with voluntary activation, and the selection of stimulation protocols has an impact on the magnitude of the effects and should therefore be carefully considered, especially in athletes. Superimposed EMS with relatively low volume, high intensity and outcome-specific movement patterns appeared to positively influence adaptations in athletes.<b>Highlights</b>Key performance parameters such as maximal strength, jump height and sprint time can be increased by adequate EMS intervention programs in already well-trained athletes.The effectiveness of EMS training in athletes is highly dependent on the selected EMS method. Volume, intensity, exercise and movement specificity play a crucial role for the efficiency of the training.The most effective option for athletes appears to be a combination of superimposed EMS with relatively low EMS volume, high intensity, and movement-specific exercise pattern.</p>","PeriodicalId":12061,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sport Science","volume":"23 8","pages":"1570-1580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of electromyostimulation on performance parameters in sportive and trained athletes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Micke,&nbsp;Steffen Held,&nbsp;Jessica Lindenthal,&nbsp;Lars Donath\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17461391.2022.2107437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different electromyostimulation (EMS) interventions on performance parameters in athletes. The research was conducted until May 2021 using the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and SPORTDiscus for studies with the following inclusion criteria: (a) controlled trials, (b) EMS trials with at least one exercise and/or control group, (c) strength and/or jump and/or sprint and/or aerobic capacity parameter as outcome (d) sportive/trained subjects. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and random effects models were calculated. Thirty-six studies with 1.092 participants were selected and 4 different networks (strength, jump, sprint, aerobic capacity) were built. A ranking of different exercise methods was achieved. The highest effects for pairwise comparisons against the reference control \\\"active control\\\" were found for a combination of resistance training with superimposed EMS and additional jump training (outcome strength: 4.43 SMD [2.15; 6.70 CI]; outcome jump: 3.14 SMD [1.80; 4.49 CI]), jump training with superimposed whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) (outcome sprint: 1.65 SMD [0.67; 2.63 CI]) and high intensity bodyweight resistance training with superimposed WB-EMS (outcome aerobic capacity: 0.83 SMD [-0.49; 2.16 CI]). These findings indicate that the choice of EMS-specific factors such as the application mode, the combination with voluntary activation, and the selection of stimulation protocols has an impact on the magnitude of the effects and should therefore be carefully considered, especially in athletes. Superimposed EMS with relatively low volume, high intensity and outcome-specific movement patterns appeared to positively influence adaptations in athletes.<b>Highlights</b>Key performance parameters such as maximal strength, jump height and sprint time can be increased by adequate EMS intervention programs in already well-trained athletes.The effectiveness of EMS training in athletes is highly dependent on the selected EMS method. Volume, intensity, exercise and movement specificity play a crucial role for the efficiency of the training.The most effective option for athletes appears to be a combination of superimposed EMS with relatively low EMS volume, high intensity, and movement-specific exercise pattern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Sport Science\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"1570-1580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Sport Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2022.2107437\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2022.2107437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本系统综述和网络荟萃分析旨在评估不同肌电刺激(EMS)干预对运动员表现参数的有效性。该研究使用PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane和SPORTDiscus在线数据库进行至2021年5月,纳入标准如下:(a)对照试验,(b)至少有一个运动和/或对照组的EMS试验,(c)力量和/或跳跃和/或冲刺和/或有氧能力参数作为结果,(d)运动/训练受试者。计算95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)和随机效应模型。选取了36项研究,共1.092名被试,构建了力量、跳跃、冲刺、有氧能力4个不同的网络。对不同的锻炼方法进行了排序。与参考对照“主动对照”相比,抗阻训练与叠加EMS和额外跳跃训练相结合的两两比较效果最高(结果强度:4.43 SMD [2.15;6.70 CI);结果跳跃:3.14 SMD [1.80;4.49 CI]),跳跃训练加全身肌电刺激(WB-EMS)(结果冲刺:1.65 SMD [0.67;2.63 CI])和高强度体重阻力训练叠加WB-EMS(结果有氧能力:0.83 SMD [-0.49;2.16 CI])。这些发现表明,ems特定因素的选择,如应用模式,与自愿激活的结合,以及刺激方案的选择,对效果的大小有影响,因此应该仔细考虑,特别是在运动员中。具有相对低容量、高强度和结果特异性运动模式的叠加EMS似乎对运动员的适应性有积极影响。关键的性能参数,如最大力量,跳跃高度和冲刺时间可以通过适当的EMS干预计划在已经训练有素的运动员中增加。运动员EMS训练的有效性高度依赖于所选择的EMS方法。量、强度、运动量和动作特异性对训练的效率起着至关重要的作用。对于运动员来说,最有效的选择似乎是叠加EMS与相对低EMS量,高强度和特定运动模式的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of electromyostimulation on performance parameters in sportive and trained athletes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different electromyostimulation (EMS) interventions on performance parameters in athletes. The research was conducted until May 2021 using the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and SPORTDiscus for studies with the following inclusion criteria: (a) controlled trials, (b) EMS trials with at least one exercise and/or control group, (c) strength and/or jump and/or sprint and/or aerobic capacity parameter as outcome (d) sportive/trained subjects. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and random effects models were calculated. Thirty-six studies with 1.092 participants were selected and 4 different networks (strength, jump, sprint, aerobic capacity) were built. A ranking of different exercise methods was achieved. The highest effects for pairwise comparisons against the reference control "active control" were found for a combination of resistance training with superimposed EMS and additional jump training (outcome strength: 4.43 SMD [2.15; 6.70 CI]; outcome jump: 3.14 SMD [1.80; 4.49 CI]), jump training with superimposed whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) (outcome sprint: 1.65 SMD [0.67; 2.63 CI]) and high intensity bodyweight resistance training with superimposed WB-EMS (outcome aerobic capacity: 0.83 SMD [-0.49; 2.16 CI]). These findings indicate that the choice of EMS-specific factors such as the application mode, the combination with voluntary activation, and the selection of stimulation protocols has an impact on the magnitude of the effects and should therefore be carefully considered, especially in athletes. Superimposed EMS with relatively low volume, high intensity and outcome-specific movement patterns appeared to positively influence adaptations in athletes.HighlightsKey performance parameters such as maximal strength, jump height and sprint time can be increased by adequate EMS intervention programs in already well-trained athletes.The effectiveness of EMS training in athletes is highly dependent on the selected EMS method. Volume, intensity, exercise and movement specificity play a crucial role for the efficiency of the training.The most effective option for athletes appears to be a combination of superimposed EMS with relatively low EMS volume, high intensity, and movement-specific exercise pattern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Sport Science
European Journal of Sport Science 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Sport Science (EJSS) is the official Medline- and Thomson Reuters-listed journal of the European College of Sport Science. The editorial policy of the Journal pursues the multi-disciplinary aims of the College: to promote the highest standards of scientific study and scholarship in respect of the following fields: (a) Applied Sport Sciences; (b) Biomechanics and Motor Control; c) Physiology and Nutrition; (d) Psychology, Social Sciences and Humanities and (e) Sports and Exercise Medicine and Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信