"这和左撇子一样了不起,不是吗?":从澳大利亚物理治疗师与 LGBTQIA+ 患者合作的角度探讨规范性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-31 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2241079
Megan H Ross, Calum Neish, Jenny Setchell
{"title":"\"这和左撇子一样了不起,不是吗?\":从澳大利亚物理治疗师与 LGBTQIA+ 患者合作的角度探讨规范性。","authors":"Megan H Ross, Calum Neish, Jenny Setchell","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2241079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual and other related identities (LGBTQIA+) experience challenges with healthcare, including physiotherapy. To understand potential contributions to poor experiences, this study explored physiotherapists' experiences and perspectives about working with members of LGBTQIA+ communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a qualitative research design, suitable for exploring the experiences and perspectives of individuals within the physiotherapy context. The sample consisted of physiotherapists working in Australia who participated in a larger survey study. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was conducted using a relativistic and queer theoretical framework with a reflexive thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen physiotherapists with diverse sexual orientations participated in the interviews. While all participants identified as women or men, not all used binary gender pronouns. Five key themes were developed: 1) \"anti-discrimination\" regarding choice of language and providing safe environments; 2) \"current and historical discrimination\" against LGBTQIA+ individuals; 3) \"taking an equality approach\" when working with LGBTQIA+ patients; 4) \"knowledge of LGBTQIA+ health\" in a broad sense and specifically with transgender and gender-diverse people; and 5) \"managing own reactions\" with respect to individual biases and discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Underpinning all themes was the overarching concept of cis/hetero/endonormativity. Assuming normativity when working with LGBTQIA+ patients, is likely to have negative effects on patients' mental health, the therapeutic relationship and quality of care. In order to improve diversity, safety, inclusion and equity of care for LGBTQIA+ individuals, it is vital that normativity within physiotherapy is challenged.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2309-2320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It's just as remarkable as being left-handed, isn't it?\\\": exploring normativity through Australian physiotherapists' perspectives of working with LGBTQIA+ patients.\",\"authors\":\"Megan H Ross, Calum Neish, Jenny Setchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2241079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual and other related identities (LGBTQIA+) experience challenges with healthcare, including physiotherapy. To understand potential contributions to poor experiences, this study explored physiotherapists' experiences and perspectives about working with members of LGBTQIA+ communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a qualitative research design, suitable for exploring the experiences and perspectives of individuals within the physiotherapy context. The sample consisted of physiotherapists working in Australia who participated in a larger survey study. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was conducted using a relativistic and queer theoretical framework with a reflexive thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen physiotherapists with diverse sexual orientations participated in the interviews. While all participants identified as women or men, not all used binary gender pronouns. Five key themes were developed: 1) \\\"anti-discrimination\\\" regarding choice of language and providing safe environments; 2) \\\"current and historical discrimination\\\" against LGBTQIA+ individuals; 3) \\\"taking an equality approach\\\" when working with LGBTQIA+ patients; 4) \\\"knowledge of LGBTQIA+ health\\\" in a broad sense and specifically with transgender and gender-diverse people; and 5) \\\"managing own reactions\\\" with respect to individual biases and discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Underpinning all themes was the overarching concept of cis/hetero/endonormativity. Assuming normativity when working with LGBTQIA+ patients, is likely to have negative effects on patients' mental health, the therapeutic relationship and quality of care. In order to improve diversity, safety, inclusion and equity of care for LGBTQIA+ individuals, it is vital that normativity within physiotherapy is challenged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2309-2320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2241079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2241079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:被认定为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者、双性人、无性人及其他相关身份的人(LGBTQIA+)在医疗保健方面(包括物理治疗)会遇到各种挑战。为了解造成不良经历的潜在原因,本研究探讨了物理治疗师与 LGBTQIA+ 群体成员合作的经历和观点:本研究采用了定性研究设计,适合在物理治疗环境中探索个人的经验和观点。样本包括在澳大利亚工作的物理治疗师,他们参与了一项规模更大的调查研究。数据通过半结构化访谈收集,并进行了录音和逐字转录。数据分析采用了相对主义和同性恋理论框架以及反思性主题方法:18 名具有不同性取向的物理治疗师参与了访谈。虽然所有参与者都认为自己是女性或男性,但并非所有人都使用二元性别代词。形成了五个关键主题1)关于语言选择和提供安全环境的 "反歧视";2)针对 LGBTQIA+ 个人的 "当前和历史歧视";3)在与 LGBTQIA+ 患者合作时 "采取平等的方法";4)广义上的 "LGBTQIA+ 健康知识",特别是针对变性人和性别多元化人群;5)针对个人偏见和不适 "管理自己的反应":所有主题的基础都是 "顺性/异性/反常性 "这一重要概念。在与 LGBTQIA+ 患者共事时,假设规范性可能会对患者的心理健康、治疗关系和护理质量产生负面影响。为了提高 LGBTQIA+ 患者的多样性、安全性、包容性和护理公平性,必须对物理治疗中的规范性提出挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"It's just as remarkable as being left-handed, isn't it?": exploring normativity through Australian physiotherapists' perspectives of working with LGBTQIA+ patients.

Introduction: Individuals identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual and other related identities (LGBTQIA+) experience challenges with healthcare, including physiotherapy. To understand potential contributions to poor experiences, this study explored physiotherapists' experiences and perspectives about working with members of LGBTQIA+ communities.

Methods: This study employed a qualitative research design, suitable for exploring the experiences and perspectives of individuals within the physiotherapy context. The sample consisted of physiotherapists working in Australia who participated in a larger survey study. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was conducted using a relativistic and queer theoretical framework with a reflexive thematic approach.

Results: Eighteen physiotherapists with diverse sexual orientations participated in the interviews. While all participants identified as women or men, not all used binary gender pronouns. Five key themes were developed: 1) "anti-discrimination" regarding choice of language and providing safe environments; 2) "current and historical discrimination" against LGBTQIA+ individuals; 3) "taking an equality approach" when working with LGBTQIA+ patients; 4) "knowledge of LGBTQIA+ health" in a broad sense and specifically with transgender and gender-diverse people; and 5) "managing own reactions" with respect to individual biases and discomfort.

Conclusion: Underpinning all themes was the overarching concept of cis/hetero/endonormativity. Assuming normativity when working with LGBTQIA+ patients, is likely to have negative effects on patients' mental health, the therapeutic relationship and quality of care. In order to improve diversity, safety, inclusion and equity of care for LGBTQIA+ individuals, it is vital that normativity within physiotherapy is challenged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信