斯堪的纳维亚在线癌症信息作为治理的表达:一项比较定性研究。

IF 1.6 4区医学 Q2 NURSING

Advances in Nursing Science Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436

Elin Margrethe Aasen, Berit Misund Dahl, Aase Marie Ottesen, Jeanne Strunck, Henrik Erikson, Elisabeth Dahlborg, Åse Boman, Lisbeth Alnes Vestgarden, Ellinor Tengelin

{"title":"斯堪的纳维亚在线癌症信息作为治理的表达:一项比较定性研究。","authors":"Elin Margrethe Aasen, Berit Misund Dahl, Aase Marie Ottesen, Jeanne Strunck, Henrik Erikson, Elisabeth Dahlborg, Åse Boman, Lisbeth Alnes Vestgarden, Ellinor Tengelin","doi":"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared online distributed information provided to patients with cancer in Scandinavian countries through the lens of governmentality. A secondary comparative qualitative analysis was conducted. Discourses in online patient information showed differences in governmentality techniques across the countries: Norway used a paternalist approach, Denmark an educative approach, and Sweden an individualistic approach and expected the patients to make the \"right\" decisions. Online information for patients with cancer in Denmark and Norway showed high professional and health care system involvement, whereas in Sweden, there was high patient involvement. There was almost no use of the person-centered approach among the online discourses.","PeriodicalId":50857,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nursing Science","volume":"46 3","pages":"293-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scandinavian Online Cancer Information as Expressions of Governmentality: A Comparative Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elin Margrethe Aasen, Berit Misund Dahl, Aase Marie Ottesen, Jeanne Strunck, Henrik Erikson, Elisabeth Dahlborg, Åse Boman, Lisbeth Alnes Vestgarden, Ellinor Tengelin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compared online distributed information provided to patients with cancer in Scandinavian countries through the lens of governmentality. A secondary comparative qualitative analysis was conducted. Discourses in online patient information showed differences in governmentality techniques across the countries: Norway used a paternalist approach, Denmark an educative approach, and Sweden an individualistic approach and expected the patients to make the \\\"right\\\" decisions. Online information for patients with cancer in Denmark and Norway showed high professional and health care system involvement, whereas in Sweden, there was high patient involvement. There was almost no use of the person-centered approach among the online discourses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Nursing Science\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"293-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Nursing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

我们比较了斯堪的纳维亚国家通过政府管理向癌症患者提供的在线分布信息。进行二次比较定性分析。在线患者信息的论述显示了不同国家治理技术的差异:挪威采用家长式方法，丹麦采用教育方法，瑞典采用个人主义方法，并期望患者做出“正确”的决定。丹麦和挪威癌症患者的在线信息显示，专业人员和卫生保健系统的参与度很高，而在瑞典，患者参与度很高。在线讨论中几乎没有使用以人为本的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Scandinavian Online Cancer Information as Expressions of Governmentality: A Comparative Qualitative Study.

We compared online distributed information provided to patients with cancer in Scandinavian countries through the lens of governmentality. A secondary comparative qualitative analysis was conducted. Discourses in online patient information showed differences in governmentality techniques across the countries: Norway used a paternalist approach, Denmark an educative approach, and Sweden an individualistic approach and expected the patients to make the "right" decisions. Online information for patients with cancer in Denmark and Norway showed high professional and health care system involvement, whereas in Sweden, there was high patient involvement. There was almost no use of the person-centered approach among the online discourses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Advances in Nursing Science 医学-护理

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

6.20%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Consistently ranked as one of the most-read and most assigned journals by faculties of graduate programs in nursing, Advances in Nursing Science (ANS) is intellectually challenging, innovative and progressive, and features articles from a wide range of scholarly traditions. The journal particularly encourages works that speak to the need for global sustainability and that take an intersectional approach, recognizing class, color, sexual and gender identity, and other dimensions of human experience related to health. Articles in ANS are peer-reviewed and chosen for their pioneering perspectives and for their significance in contributing the evolution of the discipline of nursing.