德国伊纹伊蚊样本可能实际上并不代表这种蜱。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Robert E. Rollins , Gabriele Margos , Andreas Brachmann , Stefan Krebs , Alexia Mouchet , Niels J. Dingemanse , AbdElkarim Laatamna , Nassiba Reghaissia , Volker Fingerle , Dirk Metzler , Noémie S. Becker , Lidia Chitimia-Dobler
{"title":"德国伊纹伊蚊样本可能实际上并不代表这种蜱。","authors":"Robert E. Rollins ,&nbsp;Gabriele Margos ,&nbsp;Andreas Brachmann ,&nbsp;Stefan Krebs ,&nbsp;Alexia Mouchet ,&nbsp;Niels J. Dingemanse ,&nbsp;AbdElkarim Laatamna ,&nbsp;Nassiba Reghaissia ,&nbsp;Volker Fingerle ,&nbsp;Dirk Metzler ,&nbsp;Noémie S. Becker ,&nbsp;Lidia Chitimia-Dobler","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ticks are important vectors of human and animal pathogens, but many questions remain unanswered regarding their taxonomy. Molecular sequencing methods have allowed research to start understanding the evolutionary history of even closely related tick species. <em>Ixodes inopinatus</em> is considered a sister species and highly similar to <em>Ixodes ricinus</em>, an important vector of many tick-borne pathogens in Europe, but identification between these species remains ambiguous with disagreement on the geographic extent of <em>I. inopinatus</em>. In 2018–2019, 1583 ticks were collected from breeding great tits (<em>Parus major</em>) in southern Germany, of which 45 were later morphologically identified as <em>I. inopinatus.</em> We aimed to confirm morphological identification using molecular tools. Utilizing two genetic markers (16S rRNA, TROSPA) and whole genome sequencing of specific ticks (<em>n</em> = 8), we were able to determine that German samples, morphologically identified as <em>I. inopinatus</em>, genetically represent <em>I. ricinus</em> regardless of previous morphological identification, and most likely are not <em>I. ricinus</em>/<em>I. inopinatus</em> hybrids. Further, our results showed that the entire mitochondrial genome, let alone singular mitochondrial genes (i.e., 16S), is unable to distinguish between <em>I. ricinus</em> and <em>I. inopinatus</em>. Our results suggest that <em>I. inopinatus</em> is geographically isolated as a species (northern Africa and potentially southern Spain and Portugal) and brings into question whether <em>I. inopinatus</em> exists in central Europe. Our results highlight the probable existence of <em>I. inopinatus</em> and the power of utilizing genomic data in answering questions regarding tick taxonomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13725,"journal":{"name":"International journal for parasitology","volume":"53 13","pages":"Pages 751-761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"German Ixodes inopinatus samples may not actually represent this tick species\",\"authors\":\"Robert E. Rollins ,&nbsp;Gabriele Margos ,&nbsp;Andreas Brachmann ,&nbsp;Stefan Krebs ,&nbsp;Alexia Mouchet ,&nbsp;Niels J. Dingemanse ,&nbsp;AbdElkarim Laatamna ,&nbsp;Nassiba Reghaissia ,&nbsp;Volker Fingerle ,&nbsp;Dirk Metzler ,&nbsp;Noémie S. Becker ,&nbsp;Lidia Chitimia-Dobler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ticks are important vectors of human and animal pathogens, but many questions remain unanswered regarding their taxonomy. Molecular sequencing methods have allowed research to start understanding the evolutionary history of even closely related tick species. <em>Ixodes inopinatus</em> is considered a sister species and highly similar to <em>Ixodes ricinus</em>, an important vector of many tick-borne pathogens in Europe, but identification between these species remains ambiguous with disagreement on the geographic extent of <em>I. inopinatus</em>. In 2018–2019, 1583 ticks were collected from breeding great tits (<em>Parus major</em>) in southern Germany, of which 45 were later morphologically identified as <em>I. inopinatus.</em> We aimed to confirm morphological identification using molecular tools. Utilizing two genetic markers (16S rRNA, TROSPA) and whole genome sequencing of specific ticks (<em>n</em> = 8), we were able to determine that German samples, morphologically identified as <em>I. inopinatus</em>, genetically represent <em>I. ricinus</em> regardless of previous morphological identification, and most likely are not <em>I. ricinus</em>/<em>I. inopinatus</em> hybrids. Further, our results showed that the entire mitochondrial genome, let alone singular mitochondrial genes (i.e., 16S), is unable to distinguish between <em>I. ricinus</em> and <em>I. inopinatus</em>. Our results suggest that <em>I. inopinatus</em> is geographically isolated as a species (northern Africa and potentially southern Spain and Portugal) and brings into question whether <em>I. inopinatus</em> exists in central Europe. Our results highlight the probable existence of <em>I. inopinatus</em> and the power of utilizing genomic data in answering questions regarding tick taxonomy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal for parasitology\",\"volume\":\"53 13\",\"pages\":\"Pages 751-761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal for parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020751923001571\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020751923001571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蜱是人类和动物病原体的重要载体,但关于它们的分类,许多问题仍未得到解答。分子测序方法使研究开始了解甚至是密切相关的蜱虫物种的进化史。伊蠓被认为是一个姐妹种,与欧洲许多蜱传病原体的重要媒介蓖麻伊蚊高度相似,但这些物种之间的鉴定仍然不明确,对伊蠓的地理范围存在分歧。2018-2019年,在德国南部从繁殖的大山雀(Parus major)身上收集了1583只蜱,其中45只后来在形态学上被确定为伊诺皮纳特。我们的目的是用分子工具确认形态学鉴定。利用两个遗传标记(16S rRNA, TROSPA)和特定蜱的全基因组测序(n = 8),我们能够确定德国样本,形态鉴定为伊诺伊蜱,在遗传上代表蓖麻蜱,而不考虑先前的形态鉴定,很可能不是蓖麻蜱/I。inopinatus混合动力车。此外,我们的研究结果表明,整个线粒体基因组,更不用说单个线粒体基因(即16S),无法区分蓖麻鼠和伊诺皮鼠。我们的研究结果表明,伊蠓在地理上是孤立的一个物种(北非和潜在的西班牙南部和葡萄牙),并提出了伊蠓是否存在于中欧的问题。我们的研究结果强调了伊蠓可能存在的可能性,以及利用基因组数据回答蜱类分类学问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

