新型硅胶板与耳廓软骨在恶性肿瘤切除后上眼睑重建中的比较。

Salil Kumar Mandal, Anwesha Maitra, Oishik Sarkar, Paulomi Roy, Mousree Gayen, Anamika Paul
{"title":"新型硅胶板与耳廓软骨在恶性肿瘤切除后上眼睑重建中的比较。","authors":"Salil Kumar Mandal,&nbsp;Anwesha Maitra,&nbsp;Oishik Sarkar,&nbsp;Paulomi Roy,&nbsp;Mousree Gayen,&nbsp;Anamika Paul","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2023.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare surgical and functional outcomes, safety, efficacy and cost of silicone plate vs. autogenous auricular cartilage (AAC) as alternate material to tarsal plate for upper eyelid reconstruction after excision of malignant tumor. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective, comparative, interventional study of over 3 years was conducted on two groups of twenty patients each. All the patients had undergone the Modified Cutler Beard procedure with AAC being used as tarsal substitute in one group and a novel silicone plate in the other. Post-operative MRD 1, LPS action, Central Lid Thickness, and Lid contour were recorded at one week, one month and six months follow-up. <b>Results:</b> The pre-operative MRD 1 in the silicone plate and AAC group was -2.95 ± 1.19 mm and -3.05 ± 1(1).05 mm, post-operative in the silicone plate group 3.8 ± 0.4 mm, and in the AAC group, 3.8 ± 0.41 mm. The pre-operative LPS action in the silicone plate and AAC group was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm and post-operative it was 13.8 ± 0.4 mm for the silicone plate group and 13.7 ± 0.4 mm for the AAC group. The post-operative lid thickness for the silicone plate group was 4.4 ± 0.17 mm and for the AAC group it was 4.4 ± 0.08 mm. <b>Conclusion:</b> The cosmetic outcome in terms of lid contour maintenance is better in the silicone plate group, in which it markedly reduces the surgical time, provides earlier rehabilitation, and eliminates disease transmission. Harvesting of AAC is a skillful and time-consuming procedure and adds to the post-operative morbidity due to the presence of a second surgical site. The low manufacturing cost of silicone plate as opposed to other allogenic and synthetic tarsal substitutes makes it readily available to resource limited populations. The silicone plate is reckoned to become the material of choice as tarsal substitute in the future. <b>Abbreviations:</b> AAC = Autogenous auricular cartilage, MRD-1 = Margin reflex distance-1, LPS = levator palpebrae superioris, PFH = palpebral fissure height.</p>","PeriodicalId":21385,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"67 2","pages":"152-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385707/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Salil Kumar Mandal,&nbsp;Anwesha Maitra,&nbsp;Oishik Sarkar,&nbsp;Paulomi Roy,&nbsp;Mousree Gayen,&nbsp;Anamika Paul\",\"doi\":\"10.22336/rjo.2023.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare surgical and functional outcomes, safety, efficacy and cost of silicone plate vs. autogenous auricular cartilage (AAC) as alternate material to tarsal plate for upper eyelid reconstruction after excision of malignant tumor. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective, comparative, interventional study of over 3 years was conducted on two groups of twenty patients each. All the patients had undergone the Modified Cutler Beard procedure with AAC being used as tarsal substitute in one group and a novel silicone plate in the other. Post-operative MRD 1, LPS action, Central Lid Thickness, and Lid contour were recorded at one week, one month and six months follow-up. <b>Results:</b> The pre-operative MRD 1 in the silicone plate and AAC group was -2.95 ± 1.19 mm and -3.05 ± 1(1).05 mm, post-operative in the silicone plate group 3.8 ± 0.4 mm, and in the AAC group, 3.8 ± 0.41 mm. The pre-operative LPS action in the silicone plate and AAC group was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm and post-operative it was 13.8 ± 0.4 mm for the silicone plate group and 13.7 ± 0.4 mm for the AAC group. The post-operative lid thickness for the silicone plate group was 4.4 ± 0.17 mm and for the AAC group it was 4.4 ± 0.08 mm. <b>Conclusion:</b> The cosmetic outcome in terms of lid contour maintenance is better in the silicone plate group, in which it markedly reduces the surgical time, provides earlier rehabilitation, and eliminates disease transmission. Harvesting of AAC is a skillful and time-consuming procedure and adds to the post-operative morbidity due to the presence of a second surgical site. The low manufacturing cost of silicone plate as opposed to other allogenic and synthetic tarsal substitutes makes it readily available to resource limited populations. The silicone plate is reckoned to become the material of choice as tarsal substitute in the future. <b>Abbreviations:</b> AAC = Autogenous auricular cartilage, MRD-1 = Margin reflex distance-1, LPS = levator palpebrae superioris, PFH = palpebral fissure height.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"152-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2023.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2023.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较硅胶板与自体耳软骨(AAC)作为睑板替代材料在恶性肿瘤切除后重建上眼睑的手术和功能结果、安全性、有效性和成本。方法:对两组患者进行为期3年的前瞻性、比较性、介入性研究,每组20例。所有患者都接受了改良Cutler-Beard手术,其中一组使用AAC作为睑板替代品,另一组使用新型硅胶板。术后1周、1个月和6个月随访时记录MRD1、LPS作用、中央盖厚度和盖轮廓。结果:硅胶板和AAC组术前MRD1分别为-2.95±1.19 mm和-3.05±1(1).05 mm,硅胶板组术后MRD1为3.8±0.4 mm,AAC组为3.8±0.41 mm。硅胶板和AAC组术前LPS作用为1.2±1.1 mm和1.0±0.9 mm,硅胶板组术后LPS作用为13.8±0.4 mm,AAC组为13.7±0.4 mm。硅胶板组术后眼睑厚度为4.4±0.17 mm,AAC组为4.4±0.08 mm。结论:硅胶板组在眼睑轮廓维持方面的美容效果更好,显著缩短了手术时间,提供了早期康复,并消除了疾病传播。AAC的采集是一项技术娴熟且耗时的手术,由于存在第二个手术部位,会增加术后发病率。与其他同种异体和合成焦油替代品相比,硅树脂板的制造成本较低,因此资源有限的人群很容易获得硅树脂板。硅树脂板被认为是未来焦油替代品的首选材料。缩写:AAC=自体耳软骨,MRD-1=边缘反射距离-1,LPS=上睑提肌,PFH=睑裂高度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor.

