这里是危险边缘!一个灵活的覆盖为基础的时间表模型,以解决健康的病理培训计划

IF 1.2 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Jason V. Scapa MD, Bita V. Naini MD, Sheeja Pullarkat MD, Peggy S. Sullivan MD
{"title":"这里是危险边缘!一个灵活的覆盖为基础的时间表模型,以解决健康的病理培训计划","authors":"Jason V. Scapa MD,&nbsp;Bita V. Naini MD,&nbsp;Sheeja Pullarkat MD,&nbsp;Peggy S. Sullivan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scheduling rotations for a pathology training program involves balancing educational requirements, service coverage, and paid time off (PTO). Absences can affect training as residents cross-cover, managing multiple services at once. Other specialties utilize a “Jeopardy” based system for covering absences. In this system, residents on outpatient services are “jeopardized” to cover inpatient services for trainee absences. Borrowing this concept, we created a schedule model with a “Jeopardy-Elective” (JE) rotation to support resident absences. Prior to 2018–19, our residency program consisted of a 12 month-long rotation schedule. We adopted a 13 four-week block rotation model system, adding four JE rotations per resident over the course of training. The JE resident covered services during trainee absences and spent the remaining rotation on elective. We then conducted a pre- and post-intervention survey of all residents who trained in both systems. Following the change in schedule model, our results showed a statistically significant increase in resident satisfaction with taking PTO (p = 0.0014), finding coverage (p = 0.0006), and taking a sick day (p = 0.03). The mean number of days covered by the JE resident was 8.5 ± 2.7 workdays (out of 20). PTO usage increased from 16 to 20 days/resident while mean number of sick days decreased from 1.7 to 1.3 days per resident. There was overwhelming support with 82% of residents wanting to retain the new system going forward. Through use of the JE rotation, our program improved service coverage issues and resident satisfaction, with the long-term goal of enhanced resident well-being and enriched resident learning experiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44927,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"This is Jeopardy! A flexible coverage-based schedule model to address wellness for pathology training programs\",\"authors\":\"Jason V. Scapa MD,&nbsp;Bita V. Naini MD,&nbsp;Sheeja Pullarkat MD,&nbsp;Peggy S. Sullivan MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Scheduling rotations for a pathology training program involves balancing educational requirements, service coverage, and paid time off (PTO). Absences can affect training as residents cross-cover, managing multiple services at once. Other specialties utilize a “Jeopardy” based system for covering absences. In this system, residents on outpatient services are “jeopardized” to cover inpatient services for trainee absences. Borrowing this concept, we created a schedule model with a “Jeopardy-Elective” (JE) rotation to support resident absences. Prior to 2018–19, our residency program consisted of a 12 month-long rotation schedule. We adopted a 13 four-week block rotation model system, adding four JE rotations per resident over the course of training. The JE resident covered services during trainee absences and spent the remaining rotation on elective. We then conducted a pre- and post-intervention survey of all residents who trained in both systems. Following the change in schedule model, our results showed a statistically significant increase in resident satisfaction with taking PTO (p = 0.0014), finding coverage (p = 0.0006), and taking a sick day (p = 0.03). The mean number of days covered by the JE resident was 8.5 ± 2.7 workdays (out of 20). PTO usage increased from 16 to 20 days/resident while mean number of sick days decreased from 1.7 to 1.3 days per resident. There was overwhelming support with 82% of residents wanting to retain the new system going forward. Through use of the JE rotation, our program improved service coverage issues and resident satisfaction, with the long-term goal of enhanced resident well-being and enriched resident learning experiences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289523000192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289523000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安排病理学培训项目的轮调包括平衡教育要求、服务范围和带薪休假(PTO)。缺勤可能会影响培训,因为住院医生会交叉覆盖,同时管理多个服务。其他专业使用基于“危险边缘”的系统来弥补缺席。在这一制度中,门诊服务的居民被“危害”为实习生缺勤提供住院服务。借用这一概念,我们创建了一个带有“危险选修课”(JE)轮换的时间表模型,以支持居民缺勤。在2018-19年之前,我们的实习计划包括为期12个月的轮换计划。我们采用了13个为期四周的分组轮换模型系统,在训练过程中每个居民增加了4个JE轮换。JE居民在学员缺席期间提供服务,并在剩余的轮换中用于选修课。然后,我们对所有接受过这两种系统培训的居民进行了干预前和干预后的调查。根据时间表模型的变化,我们的结果显示,居民对服用PTO(p=0.0014)、寻找覆盖范围(p=0.0006)和请病假(p=0.03)的满意度在统计学上显著提高。乙脑居民的平均天数为8.5±2.7个工作日(共20天)。PTO使用量从每位居民16天增加到20天,而平均病假天数从每位居民1.7天减少到1.3天。82%的居民希望继续保留新系统,这得到了压倒性的支持。通过使用JE轮调,我们的项目改善了服务覆盖问题和居民满意度,长期目标是提高居民福祉,丰富居民学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

This is Jeopardy! A flexible coverage-based schedule model to address wellness for pathology training programs

This is Jeopardy! A flexible coverage-based schedule model to address wellness for pathology training programs

This is Jeopardy! A flexible coverage-based schedule model to address wellness for pathology training programs

This is Jeopardy! A flexible coverage-based schedule model to address wellness for pathology training programs

Scheduling rotations for a pathology training program involves balancing educational requirements, service coverage, and paid time off (PTO). Absences can affect training as residents cross-cover, managing multiple services at once. Other specialties utilize a “Jeopardy” based system for covering absences. In this system, residents on outpatient services are “jeopardized” to cover inpatient services for trainee absences. Borrowing this concept, we created a schedule model with a “Jeopardy-Elective” (JE) rotation to support resident absences. Prior to 2018–19, our residency program consisted of a 12 month-long rotation schedule. We adopted a 13 four-week block rotation model system, adding four JE rotations per resident over the course of training. The JE resident covered services during trainee absences and spent the remaining rotation on elective. We then conducted a pre- and post-intervention survey of all residents who trained in both systems. Following the change in schedule model, our results showed a statistically significant increase in resident satisfaction with taking PTO (p = 0.0014), finding coverage (p = 0.0006), and taking a sick day (p = 0.03). The mean number of days covered by the JE resident was 8.5 ± 2.7 workdays (out of 20). PTO usage increased from 16 to 20 days/resident while mean number of sick days decreased from 1.7 to 1.3 days per resident. There was overwhelming support with 82% of residents wanting to retain the new system going forward. Through use of the JE rotation, our program improved service coverage issues and resident satisfaction, with the long-term goal of enhanced resident well-being and enriched resident learning experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pathology
Academic Pathology PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Pathology is an open access journal sponsored by the Association of Pathology Chairs, established to give voice to the innovations in leadership and management of academic departments of Pathology. These innovations may have impact across the breadth of pathology and laboratory medicine practice. Academic Pathology addresses methods for improving patient care (clinical informatics, genomic testing and data management, lab automation, electronic health record integration, and annotate biorepositories); best practices in inter-professional clinical partnerships; innovative pedagogical approaches to medical education and educational program evaluation in pathology; models for training academic pathologists and advancing academic career development; administrative and organizational models supporting the discipline; and leadership development in academic medical centers, health systems, and other relevant venues. Intended authorship and audiences for Academic Pathology are international and reach beyond academic pathology itself, including but not limited to healthcare providers, educators, researchers, and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信