{"title":"比较即刻种植体植入的软组织容积变化和粉红色美学效果(牙槽盾和传统技术):随机对照试验。","authors":"Nallaiah Venkatraman P, Veena Jain, Aditi Nanda, Dheeraj Kumar Koli","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare soft tissue volumetric changes on buccal aspect and pink aesthetics score in immediate implant placement by socket shield and conventional technique.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial included 22 participants requiring replacement of single maxillary incisor by immediate implant placement. Immediate implants were placed with socket shield technique (SST) and conventional technique (CT) in respective two groups after randomization. All implants were immediately loaded by immediate loading protocol. Definitive crowns were placed 6 months after implant placement. Scans of casts were recorded by using a digital white light scanner before implant placement and at the end of 12 months. Volumetric soft tissue changes on the buccal aspect was assessed by the superimposition of scanned cast. Esthetic evaluation of soft tissue was done by using pink esthetic score (PES) before implant placement, 6 months, and 12 months after implant placement. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using statistical software (Stata 16.0; Stata Corp LLC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean soft tissue volumetric change on the buccal aspect at the end of 12 months in the SST group was -0.1520 ±0.86 mm, and in the CT group was -0.643 ±0.35 mm and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i>=.001). Higher PES was observed in the SST group when compared to the CT group at all time intervals. The difference was statistically significant at 6 months (<i>P</i>=.001) and 12 months (<i>P</i>=.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study show less volumetric change on the buccal aspect and higher PES in SST when compared to CT. Int J Prosthodont 2023. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8063.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of soft tissue volumetric changes and pink aesthetics in immediate implant placement by socket shield and conventional technique: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nallaiah Venkatraman P, Veena Jain, Aditi Nanda, Dheeraj Kumar Koli\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare soft tissue volumetric changes on buccal aspect and pink aesthetics score in immediate implant placement by socket shield and conventional technique.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial included 22 participants requiring replacement of single maxillary incisor by immediate implant placement. Immediate implants were placed with socket shield technique (SST) and conventional technique (CT) in respective two groups after randomization. All implants were immediately loaded by immediate loading protocol. Definitive crowns were placed 6 months after implant placement. Scans of casts were recorded by using a digital white light scanner before implant placement and at the end of 12 months. Volumetric soft tissue changes on the buccal aspect was assessed by the superimposition of scanned cast. Esthetic evaluation of soft tissue was done by using pink esthetic score (PES) before implant placement, 6 months, and 12 months after implant placement. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using statistical software (Stata 16.0; Stata Corp LLC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean soft tissue volumetric change on the buccal aspect at the end of 12 months in the SST group was -0.1520 ±0.86 mm, and in the CT group was -0.643 ±0.35 mm and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i>=.001). Higher PES was observed in the SST group when compared to the CT group at all time intervals. The difference was statistically significant at 6 months (<i>P</i>=.001) and 12 months (<i>P</i>=.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study show less volumetric change on the buccal aspect and higher PES in SST when compared to CT. Int J Prosthodont 2023. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8063.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of soft tissue volumetric changes and pink aesthetics in immediate implant placement by socket shield and conventional technique: A randomized controlled trial.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare soft tissue volumetric changes on buccal aspect and pink aesthetics score in immediate implant placement by socket shield and conventional technique.
Material and methods: This parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial included 22 participants requiring replacement of single maxillary incisor by immediate implant placement. Immediate implants were placed with socket shield technique (SST) and conventional technique (CT) in respective two groups after randomization. All implants were immediately loaded by immediate loading protocol. Definitive crowns were placed 6 months after implant placement. Scans of casts were recorded by using a digital white light scanner before implant placement and at the end of 12 months. Volumetric soft tissue changes on the buccal aspect was assessed by the superimposition of scanned cast. Esthetic evaluation of soft tissue was done by using pink esthetic score (PES) before implant placement, 6 months, and 12 months after implant placement. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using statistical software (Stata 16.0; Stata Corp LLC).
Results: The mean soft tissue volumetric change on the buccal aspect at the end of 12 months in the SST group was -0.1520 ±0.86 mm, and in the CT group was -0.643 ±0.35 mm and the difference was statistically significant (P=.001). Higher PES was observed in the SST group when compared to the CT group at all time intervals. The difference was statistically significant at 6 months (P=.001) and 12 months (P=.007).
Conclusions: The results of the study show less volumetric change on the buccal aspect and higher PES in SST when compared to CT. Int J Prosthodont 2023. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8063.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP)
Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.