A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor.

A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor.

A comparison of novel silicone plate vs. auricular cartilage in upper eyelid reconstruction following excision of malignant tumor.

Purpose: To compare surgical and functional outcomes, safety, efficacy and cost of silicone plate vs. autogenous auricular cartilage (AAC) as alternate material to tarsal plate for upper eyelid reconstruction after excision of malignant tumor. Methods: A prospective, comparative, interventional study of over 3 years was conducted on two groups of twenty patients each. All the patients had undergone the Modified Cutler Beard procedure with AAC being used as tarsal substitute in one group and a novel silicone plate in the other. Post-operative MRD 1, LPS action, Central Lid Thickness, and Lid contour were recorded at one week, one month and six months follow-up. Results: The pre-operative MRD 1 in the silicone plate and AAC group was -2.95 ± 1.19 mm and -3.05 ± 1(1).05 mm, post-operative in the silicone plate group 3.8 ± 0.4 mm, and in the AAC group, 3.8 ± 0.41 mm. The pre-operative LPS action in the silicone plate and AAC group was 1.2 ± 1.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.9 mm and post-operative it was 13.8 ± 0.4 mm for the silicone plate group and 13.7 ± 0.4 mm for the AAC group. The post-operative lid thickness for the silicone plate group was 4.4 ± 0.17 mm and for the AAC group it was 4.4 ± 0.08 mm. Conclusion: The cosmetic outcome in terms of lid contour maintenance is better in the silicone plate group, in which it markedly reduces the surgical time, provides earlier rehabilitation, and eliminates disease transmission. Harvesting of AAC is a skillful and time-consuming procedure and adds to the post-operative morbidity due to the presence of a second surgical site. The low manufacturing cost of silicone plate as opposed to other allogenic and synthetic tarsal substitutes makes it readily available to resource limited populations. The silicone plate is reckoned to become the material of choice as tarsal substitute in the future. Abbreviations: AAC = Autogenous auricular cartilage, MRD-1 = Margin reflex distance-1, LPS = levator palpebrae superioris, PFH = palpebral fissure height.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信