重症监护后综合征的严重程度分类和影响变量

M.A. Narváez-Martínez , Á.M. Henao-Castaño
{"title":"重症监护后综合征的严重程度分类和影响变量","authors":"M.A. Narváez-Martínez ,&nbsp;Á.M. Henao-Castaño","doi":"10.1016/j.enfie.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study aims to characterise Postintensive Care Syndrome by classifying the severity of the disease and identifying the variables of influence in two highly complex intensive care units for adults in Colombia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective study was carried out to characterise survivors of critical illness<span> using the Healthy Aging<span> Brain Care –Monitor in a sample of 135 patients. Postintensive Care Syndrome severity was classified using Gaussian Mixture Models for clustering, and the most influencing variables were identified through ordinal logistic regression.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clustering based on Gaussian Mixture Models allowed the classification of Postintensive Care Syndrome severity into mild, moderate, and severe classes, with an Akaike Information Criterion of 308 and an area under the curve<span> of 0.80, which indicates a good fit; Thus, the mild class was characterised by a score on the HABC-M Total scale ≤9; the moderate class for a HABC-M Total score ≥10 and ≤42 and the severe class for a HABC-M Total score ≥43. Regarding the most influencing variables, the probability of belonging to the moderate or severe classes was related to male sex (91%), APACHE II score (22.5%), age (13%), intensive care units days of stay (10.6%), the use of sedation, analgesia<span> and neuromuscular blockers.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intensive care units survivors were characterised using the Healthy Aging Brain Care–Monitor scale, which made it possible to classify Postintensive Care Syndrome through Gaussian Mixture Models clustering into mild, moderate, and severe and to identify variables that had the major influence on the presentation of Postintensive Care Syndrome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93991,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria intensiva","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severity classification and influencing variables of the Postintensive Care Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"M.A. Narváez-Martínez ,&nbsp;Á.M. Henao-Castaño\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfie.2023.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study aims to characterise Postintensive Care Syndrome by classifying the severity of the disease and identifying the variables of influence in two highly complex intensive care units for adults in Colombia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective study was carried out to characterise survivors of critical illness<span> using the Healthy Aging<span> Brain Care –Monitor in a sample of 135 patients. Postintensive Care Syndrome severity was classified using Gaussian Mixture Models for clustering, and the most influencing variables were identified through ordinal logistic regression.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clustering based on Gaussian Mixture Models allowed the classification of Postintensive Care Syndrome severity into mild, moderate, and severe classes, with an Akaike Information Criterion of 308 and an area under the curve<span> of 0.80, which indicates a good fit; Thus, the mild class was characterised by a score on the HABC-M Total scale ≤9; the moderate class for a HABC-M Total score ≥10 and ≤42 and the severe class for a HABC-M Total score ≥43. Regarding the most influencing variables, the probability of belonging to the moderate or severe classes was related to male sex (91%), APACHE II score (22.5%), age (13%), intensive care units days of stay (10.6%), the use of sedation, analgesia<span> and neuromuscular blockers.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intensive care units survivors were characterised using the Healthy Aging Brain Care–Monitor scale, which made it possible to classify Postintensive Care Syndrome through Gaussian Mixture Models clustering into mild, moderate, and severe and to identify variables that had the major influence on the presentation of Postintensive Care Syndrome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria intensiva\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984023000423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984023000423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究旨在通过对哥伦比亚两家高度复杂的成人重症监护病房中重症监护后综合征的严重程度进行分类,并确定其影响变量,从而描述重症监护后综合征的特征。研究方法在 135 名患者样本中使用健康老龄化大脑护理监测器,对重症监护后综合征幸存者的特征进行了描述性、横断面、前瞻性研究。结果 基于高斯混合模型的聚类可将重症监护后综合征的严重程度分为轻度、中度和重度,阿凯克信息标准为 308,曲线下面积为 0.因此,HABC-M 总分≤9 分为轻度;HABC-M 总分≥10 分和≤42 分为中度;HABC-M 总分≥43 分为重度。关于影响最大的变量,属于中度或重度等级的概率与以下因素有关:男性(91%)、APACHE II 评分(22.5%)、年龄(13%)、重症监护室住院天数(10.6%)、镇静、镇痛和神经肌肉阻滞剂的使用。结论使用健康老龄化脑护理监测量表对重症监护室幸存者进行了特征描述,通过高斯混合模型将重症监护后综合征分为轻度、中度和重度,并确定了对重症监护后综合征的表现有重大影响的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Severity classification and influencing variables of the Postintensive Care Syndrome

Objective

The study aims to characterise Postintensive Care Syndrome by classifying the severity of the disease and identifying the variables of influence in two highly complex intensive care units for adults in Colombia.

Methods

A descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective study was carried out to characterise survivors of critical illness using the Healthy Aging Brain Care –Monitor in a sample of 135 patients. Postintensive Care Syndrome severity was classified using Gaussian Mixture Models for clustering, and the most influencing variables were identified through ordinal logistic regression.

Results

Clustering based on Gaussian Mixture Models allowed the classification of Postintensive Care Syndrome severity into mild, moderate, and severe classes, with an Akaike Information Criterion of 308 and an area under the curve of 0.80, which indicates a good fit; Thus, the mild class was characterised by a score on the HABC-M Total scale ≤9; the moderate class for a HABC-M Total score ≥10 and ≤42 and the severe class for a HABC-M Total score ≥43. Regarding the most influencing variables, the probability of belonging to the moderate or severe classes was related to male sex (91%), APACHE II score (22.5%), age (13%), intensive care units days of stay (10.6%), the use of sedation, analgesia and neuromuscular blockers.

Conclusion

Intensive care units survivors were characterised using the Healthy Aging Brain Care–Monitor scale, which made it possible to classify Postintensive Care Syndrome through Gaussian Mixture Models clustering into mild, moderate, and severe and to identify variables that had the major influence on the presentation of Postintensive Care Syndrome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信