晚期破裂主动脉假性动脉瘤去缩窄术后血管内修复术中并发症的解决:一例报告及文献综述。

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-04 DOI:10.1177/15266028231177047
Paolo Righini, Daniela Mazzaccaro, Marina Galligani, Matteo Giannetta, Francesco Secchi, Mario Carminati, Giovanni Nano
{"title":"晚期破裂主动脉假性动脉瘤去缩窄术后血管内修复术中并发症的解决:一例报告及文献综述。","authors":"Paolo Righini, Daniela Mazzaccaro, Marina Galligani, Matteo Giannetta, Francesco Secchi, Mario Carminati, Giovanni Nano","doi":"10.1177/15266028231177047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We present a case of successful endovascular repair of late ruptured aortic anastomotic pseudoaneurysm following previous left subclavian artery-descending thoracic aorta bypass and concomitant emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of complicated endovascular aortic de-coarctation never previously described is also presented. A review of the intraoperative, 30-day, and follow-up morbidity, mortality, and complications of TEVAR as endovascular treatment of late aneurysm/pseudoaneurysms after surgical aortic de-coarctation was also performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and following PICO model. A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science using the words \"tevar of late complication of aortic coarctation surgical repair\" and \"endovascular repair of anastomotic pseudoaneurysm in coarctation\" up to June 17, 2022. Data were extracted from study documents about study design, patient's demographics and comorbidities, details about primary surgical repair, type of late complication, time between open surgery and occurrence of complications, details of the secondary endovascular procedure with technical success, early, and follow-up mortality and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 papers were included with 78 patients (48 men, 69.5%). The most frequent type of primary open surgical repair was patch aortoplasty (46, 58.9%). Focusing on aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm as late complications, most of the patients were asymptomatic (45, 57.7%). All patients underwent TEVAR, 14 of them (17.9%) in urgent/emergent setting. The technical success was 98.7%, with 1 intraoperative death due to rupture of the aorta. In total, 31 patients out of 78 (39.7%) showed different complications in the immediate postoperative time, with type II endoleak being the most observed (8/31, 25.8%). The mean follow-up time was about 2 years (26.5 months, range 3-92). Overall, 30-day mortality was 2.6%. Complications occurred in 30 patients (39.4%), 23 of them resolved during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the limit of low-quality data, TEVAR can be considered a safe and effective option for the treatment of late complications after open surgery for aortic coarctation, even in urgent settings.Clinical ImpactDifferent specialists have to face the technical complexities and risks related to treatment of late complications after surgical de-coartaction, which can be either surgical or endovascular, and depend on patient's ages. Although covered stents appear to have some protection from the development of stent fractures, doesn't provide complete protection from late aneurysm formation. In this setting, TEVAR may represent a valuable option, combining the advantages of the covered stent with those of a device that can cover a wider range of aortic length, especially in adult patients. This study shows thoracic endovascular repair can be considered a safe and effective option in clincal practice for the treatment of late complications after open surgery for AC, even in urgent settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"290-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solving Intraoperative Complications During Endovascular Repair of Late Contained Ruptured Aortic Pseudoaneurysm After Surgical De-coarctation: Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Righini, Daniela Mazzaccaro, Marina Galligani, Matteo Giannetta, Francesco Secchi, Mario Carminati, Giovanni Nano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15266028231177047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We present a case of successful endovascular repair of late ruptured aortic anastomotic pseudoaneurysm following previous left subclavian artery-descending thoracic aorta bypass and concomitant emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of complicated endovascular aortic de-coarctation never previously described is also presented. A review of the intraoperative, 30-day, and follow-up morbidity, mortality, and complications of TEVAR as endovascular treatment of late aneurysm/pseudoaneurysms after surgical aortic de-coarctation was also performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and following PICO model. A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science using the words \\\"tevar of late complication of aortic coarctation surgical repair\\\" and \\\"endovascular repair of anastomotic pseudoaneurysm in coarctation\\\" up to June 17, 2022. Data were extracted from study documents about study design, patient's demographics and comorbidities, details about primary surgical repair, type of late complication, time between open surgery and occurrence of complications, details of the secondary endovascular procedure with technical success, early, and follow-up mortality and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 papers were included with 78 patients (48 men, 69.5%). The most frequent type of primary open surgical repair was patch aortoplasty (46, 58.9%). Focusing on aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm as late complications, most of the patients were asymptomatic (45, 57.7%). All patients underwent TEVAR, 14 of them (17.9%) in urgent/emergent setting. The technical success was 98.7%, with 1 intraoperative death due to rupture of the aorta. In total, 31 patients out of 78 (39.7%) showed different complications in the immediate postoperative time, with type II endoleak being the most observed (8/31, 25.8%). The mean follow-up time was about 2 years (26.5 months, range 3-92). Overall, 30-day mortality was 2.6%. Complications occurred in 30 patients (39.4%), 23 of them resolved during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With the limit of low-quality data, TEVAR can be considered a safe and effective option for the treatment of late complications after open surgery for aortic coarctation, even in urgent settings.Clinical ImpactDifferent specialists have to face the technical complexities and risks related to treatment of late complications after surgical de-coartaction, which can be either surgical or endovascular, and depend on patient's ages. Although covered stents appear to have some protection from the development of stent fractures, doesn't provide complete protection from late aneurysm formation. In this setting, TEVAR may represent a valuable option, combining the advantages of the covered stent with those of a device that can cover a wider range of aortic length, especially in adult patients. This study shows thoracic endovascular repair can be considered a safe and effective option in clincal practice for the treatment of late complications after open surgery for AC, even in urgent settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"290-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231177047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231177047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们报告一例成功的血管内修复晚期破裂的主动脉吻合口假性动脉瘤后,先前的左锁骨下动脉-胸降主动脉绕道术和伴随的急诊胸血管内主动脉修复术(TEVAR)复杂的血管内主动脉去缩窄从未报道过。我们还回顾了TEVAR作为血管内治疗手术后晚期动脉瘤/假性动脉瘤的术中、30天及随访的发病率、死亡率和并发症。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明和PICO模型进行系统评价。检索截至2022年6月17日的MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Google Scholar、Science Direct和Web of Science,检索词为“tevar of late并发症of aortic cor缩手术修复”和“吻合口假性动脉瘤血管内修复术”。数据提取自研究文件,包括研究设计、患者人口统计学和合并症、初次手术修复的细节、晚期并发症的类型、开放手术与并发症发生之间的时间、技术成功的继发性血管内手术的细节、早期和随访的死亡率和发病率。结果:共纳入文献18篇,患者78例(男性48例,占69.5%)。最常见的是主动脉修补术(46.58.9%)。以动脉瘤和假性动脉瘤为晚期并发症,大多数患者无症状(45例,57.7%)。所有患者均接受TEVAR治疗,其中14例(17.9%)发生在紧急/紧急情况下。技术成功率为98.7%,术中因主动脉破裂死亡1例。78例患者中有31例(39.7%)在术后立即出现不同并发症,其中II型内漏最多(8/31,25.8%)。平均随访时间约2年(26.5个月,范围3 ~ 92)。总体而言,30天死亡率为2.6%。并发症30例(39.4%),其中23例在随访期间消失。结论:由于低质量数据的限制,TEVAR可以被认为是治疗主动脉缩窄开放性手术后晚期并发症的安全有效的选择,即使在紧急情况下也是如此。临床影响:不同的专科医生必须面对手术脱脱后晚期并发症治疗的技术复杂性和风险,这可能是手术或血管内的,并取决于患者的年龄。尽管覆膜支架似乎对支架骨折的发生有一定的保护作用,但并不能完全防止晚期动脉瘤的形成。在这种情况下,TEVAR可能是一个有价值的选择,它结合了覆盖支架的优点和可以覆盖更大范围主动脉长度的设备的优点,特别是在成人患者中。本研究表明,在临床实践中,胸腔血管内修复可以被认为是治疗AC开放性手术后晚期并发症的一种安全有效的选择,即使在紧急情况下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Solving Intraoperative Complications During Endovascular Repair of Late Contained Ruptured Aortic Pseudoaneurysm After Surgical De-coarctation: Case Report and Systematic Review of Literature.

