Mahathi Vojjala, Christina N Wysota, Ololade Oketunbi, Quiann King, Erin S Rogers
{"title":"将“戒烟并保持周一戒烟”模式融入有精神健康状况的吸烟者的戒烟服务:一项试点随机对照试验。","authors":"Mahathi Vojjala, Christina N Wysota, Ololade Oketunbi, Quiann King, Erin S Rogers","doi":"10.1155/2023/8165232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with mental health conditions (MHCs) are less likely to achieve long-term abstinence than people without MHCs. The Quit and Stay Quit Monday (<i>QSQM</i>) model offers a long-term approach to treating tobacco use by encouraging people to quit, requit, or recommit to quit smoking every Monday.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy, patient satisfaction, and patient engagement with an intervention that integrated the <i>QSQM</i> model into multicomponent smoking cessation services among people with an MHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled pilot trial. Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) ≥18 years old, (2) smoked a cigarette in the past 30 days, (3) diagnosis of an ICD-10 MHC, (4) interest in quitting smoking, (5) able to receive services in English, and (5) had an active email and a cell phone. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 33) received <i>QSQM</i>-focused telephone coaching, a weekly <i>QSQM</i> email newsletter, a SmokefreeTXT anchored around a Monday quit date, and 4 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). The control group (<i>n</i> = 36) received information about contacting their state Quitline for usual services. Primary outcomes were self-reported quit attempts, 7-day abstinence, and intervention satisfaction at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four participants (73%) in the intervention group began telephone coaching, 26 (79%) enrolled in the <i>QSQM</i> email newsletter, 19 (58%) enrolled in SmokefreeTXT, and 15 (46%) used NRT. Using a penalized intent-to-treat approach, quit attempts in the intervention and control groups were 63.6% and 38.9% (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.03-7.30), respectively. Seven-day abstinence in the two groups was 12.1% and 5.6% (OR 2.35, 95% CI 0.40-13.74), respectively. Of the 15 intervention group participants who set a quit date during the intervention, 13 (86.7%) selected a Monday quit day. Qualitative interviews revealed positive participant experiences with picking a Monday quit day. On follow-up surveys, 89.5%, 69.3%, and 64.3% of intervention participants reported that the counseling, <i>QSQM</i> email, and text messaging, respectively, were very or somewhat helpful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The <i>QSQM</i> model was acceptable and potentially efficacious among people with MHCs, but intervention engagement and satisfaction were modest. Future research should adapt or develop new <i>QSQM</i> delivery approaches to improve patient engagement and potential efficacy of the model. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04512248).</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"2023 ","pages":"8165232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating the \\\"Quit and Stay Quit Monday\\\" Model into Smoking Cessation Services for Smokers with Mental Health Conditions: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mahathi Vojjala, Christina N Wysota, Ololade Oketunbi, Quiann King, Erin S Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8165232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with mental health conditions (MHCs) are less likely to achieve long-term abstinence than people without MHCs. The Quit and Stay Quit Monday (<i>QSQM</i>) model offers a long-term approach to treating tobacco use by encouraging people to quit, requit, or recommit to quit smoking every Monday.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy, patient satisfaction, and patient engagement with an intervention that integrated the <i>QSQM</i> model into multicomponent smoking cessation services among people with an MHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled pilot trial. Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) ≥18 years old, (2) smoked a cigarette in the past 30 days, (3) diagnosis of an ICD-10 MHC, (4) interest in quitting smoking, (5) able to receive services in English, and (5) had an active email and a cell phone. