睡眠成像环和多导睡眠图诊断阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的比较研究。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Biomedical Engineering Letters Pub Date : 2023-07-17 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9
Mi Lu, Lisa Brenzinger, Lisa Rosenblum, Matthew Salanitro, Ingo Fietze, Martin Glos, Giuseppe Fico, Thomas Penzel
{"title":"睡眠成像环和多导睡眠图诊断阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的比较研究。","authors":"Mi Lu, Lisa Brenzinger, Lisa Rosenblum, Matthew Salanitro, Ingo Fietze, Martin Glos, Giuseppe Fico, Thomas Penzel","doi":"10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i> We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SleepImage Ring device in identifying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) across different severity in comparison to standard polysomnography (PSG). <i>Methods</i> Thirty-nine patients (mean age, 56.8 ± 15.0 years; 29 [74.3%] males) were measured with the SleepImage Ring and PSG study simultaneously in order to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SleepImage device for diagnosing OSA. Variables such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated with PSG-AHI thresholds of 5, 15, and 30 events/h. Receiver operating characteristic curves were also built according to the above PSG-AHI thresholds. In addition, we analyzed the correlation and agreement between the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) obtained from the two measurement devices. <i>Results</i> There was a strong correlation (r = 0.89, <i>P</i> < 0.001 and high agreement in AHI between the SleepImage Ring and standard PSG. Also, the SleepImage Ring showed reliable diagnostic capability, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.91, 1.00), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77, 0.97), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.88, 1.000) for corresponding PSG-AHI of 5, 15 and 30 events/h, respectively. <i>Conclusion</i> The SleepImage Ring could be a clinically reliable and cheaper alternative to the gold standard PSG when aiming to diagnose OSA in adults.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"13 3","pages":"343-352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of the SleepImage ring device and polysomnography for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea.\",\"authors\":\"Mi Lu, Lisa Brenzinger, Lisa Rosenblum, Matthew Salanitro, Ingo Fietze, Martin Glos, Giuseppe Fico, Thomas Penzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose</i> We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SleepImage Ring device in identifying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) across different severity in comparison to standard polysomnography (PSG). <i>Methods</i> Thirty-nine patients (mean age, 56.8 ± 15.0 years; 29 [74.3%] males) were measured with the SleepImage Ring and PSG study simultaneously in order to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SleepImage device for diagnosing OSA. Variables such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated with PSG-AHI thresholds of 5, 15, and 30 events/h. Receiver operating characteristic curves were also built according to the above PSG-AHI thresholds. In addition, we analyzed the correlation and agreement between the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) obtained from the two measurement devices. <i>Results</i> There was a strong correlation (r = 0.89, <i>P</i> < 0.001 and high agreement in AHI between the SleepImage Ring and standard PSG. Also, the SleepImage Ring showed reliable diagnostic capability, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.91, 1.00), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77, 0.97), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.88, 1.000) for corresponding PSG-AHI of 5, 15 and 30 events/h, respectively. <i>Conclusion</i> The SleepImage Ring could be a clinically reliable and cheaper alternative to the gold standard PSG when aiming to diagnose OSA in adults.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"343-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与标准多导睡眠图(PSG)相比,我们旨在评估SleepImage Ring设备在识别不同严重程度的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)方面的诊断性能。方法39例患者(平均年龄56.8岁) ± 15.0年;29名[74.3%]男性)同时用SleepImage Ring和PSG研究进行测量,以评估SleepImage设备诊断OSA的诊断性能。使用PSG-AHI阈值5、15和30次事件/h来计算敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比、阳性和阳性预测值以及准确性等变量。还根据上述PSG-AHI阈值建立了接收器工作特性曲线。此外,我们还分析了从两种测量设备获得的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)之间的相关性和一致性。结果二者之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.89,P 结论SleepImage Ring可作为诊断成人OSA的金标准PSG的临床可靠且廉价的替代品。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of the SleepImage ring device and polysomnography for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea.

Purpose We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SleepImage Ring device in identifying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) across different severity in comparison to standard polysomnography (PSG). Methods Thirty-nine patients (mean age, 56.8 ± 15.0 years; 29 [74.3%] males) were measured with the SleepImage Ring and PSG study simultaneously in order to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SleepImage device for diagnosing OSA. Variables such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated with PSG-AHI thresholds of 5, 15, and 30 events/h. Receiver operating characteristic curves were also built according to the above PSG-AHI thresholds. In addition, we analyzed the correlation and agreement between the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) obtained from the two measurement devices. Results There was a strong correlation (r = 0.89, P < 0.001 and high agreement in AHI between the SleepImage Ring and standard PSG. Also, the SleepImage Ring showed reliable diagnostic capability, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.91, 1.00), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77, 0.97), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.88, 1.000) for corresponding PSG-AHI of 5, 15 and 30 events/h, respectively. Conclusion The SleepImage Ring could be a clinically reliable and cheaper alternative to the gold standard PSG when aiming to diagnose OSA in adults.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-023-00304-9.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Engineering Letters
Biomedical Engineering Letters ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信