Aim: We present a case of successful endovascular repair of late ruptured aortic anastomotic pseudoaneurysm following previous left subclavian artery-descending thoracic aorta bypass and concomitant emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of complicated endovascular aortic de-coarctation never previously described is also presented. A review of the intraoperative, 30-day, and follow-up morbidity, mortality, and complications of TEVAR as endovascular treatment of late aneurysm/pseudoaneurysms after surgical aortic de-coarctation was also performed.

Methods: The systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and following PICO model. A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science using the words "tevar of late complication of aortic coarctation surgical repair" and "endovascular repair of anastomotic pseudoaneurysm in coarctation" up to June 17, 2022. Data were extracted from study documents about study design, patient's demographics and comorbidities, details about primary surgical repair, type of late complication, time between open surgery and occurrence of complications, details of the secondary endovascular procedure with technical success, early, and follow-up mortality and morbidity.

Results: A total of 18 papers were included with 78 patients (48 men, 69.5%). The most frequent type of primary open surgical repair was patch aortoplasty (46, 58.9%). Focusing on aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm as late complications, most of the patients were asymptomatic (45, 57.7%). All patients underwent TEVAR, 14 of them (17.9%) in urgent/emergent setting. The technical success was 98.7%, with 1 intraoperative death due to rupture of the aorta. In total, 31 patients out of 78 (39.7%) showed different complications in the immediate postoperative time, with type II endoleak being the most observed (8/31, 25.8%). The mean follow-up time was about 2 years (26.5 months, range 3-92). Overall, 30-day mortality was 2.6%. Complications occurred in 30 patients (39.4%), 23 of them resolved during the follow-up period.

Conclusions: With the limit of low-quality data, TEVAR can be considered a safe and effective option for the treatment of late complications after open surgery for aortic coarctation, even in urgent settings.Clinical ImpactDifferent specialists have to face the technical complexities and risks related to treatment of late complications after surgical de-coartaction, which can be either surgical or endovascular, and depend on patient's ages. Although covered stents appear to have some protection from the development of stent fractures, doesn't provide complete protection from late aneurysm formation. In this setting, TEVAR may represent a valuable option, combining the advantages of the covered stent with those of a device that can cover a wider range of aortic length, especially in adult patients. This study shows thoracic endovascular repair can be considered a safe and effective option in clincal practice for the treatment of late complications after open surgery for AC, even in urgent settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信