German Ixodes inopinatus samples may not actually represent this tick species

German Ixodes inopinatus samples may not actually represent this tick species

Ticks are important vectors of human and animal pathogens, but many questions remain unanswered regarding their taxonomy. Molecular sequencing methods have allowed research to start understanding the evolutionary history of even closely related tick species. Ixodes inopinatus is considered a sister species and highly similar to Ixodes ricinus, an important vector of many tick-borne pathogens in Europe, but identification between these species remains ambiguous with disagreement on the geographic extent of I. inopinatus. In 2018–2019, 1583 ticks were collected from breeding great tits (Parus major) in southern Germany, of which 45 were later morphologically identified as I. inopinatus. We aimed to confirm morphological identification using molecular tools. Utilizing two genetic markers (16S rRNA, TROSPA) and whole genome sequencing of specific ticks (n = 8), we were able to determine that German samples, morphologically identified as I. inopinatus, genetically represent I. ricinus regardless of previous morphological identification, and most likely are not I. ricinus/I. inopinatus hybrids. Further, our results showed that the entire mitochondrial genome, let alone singular mitochondrial genes (i.e., 16S), is unable to distinguish between I. ricinus and I. inopinatus. Our results suggest that I. inopinatus is geographically isolated as a species (northern Africa and potentially southern Spain and Portugal) and brings into question whether I. inopinatus exists in central Europe. Our results highlight the probable existence of I. inopinatus and the power of utilizing genomic data in answering questions regarding tick taxonomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: International Journal for Parasitology offers authors the option to sponsor nonsubscriber access to their articles on Elsevier electronic publishing platforms. For more information please view our Sponsored Articles page. The International Journal for Parasitology publishes the results of original research in all aspects of basic and applied parasitology, including all the fields covered by its Specialist Editors, and ranging from parasites and host-parasite relationships of intrinsic biological interest to those of social and economic importance in human and veterinary medicine and agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信