作者回复:对Zhou等人关于补充硫胺素对改变精神状态的影响的回应。

Q2 Medicine
Daniel J Zhou, Sachin Kedar
{"title":"作者回复:对Zhou等人关于补充硫胺素对改变精神状态的影响的回应。","authors":"Daniel J Zhou, Sachin Kedar","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2023.2170154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We thank Drs. Trebach and Hoffman for their thoughtful remarks and use this opportunity to discuss their concerns. We acknowledge the limitations of a single institution-based, retrospective, cohort study and have addressed these in our manuscript extensively [1]. In this practice-based, real-world study, we examined hospital outcomes and thiamine prescription patterns among a diverse group of hospital-based providers who were licensed and credentialed to manage patients with altered mental status from all-causes, including those with hypoglycemia. While we found wide variations in the thiamine prescription patterns (timing, dosage, and route of administration), we are not unique in reporting such variations in clinical practice [2– 6]. It is possible that differences in prescription patterns such as glucose-first vs. thiamine-first or parenteral vs. enteral vs. no thiamine could be the result of disease severity. While we controlled for disease severity using Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weight in our models, it is possible that this measure may not have captured the breadth of clinical severity. Additional analyses of the effects of different dosages on outcomes were not feasible due to wide variations in clinical practice resulting in small patient numbers in groups. We acknowledge the growing evidence for the lack of benefit of supplemental thiamine in critically ill patients [7,8]. It has also been reported that glucose administration before or without thiamine would not acutely worsen the effects of thiamine deficiency unless the glucose administration is prolonged [9]. However, in our study, we found that patients who received glucose before or without thiamine had increased inhospital mortality rate after controlling for disease severity. Based on the results of our study, we cannot in good conscience, argue against the current medical practice (dogma) of administering parenteral thiamine before glucose for critically ill patients with altered mental status from all causes.","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authors' reply, re: A response to Zhou et al. regarding thiamine supplementation in altered mental status.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J Zhou, Sachin Kedar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548331.2023.2170154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We thank Drs. Trebach and Hoffman for their thoughtful remarks and use this opportunity to discuss their concerns. We acknowledge the limitations of a single institution-based, retrospective, cohort study and have addressed these in our manuscript extensively [1]. In this practice-based, real-world study, we examined hospital outcomes and thiamine prescription patterns among a diverse group of hospital-based providers who were licensed and credentialed to manage patients with altered mental status from all-causes, including those with hypoglycemia. While we found wide variations in the thiamine prescription patterns (timing, dosage, and route of administration), we are not unique in reporting such variations in clinical practice [2– 6]. It is possible that differences in prescription patterns such as glucose-first vs. thiamine-first or parenteral vs. enteral vs. no thiamine could be the result of disease severity. While we controlled for disease severity using Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weight in our models, it is possible that this measure may not have captured the breadth of clinical severity. Additional analyses of the effects of different dosages on outcomes were not feasible due to wide variations in clinical practice resulting in small patient numbers in groups. We acknowledge the growing evidence for the lack of benefit of supplemental thiamine in critically ill patients [7,8]. It has also been reported that glucose administration before or without thiamine would not acutely worsen the effects of thiamine deficiency unless the glucose administration is prolonged [9]. However, in our study, we found that patients who received glucose before or without thiamine had increased inhospital mortality rate after controlling for disease severity. Based on the results of our study, we cannot in good conscience, argue against the current medical practice (dogma) of administering parenteral thiamine before glucose for critically ill patients with altered mental status from all causes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital practice (1995)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital practice (1995)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2023.2170154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2023.2170154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Authors' reply, re: A response to Zhou et al. regarding thiamine supplementation in altered mental status.
We thank Drs. Trebach and Hoffman for their thoughtful remarks and use this opportunity to discuss their concerns. We acknowledge the limitations of a single institution-based, retrospective, cohort study and have addressed these in our manuscript extensively [1]. In this practice-based, real-world study, we examined hospital outcomes and thiamine prescription patterns among a diverse group of hospital-based providers who were licensed and credentialed to manage patients with altered mental status from all-causes, including those with hypoglycemia. While we found wide variations in the thiamine prescription patterns (timing, dosage, and route of administration), we are not unique in reporting such variations in clinical practice [2– 6]. It is possible that differences in prescription patterns such as glucose-first vs. thiamine-first or parenteral vs. enteral vs. no thiamine could be the result of disease severity. While we controlled for disease severity using Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weight in our models, it is possible that this measure may not have captured the breadth of clinical severity. Additional analyses of the effects of different dosages on outcomes were not feasible due to wide variations in clinical practice resulting in small patient numbers in groups. We acknowledge the growing evidence for the lack of benefit of supplemental thiamine in critically ill patients [7,8]. It has also been reported that glucose administration before or without thiamine would not acutely worsen the effects of thiamine deficiency unless the glucose administration is prolonged [9]. However, in our study, we found that patients who received glucose before or without thiamine had increased inhospital mortality rate after controlling for disease severity. Based on the results of our study, we cannot in good conscience, argue against the current medical practice (dogma) of administering parenteral thiamine before glucose for critically ill patients with altered mental status from all causes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信