射频消融术后下肢静脉功能不全复发的影响因素。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-04 DOI:10.1177/17085381231193512
Hakki Kursat Cetin, Eyup Murat Kanber
{"title":"射频消融术后下肢静脉功能不全复发的影响因素。","authors":"Hakki Kursat Cetin, Eyup Murat Kanber","doi":"10.1177/17085381231193512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify possible factors for recurrence of venous insufficiency following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with lower extremity CVI who underwent RFA therapy were reviewed for inclusion in the study. Patients' characteristics, operative parameters and follow-up outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups (patients with successful RFA and patients with recurrent venous insufficiency). Groups were compared according to patient demographic features, treated vein characteristics, operative data and follow-up duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 313 patients matched the study inclusion criteria and 48 patients encountered RFA failure during follow-up. Mean BMI and ratio of COPD were significantly higher in patients with RFA failure (<i>p</i> = .002 and <i>p</i> = .007). The CEAP classification was significantly different between the groups (<i>p</i> = .007). Mean follow-up time was significantly longer in patients with RFA failure (<i>p</i> = .011). Presence of COPD and BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> increased RFA failure 4.187 times and 2.255 times, respectively (<i>p</i> = .002 and <i>p</i> = .022). Additionally, CEAP C4 significantly increased RFA failure (<i>p</i> = .001). Lastly, longer follow-up time was a predictive factor for RF failure (<i>p</i> = .024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study findings demonstrated for the first time that obesity, presence of COPD, presence of veins classified as CEAP C4 before RFA, and follow-up period longer than 48 months were predictive factors for venous insufficiency recurrence following RFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1335-1339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting lower extremity venous insufficiency recurrence following radiofrequency ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Hakki Kursat Cetin, Eyup Murat Kanber\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381231193512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify possible factors for recurrence of venous insufficiency following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with lower extremity CVI who underwent RFA therapy were reviewed for inclusion in the study. Patients' characteristics, operative parameters and follow-up outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups (patients with successful RFA and patients with recurrent venous insufficiency). Groups were compared according to patient demographic features, treated vein characteristics, operative data and follow-up duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 313 patients matched the study inclusion criteria and 48 patients encountered RFA failure during follow-up. Mean BMI and ratio of COPD were significantly higher in patients with RFA failure (<i>p</i> = .002 and <i>p</i> = .007). The CEAP classification was significantly different between the groups (<i>p</i> = .007). Mean follow-up time was significantly longer in patients with RFA failure (<i>p</i> = .011). Presence of COPD and BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> increased RFA failure 4.187 times and 2.255 times, respectively (<i>p</i> = .002 and <i>p</i> = .022). Additionally, CEAP C4 significantly increased RFA failure (<i>p</i> = .001). Lastly, longer follow-up time was a predictive factor for RF failure (<i>p</i> = .024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study findings demonstrated for the first time that obesity, presence of COPD, presence of veins classified as CEAP C4 before RFA, and follow-up period longer than 48 months were predictive factors for venous insufficiency recurrence following RFA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1335-1339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381231193512\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381231193512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阐明射频消融(RFA)治疗下肢慢性静脉功能不全(CVI)后静脉功能不全复发的可能因素:明确射频消融(RFA)治疗下肢慢性静脉功能不全(CVI)后静脉功能不全复发的可能因素:方法:对接受射频消融治疗的下肢慢性静脉功能不全患者进行回顾性研究。研究记录了患者的特征、手术参数和随访结果。患者被分为两组(成功接受 RFA 治疗的患者和静脉功能不全复发的患者)。根据患者的人口统计学特征、治疗静脉特征、手术数据和随访时间对两组患者进行比较:结果:共有 313 名患者符合研究纳入标准,48 名患者在随访期间遭遇 RFA 失败。RFA失败患者的平均体重指数(BMI)和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)比例明显更高(p = .002 和 p = .007)。两组患者的 CEAP 分级有明显差异(p = .007)。RFA失败患者的平均随访时间明显更长(p = .011)。患有慢性阻塞性肺病和体重指数≥30 kg/m2的患者,RFA失败率分别增加了4.187倍和2.255倍(p = .002 和 p = .022)。此外,CEAP C4 会显著增加 RFA 失败率(p = .001)。最后,较长的随访时间是射频失败的预测因素(p = .024):我们的研究结果首次证明,肥胖、患有慢性阻塞性肺病、RFA 前存在被归类为 CEAP C4 的静脉以及随访时间超过 48 个月是 RFA 后静脉功能不全复发的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting lower extremity venous insufficiency recurrence following radiofrequency ablation.

Objective: To clarify possible factors for recurrence of venous insufficiency following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).

Methods: Patients with lower extremity CVI who underwent RFA therapy were reviewed for inclusion in the study. Patients' characteristics, operative parameters and follow-up outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups (patients with successful RFA and patients with recurrent venous insufficiency). Groups were compared according to patient demographic features, treated vein characteristics, operative data and follow-up duration.

Results: In total, 313 patients matched the study inclusion criteria and 48 patients encountered RFA failure during follow-up. Mean BMI and ratio of COPD were significantly higher in patients with RFA failure (p = .002 and p = .007). The CEAP classification was significantly different between the groups (p = .007). Mean follow-up time was significantly longer in patients with RFA failure (p = .011). Presence of COPD and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 increased RFA failure 4.187 times and 2.255 times, respectively (p = .002 and p = .022). Additionally, CEAP C4 significantly increased RFA failure (p = .001). Lastly, longer follow-up time was a predictive factor for RF failure (p = .024).

Conclusion: Our study findings demonstrated for the first time that obesity, presence of COPD, presence of veins classified as CEAP C4 before RFA, and follow-up period longer than 48 months were predictive factors for venous insufficiency recurrence following RFA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信