以个人与家庭为基础的药物使用治疗对青少年自伤思想和行为的比较效果

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lynsay Ayer , Joseph D. Pane , Mark D. Godley , Daniel F. McCaffrey , Lane Burgette , Matthew Cefalu , Brian Vegetabile , Beth Ann Griffin
{"title":"以个人与家庭为基础的药物使用治疗对青少年自伤思想和行为的比较效果","authors":"Lynsay Ayer ,&nbsp;Joseph D. Pane ,&nbsp;Mark D. Godley ,&nbsp;Daniel F. McCaffrey ,&nbsp;Lane Burgette ,&nbsp;Matthew Cefalu ,&nbsp;Brian Vegetabile ,&nbsp;Beth Ann Griffin","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors<span> (SITB) are of increasing concern among adolescents, especially those who use substances. Some evidence suggests that existing evidence-based substance use treatments (EBTs) could impact not only their intended substance use targets but also SITB. However, which types of substance use treatments may have the greatest impact on youth SITB is not yet clear. Based on prior literature showing that family support and connection may buffer youth from SITB, we initially hypothesized that family-based EBTs would show greater improvement in SITB compared to those receiving individually focused EBTs and that the size of the effects would be small given the comparison between two active, evidence-based interventions, and base rates of SITB.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a sample of 2893 youth in substance use treatment, we compared the effectiveness of individually and family-based EBTs in reducing SITBs. The study used entropy balancing and regression modeling to balance the groups on pre-treatment characteristics and examine change in outcomes over a one-year follow-up period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups improved in self-injury and suicide attempts over the one-year study period, but only youth in individual treatment improved in suicidal ideation. However, the study found no significant difference between the changes over time in the two groups for any outcome. As expected, effect sizes were small and power was constrained in this study given the rarity of the outcomes, but effect sizes are similar to those observed with substance use outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results provide important exploratory evidence on the potential relative effectiveness of these two treatments for SITBs. This study supports prior findings that EBTs for youth substance use may help to improve SITB and suggests that different treatment formats (individual or family-based) could result in different benefits for SITB outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 108782"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of individual versus family-based substance use treatment on adolescent self-injurious thoughts and behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Lynsay Ayer ,&nbsp;Joseph D. Pane ,&nbsp;Mark D. Godley ,&nbsp;Daniel F. McCaffrey ,&nbsp;Lane Burgette ,&nbsp;Matthew Cefalu ,&nbsp;Brian Vegetabile ,&nbsp;Beth Ann Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors<span> (SITB) are of increasing concern among adolescents, especially those who use substances. Some evidence suggests that existing evidence-based substance use treatments (EBTs) could impact not only their intended substance use targets but also SITB. However, which types of substance use treatments may have the greatest impact on youth SITB is not yet clear. Based on prior literature showing that family support and connection may buffer youth from SITB, we initially hypothesized that family-based EBTs would show greater improvement in SITB compared to those receiving individually focused EBTs and that the size of the effects would be small given the comparison between two active, evidence-based interventions, and base rates of SITB.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a sample of 2893 youth in substance use treatment, we compared the effectiveness of individually and family-based EBTs in reducing SITBs. The study used entropy balancing and regression modeling to balance the groups on pre-treatment characteristics and examine change in outcomes over a one-year follow-up period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups improved in self-injury and suicide attempts over the one-year study period, but only youth in individual treatment improved in suicidal ideation. However, the study found no significant difference between the changes over time in the two groups for any outcome. As expected, effect sizes were small and power was constrained in this study given the rarity of the outcomes, but effect sizes are similar to those observed with substance use outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results provide important exploratory evidence on the potential relative effectiveness of these two treatments for SITBs. This study supports prior findings that EBTs for youth substance use may help to improve SITB and suggests that different treatment formats (individual or family-based) could result in different benefits for SITB outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000642\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我伤害的想法和行为(SITB)在青少年中越来越受到关注,尤其是那些使用药物的青少年。一些证据表明,现有的循证药物使用治疗(EBTs)不仅可以影响其预期的药物使用目标,还可以影响SITB。然而,哪种类型的药物使用治疗可能对青少年SITB产生最大的影响尚不清楚。基于先前的文献显示,家庭支持和联系可以缓冲青少年的SITB,我们最初假设,与接受个人关注的ebt相比,以家庭为基础的ebt在SITB方面表现出更大的改善,并且考虑到两种积极的、基于证据的干预措施和SITB的基本率之间的比较,效果的大小会很小。方法以2893名接受药物使用治疗的青少年为样本,比较了以个人和家庭为基础的EBTs在减少sitb方面的有效性。该研究使用熵平衡和回归模型来平衡各组的治疗前特征,并在一年的随访期间检查结果的变化。结果在一年的研究期间,两组在自残和自杀企图方面都有所改善,但只有接受个别治疗的青少年在自杀意念方面有所改善。然而,研究发现两组在任何结果上随时间的变化没有显著差异。正如预期的那样,考虑到结果的稀缺性,本研究的效应量很小,而且功率受到限制,但效应量与观察到的物质使用结果相似。结论本研究结果为两种治疗方法治疗sitb的潜在相对疗效提供了重要的探索性证据。这项研究支持了先前的研究结果,即青少年药物使用的EBTs可能有助于改善SITB,并表明不同的治疗形式(个人或家庭为基础)可能对SITB结果产生不同的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative effectiveness of individual versus family-based substance use treatment on adolescent self-injurious thoughts and behaviors

Comparative effectiveness of individual versus family-based substance use treatment on adolescent self-injurious thoughts and behaviors

Introduction

Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) are of increasing concern among adolescents, especially those who use substances. Some evidence suggests that existing evidence-based substance use treatments (EBTs) could impact not only their intended substance use targets but also SITB. However, which types of substance use treatments may have the greatest impact on youth SITB is not yet clear. Based on prior literature showing that family support and connection may buffer youth from SITB, we initially hypothesized that family-based EBTs would show greater improvement in SITB compared to those receiving individually focused EBTs and that the size of the effects would be small given the comparison between two active, evidence-based interventions, and base rates of SITB.

Methods

In a sample of 2893 youth in substance use treatment, we compared the effectiveness of individually and family-based EBTs in reducing SITBs. The study used entropy balancing and regression modeling to balance the groups on pre-treatment characteristics and examine change in outcomes over a one-year follow-up period.

Results

Both groups improved in self-injury and suicide attempts over the one-year study period, but only youth in individual treatment improved in suicidal ideation. However, the study found no significant difference between the changes over time in the two groups for any outcome. As expected, effect sizes were small and power was constrained in this study given the rarity of the outcomes, but effect sizes are similar to those observed with substance use outcomes.

Conclusions

The results provide important exploratory evidence on the potential relative effectiveness of these two treatments for SITBs. This study supports prior findings that EBTs for youth substance use may help to improve SITB and suggests that different treatment formats (individual or family-based) could result in different benefits for SITB outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信