抵抗、运动控制和以正念为基础的练习对治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛有效:一项荟萃分析和剂量-反应荟萃回归的系统综述。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Juliane Mueller, Jonas Weinig, Daniel Niederer, Sarah Tenberg, Steffen Mueller
{"title":"抵抗、运动控制和以正念为基础的练习对治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛有效:一项荟萃分析和剂量-反应荟萃回归的系统综述。","authors":"Juliane Mueller, Jonas Weinig, Daniel Niederer, Sarah Tenberg, Steffen Mueller","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> We aimed to analyze the effects and dose-response relationship of the most effective exercises for improving pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific neck pain. <b>DESIGN:</b> Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We searched the PubMed, PEDro, and CENTRAL databases from their inception to September 30, 2022. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> We included randomized controlled trials that involved people with chronic neck pain adopting a longitudinal exercise intervention and assessed one pain and/or disability outcome. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects meta-analyses were modeled separately for resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises; standardized mean differences (Hedge's <i>g</i>, standardized mean difference [SMD]) were effect estimators. Meta-regressions (dependent variable: effect sizes of the interventions; independent variables: training dose and control group effects) were conducted to explore the dose-response relationship for therapy success of any exercise type. <b>RESULTS:</b> We included 68 trials. Compared to true control, effects on pain and disability were significantly larger for resistance exercise (pain: SMD, -1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.26, -0.28; |<sup>2</sup> = 96%; disability: SMD, -1.76; 95% CI: -3.16, -0.37; |<sup>2</sup> = 98%), motor control exercise (pain: SMD, -2.29; 95% CI: -3.82, -0.75; |<sup>2</sup> = 98%; disability: SMD, -2.42; 95% CI: -3.38, -1.47; |<sup>2</sup> = 94%), and Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise (pain: SMD, 1.91; 95% CI:-3.28, -0.55; |<sup>2</sup> = 96%; disability: SMD, -0.62; 95% CI: -0.85, -0.38; |<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise was more effective than other exercises (SMD, -0.84; 95% CI: -1.553, -0.13; |<sup>2</sup> = 86%) for reducing pain. For disability, motor control exercise was superior to other exercises (SMD, -0.70; 95% CI: -1.23, -0.17; |<sup>2</sup> = 98%). There was no dose-response relationship for resistance exercise (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.32). Higher frequencies (estimate = -0.10) and longer durations (estimate = -0.11) of motor control exercise had larger effects on pain (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.72). Longer sessions (estimate = -0.13) of motor control exercise had larger effects on disability (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.61). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises were effective for reducing neck pain (very low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Higher frequencies and longer duration of sessions had a significant effect on pain for motor control exercise. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-41. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11820</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistance, Motor Control, and Mindfulness-Based Exercises Are Effective for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Dose-Response Meta-Regression.\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Mueller, Jonas Weinig, Daniel Niederer, Sarah Tenberg, Steffen Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2023.11820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> We aimed to analyze the effects and dose-response relationship of the most effective exercises for improving pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific neck pain. <b>DESIGN:</b> Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We searched the PubMed, PEDro, and CENTRAL databases from their inception to September 30, 2022. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> We included randomized controlled trials that involved people with chronic neck pain adopting a longitudinal exercise intervention and assessed one pain and/or disability outcome. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects meta-analyses were modeled separately for resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises; standardized mean differences (Hedge's <i>g</i>, standardized mean difference [SMD]) were effect estimators. Meta-regressions (dependent variable: effect sizes of the interventions; independent variables: training dose and control group effects) were conducted to explore the dose-response relationship for therapy success of any exercise type. <b>RESULTS:</b> We included 68 trials. Compared to true control, effects on pain and disability were significantly larger for resistance exercise (pain: SMD, -1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.26, -0.28; |<sup>2</sup> = 96%; disability: SMD, -1.76; 95% CI: -3.16, -0.37; |<sup>2</sup> = 98%), motor control exercise (pain: SMD, -2.29; 95% CI: -3.82, -0.75; |<sup>2</sup> = 98%; disability: SMD, -2.42; 95% CI: -3.38, -1.47; |<sup>2</sup> = 94%), and Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise (pain: SMD, 1.91; 95% CI:-3.28, -0.55; |<sup>2</sup> = 96%; disability: SMD, -0.62; 95% CI: -0.85, -0.38; |<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise was more effective than other exercises (SMD, -0.84; 95% CI: -1.553, -0.13; |<sup>2</sup> = 86%) for reducing pain. For disability, motor control exercise was superior to other exercises (SMD, -0.70; 95% CI: -1.23, -0.17; |<sup>2</sup> = 98%). There was no dose-response relationship for resistance exercise (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.32). Higher frequencies (estimate = -0.10) and longer durations (estimate = -0.11) of motor control exercise had larger effects on pain (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.72). Longer sessions (estimate = -0.13) of motor control exercise had larger effects on disability (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.61). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises were effective for reducing neck pain (very low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Higher frequencies and longer duration of sessions had a significant effect on pain for motor control exercise. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-41. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11820</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11820\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11820","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在分析最有效的运动对慢性非特异性颈痛患者疼痛和残疾改善的效果和剂量-反应关系。设计:采用meta分析的干预系统评价。文献检索:我们检索了PubMed、PEDro和CENTRAL数据库,从它们成立到2022年9月30日。研究选择标准:我们纳入了采用纵向运动干预的慢性颈部疼痛患者的随机对照试验,并评估了一种疼痛和/或残疾结果。数据综合:限制最大似然随机效应荟萃分析分别对阻力、正念和运动控制练习进行建模;标准化平均差(Hedge’s g,标准化平均差[SMD])为效应估计量。元回归(因变量:干预措施的效应量;采用自变量:训练剂量和对照组效应)来探讨任何运动类型治疗成功的剂量-反应关系。结果:我们纳入了68项试验。与真实对照组相比,阻力运动对疼痛和残疾的影响显著更大(疼痛:SMD, -1.27;95%置信区间[CI]: -2.26, -0.28;|2 = 96%;残疾:SMD, -1.76;95% ci: -3.16, -0.37;|2 = 98%)、运动控制练习(疼痛:SMD, -2.29;95% ci: -3.82, -0.75;|2 = 98%;残疾:SMD, -2.42;95% ci: -3.38, -1.47;|2 = 94%),瑜伽/普拉提/太极/气功运动(疼痛:SMD, 1.91;95% ci:-3.28, -0.55;|2 = 96%;残疾:SMD, -0.62;95% ci: -0.85, -0.38;|2 = 0%)。瑜伽/普拉提/太极/气功运动比其他运动更有效(SMD, -0.84;95% ci: -1.553, -0.13;|2 = 86%)减轻疼痛。对于残疾,运动控制运动优于其他运动(SMD, -0.70;95% ci: -1.23, -0.17;|2 = 98%)。阻力运动组无剂量-反应关系(R2 = 0.32)。运动控制运动的频率越高(估计= -0.10)和持续时间越长(估计= -0.11),对疼痛的影响越大(R2 = 0.72)。较长的运动控制练习时间(估计= -0.13)对残疾的影响更大(R2 = 0.61)。结论:阻力、正念和运动控制练习对减轻颈部疼痛是有效的(非常低到中等确定性的证据)。高频率和长时间的训练对运动控制训练的疼痛有显著影响。[J] .中华体育杂志,2013;33(8):1161 - 1161。Epub: 2023年6月20日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2023.11820。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resistance, Motor Control, and Mindfulness-Based Exercises Are Effective for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Dose-Response Meta-Regression.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze the effects and dose-response relationship of the most effective exercises for improving pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific neck pain. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the PubMed, PEDro, and CENTRAL databases from their inception to September 30, 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials that involved people with chronic neck pain adopting a longitudinal exercise intervention and assessed one pain and/or disability outcome. DATA SYNTHESIS: Restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects meta-analyses were modeled separately for resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises; standardized mean differences (Hedge's g, standardized mean difference [SMD]) were effect estimators. Meta-regressions (dependent variable: effect sizes of the interventions; independent variables: training dose and control group effects) were conducted to explore the dose-response relationship for therapy success of any exercise type. RESULTS: We included 68 trials. Compared to true control, effects on pain and disability were significantly larger for resistance exercise (pain: SMD, -1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.26, -0.28; |2 = 96%; disability: SMD, -1.76; 95% CI: -3.16, -0.37; |2 = 98%), motor control exercise (pain: SMD, -2.29; 95% CI: -3.82, -0.75; |2 = 98%; disability: SMD, -2.42; 95% CI: -3.38, -1.47; |2 = 94%), and Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise (pain: SMD, 1.91; 95% CI:-3.28, -0.55; |2 = 96%; disability: SMD, -0.62; 95% CI: -0.85, -0.38; |2 = 0%). Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise was more effective than other exercises (SMD, -0.84; 95% CI: -1.553, -0.13; |2 = 86%) for reducing pain. For disability, motor control exercise was superior to other exercises (SMD, -0.70; 95% CI: -1.23, -0.17; |2 = 98%). There was no dose-response relationship for resistance exercise (R2 = 0.32). Higher frequencies (estimate = -0.10) and longer durations (estimate = -0.11) of motor control exercise had larger effects on pain (R2 = 0.72). Longer sessions (estimate = -0.13) of motor control exercise had larger effects on disability (R2 = 0.61). CONCLUSION: Resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises were effective for reducing neck pain (very low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Higher frequencies and longer duration of sessions had a significant effect on pain for motor control exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-41. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11820.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信