全髋关节置换术早期并发症的处理:即刻翻修的安全性。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jules Descamps, Victoria Teissier, Wilfrid Graff, Antoine Mouton, Pierre-Alban Bouché, Simon Marmor
{"title":"全髋关节置换术早期并发症的处理:即刻翻修的安全性。","authors":"Jules Descamps,&nbsp;Victoria Teissier,&nbsp;Wilfrid Graff,&nbsp;Antoine Mouton,&nbsp;Pierre-Alban Bouché,&nbsp;Simon Marmor","doi":"10.1186/s10195-023-00719-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immediate revision refers to a reoperation that involves resetting, draping, and exchanging the implant, after wound closure in total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of immediate revision after total hip arthroplasty on subsequent infection and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 14,076 primary total hip arthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020 were identified in our institutional database, of which 42 underwent immediate revision. Infection rates were determined 2 years after the index arthroplasty. The cause and type of revision, duration of primary and revision surgeries, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score, implant type, changes in implants, complications, and preoperative and intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis were all determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No infections were observed within 2 years after the index arthroplasty. Leg length discrepancy (88%, n = 37) and dislocation (7.1%, n = 3) were the main causes of immediate revision. In most cases of discrepancy, the limb was clinically and radiologically longer before the immediate revision. The mean operative time was 48 ± 14 min for the primary procedure and 23.6 ± 9 min for the revision. The time between the first incision and last skin closure ranged from 1 to 3 h. None of the patients were extubated between the two procedures. Two patients had a National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score of 2, 13 had a score of 1, and 27 had a score of 0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immediate revision is safe for correcting clinical and radiological abnormalities, and may not be associated with increased complication or infection rates.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study; level of evidence, 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"24 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390444/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing early complications in total hip arthroplasty: the safety of immediate revision.\",\"authors\":\"Jules Descamps,&nbsp;Victoria Teissier,&nbsp;Wilfrid Graff,&nbsp;Antoine Mouton,&nbsp;Pierre-Alban Bouché,&nbsp;Simon Marmor\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10195-023-00719-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immediate revision refers to a reoperation that involves resetting, draping, and exchanging the implant, after wound closure in total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of immediate revision after total hip arthroplasty on subsequent infection and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 14,076 primary total hip arthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020 were identified in our institutional database, of which 42 underwent immediate revision. Infection rates were determined 2 years after the index arthroplasty. The cause and type of revision, duration of primary and revision surgeries, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score, implant type, changes in implants, complications, and preoperative and intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis were all determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No infections were observed within 2 years after the index arthroplasty. Leg length discrepancy (88%, n = 37) and dislocation (7.1%, n = 3) were the main causes of immediate revision. In most cases of discrepancy, the limb was clinically and radiologically longer before the immediate revision. The mean operative time was 48 ± 14 min for the primary procedure and 23.6 ± 9 min for the revision. The time between the first incision and last skin closure ranged from 1 to 3 h. None of the patients were extubated between the two procedures. Two patients had a National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score of 2, 13 had a score of 1, and 27 had a score of 0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immediate revision is safe for correcting clinical and radiological abnormalities, and may not be associated with increased complication or infection rates.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study; level of evidence, 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00719-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00719-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:即刻翻修是指全髋关节置换术中伤口闭合后再次手术,包括复位、悬垂和置换假体。本研究的目的是探讨全髋关节置换术后立即翻修对后续感染和并发症发生率的影响。方法:在2010年至2020年期间,在我们的机构数据库中确定了14,076例原发性全髋关节置换术,其中42例进行了立即翻修。观察关节置换术后2年的感染率。确定翻修的原因和类型、初次手术和翻修手术的持续时间、全国医院感染监测评分、种植体类型、种植体变化、并发症以及术前和术中抗生素预防。结果:关节置换术后2年内无感染发生。腿长差异(88%,n = 37)和脱位(7.1%,n = 3)是立即翻修的主要原因。在大多数不一致的病例中,在立即翻修之前,临床和放射学上的肢体更长。初次手术的平均手术时间为48±14分钟,翻修手术的平均手术时间为23.6±9分钟。第一次切开和最后一次皮肤闭合之间的时间为1至3小时。在两次手术之间没有患者拔管。2例患者国家医院感染监测评分为2分,13例评分为1分,27例评分为0分。结论:即刻翻修对于纠正临床和影像学异常是安全的,并且可能不会增加并发症或感染率。研究设计:回顾性队列研究;证据水平,3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Managing early complications in total hip arthroplasty: the safety of immediate revision.

Managing early complications in total hip arthroplasty: the safety of immediate revision.

Managing early complications in total hip arthroplasty: the safety of immediate revision.

Managing early complications in total hip arthroplasty: the safety of immediate revision.

Purpose: Immediate revision refers to a reoperation that involves resetting, draping, and exchanging the implant, after wound closure in total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of immediate revision after total hip arthroplasty on subsequent infection and complication rates.

Methods: A total of 14,076 primary total hip arthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020 were identified in our institutional database, of which 42 underwent immediate revision. Infection rates were determined 2 years after the index arthroplasty. The cause and type of revision, duration of primary and revision surgeries, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score, implant type, changes in implants, complications, and preoperative and intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis were all determined.

Results: No infections were observed within 2 years after the index arthroplasty. Leg length discrepancy (88%, n = 37) and dislocation (7.1%, n = 3) were the main causes of immediate revision. In most cases of discrepancy, the limb was clinically and radiologically longer before the immediate revision. The mean operative time was 48 ± 14 min for the primary procedure and 23.6 ± 9 min for the revision. The time between the first incision and last skin closure ranged from 1 to 3 h. None of the patients were extubated between the two procedures. Two patients had a National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score of 2, 13 had a score of 1, and 27 had a score of 0.

Conclusion: Immediate revision is safe for correcting clinical and radiological abnormalities, and may not be associated with increased complication or infection rates.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study; level of evidence, 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信