选择性头部降温联合全身降温是治疗新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病最有效的降温方法吗?

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yalcin Celik, Anıl Özgür, Mehmet Ali Sungur, Nazım Yıldırım, Selçuk Teke
{"title":"选择性头部降温联合全身降温是治疗新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病最有效的降温方法吗?","authors":"Yalcin Celik,&nbsp;Anıl Özgür,&nbsp;Mehmet Ali Sungur,&nbsp;Nazım Yıldırım,&nbsp;Selçuk Teke","doi":"10.1089/ther.2022.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare combined hypothermia (CH) to the 2 classical therapeutic hypothermia (TH) methods selective head cooling (SHC) and whole-body cooling (WBC). This retrospective cohort study included neonates who underwent CH, SHC, and WBC between 2012 and 2020. Mean rectal temperature was maintained at 33.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the head and the body in the CH group, at 34.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the head in the SHC group, and at 33.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the body in the WBC group. The groups were compared in terms of side effects, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores, and status at discharge. The study included 60 neonates in the CH group, 112 in the WBC group, and 27 in the SHC group. There was no significant difference in side effects between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was no significant difference in brain MRI scores between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05); however, gray matter, white matter, and total MRI scores in the CH group were lower than in the WBC group. Duration of hospitalization was shorter in the CH group than in the other two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.022). CH was not associated with more side effects than the two classical TH methods. In addition, some of these findings suggest that CH might result in better clinical outcome than the two classical TH methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":22972,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management","volume":"13 2","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Selective Head Cooling Combined with Whole-Body Cooling the Most Effective Hypothermia Method for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy?\",\"authors\":\"Yalcin Celik,&nbsp;Anıl Özgür,&nbsp;Mehmet Ali Sungur,&nbsp;Nazım Yıldırım,&nbsp;Selçuk Teke\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ther.2022.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to compare combined hypothermia (CH) to the 2 classical therapeutic hypothermia (TH) methods selective head cooling (SHC) and whole-body cooling (WBC). This retrospective cohort study included neonates who underwent CH, SHC, and WBC between 2012 and 2020. Mean rectal temperature was maintained at 33.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the head and the body in the CH group, at 34.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the head in the SHC group, and at 33.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the body in the WBC group. The groups were compared in terms of side effects, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores, and status at discharge. The study included 60 neonates in the CH group, 112 in the WBC group, and 27 in the SHC group. There was no significant difference in side effects between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was no significant difference in brain MRI scores between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05); however, gray matter, white matter, and total MRI scores in the CH group were lower than in the WBC group. Duration of hospitalization was shorter in the CH group than in the other two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.022). CH was not associated with more side effects than the two classical TH methods. In addition, some of these findings suggest that CH might result in better clinical outcome than the two classical TH methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"70-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2022.0021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2022.0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在比较联合低温治疗(CH)与两种经典的治疗性低温治疗(TH)方法——选择性头部冷却(SHC)和全身冷却(WBC)。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2012年至2020年间接受CH、SHC和WBC的新生儿。CH组通过冷却头部和身体使直肠平均温度保持在33.5±0.5℃,SHC组通过冷却头部使直肠平均温度保持在34.5±0.5℃,WBC组通过冷却身体使直肠平均温度保持在33.5±0.5℃。比较两组的副作用、磁共振成像(MRI)评分和出院状态。该研究包括60名CH组新生儿,112名WBC组新生儿和27名SHC组新生儿。两组间不良反应比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。两组患者脑MRI评分比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05);然而,CH组的灰质、白质和总MRI评分低于WBC组。CH组住院时间短于其他两组(p = 0.022)。与两种经典的TH方法相比,CH与更多的副作用无关。此外,其中一些研究结果表明,CH可能比两种经典的TH方法有更好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Selective Head Cooling Combined with Whole-Body Cooling the Most Effective Hypothermia Method for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy?

This study aimed to compare combined hypothermia (CH) to the 2 classical therapeutic hypothermia (TH) methods selective head cooling (SHC) and whole-body cooling (WBC). This retrospective cohort study included neonates who underwent CH, SHC, and WBC between 2012 and 2020. Mean rectal temperature was maintained at 33.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the head and the body in the CH group, at 34.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the head in the SHC group, and at 33.5 ± 0.5°C by cooling the body in the WBC group. The groups were compared in terms of side effects, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores, and status at discharge. The study included 60 neonates in the CH group, 112 in the WBC group, and 27 in the SHC group. There was no significant difference in side effects between the groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in brain MRI scores between the groups (p > 0.05); however, gray matter, white matter, and total MRI scores in the CH group were lower than in the WBC group. Duration of hospitalization was shorter in the CH group than in the other two groups (p = 0.022). CH was not associated with more side effects than the two classical TH methods. In addition, some of these findings suggest that CH might result in better clinical outcome than the two classical TH methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management is the first and only journal to cover all aspects of hypothermia and temperature considerations relevant to this exciting field, including its application in cardiac arrest, spinal cord and traumatic brain injury, stroke, burns, and much more. The Journal provides a strong multidisciplinary forum to ensure that research advances are well disseminated, and that therapeutic hypothermia is well understood and used effectively to enhance patient outcomes. Novel findings from translational preclinical investigations as well as clinical studies and trials are featured in original articles, state-of-the-art review articles, protocols and best practices. Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management coverage includes: Temperature mechanisms and cooling strategies Protocols, risk factors, and drug interventions Intraoperative considerations Post-resuscitation cooling ICU management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信