耳朵的眼睛:眼科教育播客的使用和效果。

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-07-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S413795
Andrew E Pouw, Fei Cai, Amanda J Redfern, Jessica Chow, Benjamin K Young
{"title":"耳朵的眼睛:眼科教育播客的使用和效果。","authors":"Andrew E Pouw, Fei Cai, Amanda J Redfern, Jessica Chow, Benjamin K Young","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S413795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize listenership and perceived educational impact of the ophthalmic podcast \"Eyes for Ears\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, internet-distributed, 9-question Qualtrics survey was made available to podcast listeners. Listenership metrics were analyzed from the podcast host platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 10, 2019 to September 2, 2021, the podcast was downloaded over 422,000 times, averaging about 4442 downloads per episode. 209 Qualtrics survey responses were analyzed from podcast listeners with backgrounds in eye care including medical students, residents, fellows, clinicians and technicians. The majority were residents (60.3%), representative of the target audience of the podcast. Listeners reported using the podcast while commuting (81.3%), felt it increased the time they could spend on self-care (63.2%), and thought it improved their fund of knowledge (99.0%). Respondents recalled feeling better prepared for the OKAP or written boards after using this podcast (before median = 50/100 on Likert Scale, IQR 30-65 vs median = 70/100, IQR 56-81, p <0.001). Respondents identified question banks as the most helpful for OKAP studying, followed by podcasts. Podcasts were preferred over articles and lectures in terms of helpfulness (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Eyes for Ears podcast has achieved a robust international audience. The surveyed audience felt the podcast was useful for their education and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"2163-2170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/48/opth-17-2163.PMC10392787.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eyes for Ears: Usage and Efficacy of a Podcast for Ophthalmic Education.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew E Pouw, Fei Cai, Amanda J Redfern, Jessica Chow, Benjamin K Young\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S413795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize listenership and perceived educational impact of the ophthalmic podcast \\\"Eyes for Ears\\\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, internet-distributed, 9-question Qualtrics survey was made available to podcast listeners. Listenership metrics were analyzed from the podcast host platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 10, 2019 to September 2, 2021, the podcast was downloaded over 422,000 times, averaging about 4442 downloads per episode. 209 Qualtrics survey responses were analyzed from podcast listeners with backgrounds in eye care including medical students, residents, fellows, clinicians and technicians. The majority were residents (60.3%), representative of the target audience of the podcast. Listeners reported using the podcast while commuting (81.3%), felt it increased the time they could spend on self-care (63.2%), and thought it improved their fund of knowledge (99.0%). Respondents recalled feeling better prepared for the OKAP or written boards after using this podcast (before median = 50/100 on Likert Scale, IQR 30-65 vs median = 70/100, IQR 56-81, p <0.001). Respondents identified question banks as the most helpful for OKAP studying, followed by podcasts. Podcasts were preferred over articles and lectures in terms of helpfulness (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Eyes for Ears podcast has achieved a robust international audience. The surveyed audience felt the podcast was useful for their education and well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"2163-2170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/48/opth-17-2163.PMC10392787.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S413795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S413795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解眼科播客 "Eyes for Ears "的收听情况和感知到的教育影响:方法: 在互联网上向播客听众发放一份包含 9 个问题的 Qualtrics 问卷调查。结果:从 2019 年 1 月 10 日到 9 月 2 日,播客的收听率达到了 100%:从 2019 年 1 月 10 日到 2021 年 9 月 2 日,播客的下载量超过 42.2 万次,平均每集下载量约为 4442 次。对 209 份 Qualtrics 调查回复进行了分析,这些播客听众具有眼科护理背景,包括医学生、住院医师、研究员、临床医师和技术人员。大多数听众是住院医师(60.3%),代表了播客的目标受众。收听者表示在通勤时使用播客(81.3%),认为播客增加了他们用于自我护理的时间(63.2%),并认为播客提高了他们的知识储备(99.0%)。受访者回忆说,在使用该播客之后,他们觉得自己为 OKAP 或书面考试做了更好的准备(之前李克特量表的中位数 = 50/100,IQR 30-65 vs 中位数 = 70/100,IQR 56-81,p 结论:"在使用该播客后,受访者觉得自己为 OKAP 或书面考试做了更好的准备:Eyes for Ears 播客在国际上拥有众多受众。接受调查的听众认为播客对他们的教育和身心健康很有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Eyes for Ears: Usage and Efficacy of a Podcast for Ophthalmic Education.

Eyes for Ears: Usage and Efficacy of a Podcast for Ophthalmic Education.

Eyes for Ears: Usage and Efficacy of a Podcast for Ophthalmic Education.

Purpose: To characterize listenership and perceived educational impact of the ophthalmic podcast "Eyes for Ears".

Methods: A cross-sectional, internet-distributed, 9-question Qualtrics survey was made available to podcast listeners. Listenership metrics were analyzed from the podcast host platform.

Results: From January 10, 2019 to September 2, 2021, the podcast was downloaded over 422,000 times, averaging about 4442 downloads per episode. 209 Qualtrics survey responses were analyzed from podcast listeners with backgrounds in eye care including medical students, residents, fellows, clinicians and technicians. The majority were residents (60.3%), representative of the target audience of the podcast. Listeners reported using the podcast while commuting (81.3%), felt it increased the time they could spend on self-care (63.2%), and thought it improved their fund of knowledge (99.0%). Respondents recalled feeling better prepared for the OKAP or written boards after using this podcast (before median = 50/100 on Likert Scale, IQR 30-65 vs median = 70/100, IQR 56-81, p <0.001). Respondents identified question banks as the most helpful for OKAP studying, followed by podcasts. Podcasts were preferred over articles and lectures in terms of helpfulness (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Eyes for Ears podcast has achieved a robust international audience. The surveyed audience felt the podcast was useful for their education and well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信