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 33) received <i>QSQM</i>-focused telephone coaching, a weekly <i>QSQM</i> email newsletter, a SmokefreeTXT anchored around a Monday quit date, and 4 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). The control group (<i>n</i> = 36) received information about contacting their state Quitline for usual services. Primary outcomes were self-reported quit attempts, 7-day abstinence, and intervention satisfaction at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four participants (73%) in the intervention group began telephone coaching, 26 (79%) enrolled in the <i>QSQM</i> email newsletter, 19 (58%) enrolled in SmokefreeTXT, and 15 (46%) used NRT. Using a penalized intent-to-treat approach, quit attempts in the intervention and control groups were 63.6% and 38.9% (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.03-7.30), respectively. Seven-day abstinence in the two groups was 12.1% and 5.6% (OR 2.35, 95% CI 0.40-13.74), respectively. Of the 15 intervention group participants who set a quit date during the intervention, 13 (86.7%) selected a Monday quit day. Qualitative interviews revealed positive participant experiences with picking a Monday quit day. On follow-up surveys, 89.5%, 69.3%, and 64.3% of intervention participants reported that the counseling, <i>QSQM</i> email, and text messaging, respectively, were very or somewhat helpful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The <i>QSQM</i> model was acceptable and potentially efficacious among people with MHCs, but intervention engagement and satisfaction were modest. Future research should adapt or develop new <i>QSQM</i> delivery approaches to improve patient engagement and potential efficacy of the model. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04512248).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"8165232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10386896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8165232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8165232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有精神健康状况(MHCs)的人比没有MHCs的人更不可能实现长期禁欲。“周一戒烟并保持戒烟”(QSQM)模式通过鼓励人们每周一戒烟、重新戒烟或再次戒烟,为治疗烟草使用提供了一种长期方法。目的:评估将QSQM模型整合到MHC患者多成分戒烟服务中的干预措施的疗效、患者满意度和患者参与度。方法:采用随机对照先导试验。入选标准如下:(1)年龄≥18岁,(2)过去30天内吸过一支烟,(3)诊断为ICD-10 MHC,(4)有戒烟兴趣,(5)能够接受英语服务,(5)有活跃的电子邮件和手机。干预组(n = 33)接受了以QSQM为重点的电话指导,每周一次的QSQM电子邮件通讯,每周一的戒烟日期,以及为期4周的尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)。对照组(n = 36)收到关于联系其所在州戒烟热线进行日常服务的信息。主要结果是自我报告的戒烟尝试,7天的戒断,以及3个月时的干预满意度。结果:干预组24名参与者(73%)开始电话指导,26名参与者(79%)参加了QSQM电子邮件通讯,19名参与者(58%)参加了无烟运动,15名参与者(46%)使用了NRT。使用惩罚的意向治疗方法,干预组和对照组的戒烟尝试分别为63.6%和38.9% (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.03-7.30)。两组7天戒断率分别为12.1%和5.6% (OR 2.35, 95% CI 0.40-13.74)。在干预期间设定戒烟日期的15名干预组参与者中,有13人(86.7%)选择周一戒烟。定性访谈揭示了参与者选择周一戒烟的积极体验。在后续调查中,89.5%、69.3%和64.3%的干预参与者分别报告咨询、QSQM电子邮件和短信非常或有些帮助。结论:在MHCs患者中,QSQM模型是可接受的,并且可能有效,但干预参与和满意度不高。未来的研究应适应或开发新的QSQM交付方法,以提高患者参与度和模型的潜在功效。该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT04512248)。
Integrating the "Quit and Stay Quit Monday" Model into Smoking Cessation Services for Smokers with Mental Health Conditions: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Introduction: People with mental health conditions (MHCs) are less likely to achieve long-term abstinence than people without MHCs. The Quit and Stay Quit Monday (QSQM) model offers a long-term approach to treating tobacco use by encouraging people to quit, requit, or recommit to quit smoking every Monday.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy, patient satisfaction, and patient engagement with an intervention that integrated the QSQM model into multicomponent smoking cessation services among people with an MHC.
Methods: This was a randomized controlled pilot trial. Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) ≥18 years old, (2) smoked a cigarette in the past 30 days, (3) diagnosis of an ICD-10 MHC, (4) interest in quitting smoking, (5) able to receive services in English, and (5) had an active email and a cell phone. The intervention group (n = 33) received QSQM-focused telephone coaching, a weekly QSQM email newsletter, a SmokefreeTXT anchored around a Monday quit date, and 4 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). The control group (n = 36) received information about contacting their state Quitline for usual services. Primary outcomes were self-reported quit attempts, 7-day abstinence, and intervention satisfaction at 3 months.
Results: Twenty-four participants (73%) in the intervention group began telephone coaching, 26 (79%) enrolled in the QSQM email newsletter, 19 (58%) enrolled in SmokefreeTXT, and 15 (46%) used NRT. Using a penalized intent-to-treat approach, quit attempts in the intervention and control groups were 63.6% and 38.9% (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.03-7.30), respectively. Seven-day abstinence in the two groups was 12.1% and 5.6% (OR 2.35, 95% CI 0.40-13.74), respectively. Of the 15 intervention group participants who set a quit date during the intervention, 13 (86.7%) selected a Monday quit day. Qualitative interviews revealed positive participant experiences with picking a Monday quit day. On follow-up surveys, 89.5%, 69.3%, and 64.3% of intervention participants reported that the counseling, QSQM email, and text messaging, respectively, were very or somewhat helpful.
Conclusions: The QSQM model was acceptable and potentially efficacious among people with MHCs, but intervention engagement and satisfaction were modest. Future research should adapt or develop new QSQM delivery approaches to improve patient engagement and potential efficacy of the model. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04512248).