超声增强剂与经胸超声心动图对肥厚性心肌病最大壁厚的测定

John P. Bois MD , Chadi Ayoub MBBS, PhD , Jeffrey B. Geske MD , Yee Weng Wong MBBS, MHS , Muhannad A. Abbasi MBBCh , Thomas A. Foley MD , Sharon L. Mulvagh MD , Christopher G. Scott MS , Steve R. Ommen MD , Patricia A. Pellikka MD
{"title":"超声增强剂与经胸超声心动图对肥厚性心肌病最大壁厚的测定","authors":"John P. Bois MD ,&nbsp;Chadi Ayoub MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Geske MD ,&nbsp;Yee Weng Wong MBBS, MHS ,&nbsp;Muhannad A. Abbasi MBBCh ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Foley MD ,&nbsp;Sharon L. Mulvagh MD ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Scott MS ,&nbsp;Steve R. Ommen MD ,&nbsp;Patricia A. Pellikka MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether ultrasound enhancing agent (UEA) changes maximal wall thickness (WT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and if it improves correlation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>A total of 107 patients with HCM were prospectively enrolled at a single tertiary referral center between July 10, 2014, and August 31, 2017, and underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with and without UEA and MRI. Maximal WT measurements were compared, and variability among the 3 modalities was evaluated using a simple linear regression analysis and paired <em>t</em> tests and Bland-Altman plots. Interobserver variability for each technique was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most (63%) of cardiac imagers found UEA helpful in determining maximal WT by TTE, with 49% reporting change in WT. Of 52 patients where UEA changed WT measurement, 32 (62%) reported an increase and 20 (38%) reported a decrease in WT. The UEA did not alter the median discrepancy in WT between MRI and TTE. However, where UEA increased reported WT, the difference between MRI and TTE improved in 79% of cases (<em>P</em>=.001) from 2.0-0.5mm. In those with scar on MRI, UEA improved agreement of WT between TTE and MRI compared with that of TTE without UEA (79% vs 39%; <em>P</em>=.011). Interclass correlation coefficient for WT for TTE without UEA, with UEA, and MRI was 0.84; (95% CI, 0.61-0.92), 0.88; (95%CI, 0.82-0.92), and 0.97; (95%CI, 0.96-0.98), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although use of UEA did not eliminate differences in WT discrepancy between modalities, the addition of UEA to TTE aided in WT determination and improved correlation with MRI in those with greater WT and in all patients with myocardial scars.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/14/main.PMC10371766.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound Enhancing Agents with Transthoracic Echocardiography for Maximal Wall Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy\",\"authors\":\"John P. Bois MD ,&nbsp;Chadi Ayoub MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Geske MD ,&nbsp;Yee Weng Wong MBBS, MHS ,&nbsp;Muhannad A. Abbasi MBBCh ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Foley MD ,&nbsp;Sharon L. Mulvagh MD ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Scott MS ,&nbsp;Steve R. Ommen MD ,&nbsp;Patricia A. Pellikka MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether ultrasound enhancing agent (UEA) changes maximal wall thickness (WT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and if it improves correlation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>A total of 107 patients with HCM were prospectively enrolled at a single tertiary referral center between July 10, 2014, and August 31, 2017, and underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with and without UEA and MRI. Maximal WT measurements were compared, and variability among the 3 modalities was evaluated using a simple linear regression analysis and paired <em>t</em> tests and Bland-Altman plots. Interobserver variability for each technique was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most (63%) of cardiac imagers found UEA helpful in determining maximal WT by TTE, with 49% reporting change in WT. Of 52 patients where UEA changed WT measurement, 32 (62%) reported an increase and 20 (38%) reported a decrease in WT. The UEA did not alter the median discrepancy in WT between MRI and TTE. However, where UEA increased reported WT, the difference between MRI and TTE improved in 79% of cases (<em>P</em>=.001) from 2.0-0.5mm. In those with scar on MRI, UEA improved agreement of WT between TTE and MRI compared with that of TTE without UEA (79% vs 39%; <em>P</em>=.011). Interclass correlation coefficient for WT for TTE without UEA, with UEA, and MRI was 0.84; (95% CI, 0.61-0.92), 0.88; (95%CI, 0.82-0.92), and 0.97; (95%CI, 0.96-0.98), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although use of UEA did not eliminate differences in WT discrepancy between modalities, the addition of UEA to TTE aided in WT determination and improved correlation with MRI in those with greater WT and in all patients with myocardial scars.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/14/main.PMC10371766.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定超声增强剂(UEA)是否能改变肥厚型心肌病(HCM)的最大壁厚(WT),以及是否能改善与磁共振成像(MRI)的相关性。患者和方法在2014年7月10日至2017年8月31日期间,共有107名HCM患者在单一的三级转诊中心前瞻性入选,并接受了经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查,包括UEA和MRI检查。比较了最大WT测量值,并使用简单的线性回归分析、配对t检验和Bland-Altman图评估了3种模式之间的变异性。评估了每种技术的观察者间变异性。结果大多数(63%)的心脏成像仪发现UEA有助于通过TTE确定最大WT,49%的患者报告WT变化。在52名UEA改变WT测量的患者中,32名(62%)报告WT增加,20名(38%)报告WT减少。UEA没有改变MRI和TTE之间WT的中位差异。然而,当UEA增加报告的WT时,79%的病例的MRI和TTE之间的差异从2.0-0.5mm改善(P=0.001)。在MRI上有疤痕的患者中,与没有UEA的TTE相比,UEA改善了TTE和MRI之间的WT一致性(79%对39%;P=0.011)。没有UEA、有UEA和MRI的TTE的WT的类间相关系数为0.84;(95%可信区间,0.61-0.92),0.88;(95%CI,0.82-0.92)和0.97;(95%可信区间,0.96-0.98)。结论尽管UEA的使用并不能消除不同模式之间WT差异的差异,但在TTE中添加UEA有助于WT的确定,并改善了WT较大患者和所有心肌瘢痕患者与MRI的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ultrasound Enhancing Agents with Transthoracic Echocardiography for Maximal Wall Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Ultrasound Enhancing Agents with Transthoracic Echocardiography for Maximal Wall Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Ultrasound Enhancing Agents with Transthoracic Echocardiography for Maximal Wall Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Ultrasound Enhancing Agents with Transthoracic Echocardiography for Maximal Wall Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Objectives

To determine whether ultrasound enhancing agent (UEA) changes maximal wall thickness (WT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and if it improves correlation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Patients and Methods

A total of 107 patients with HCM were prospectively enrolled at a single tertiary referral center between July 10, 2014, and August 31, 2017, and underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with and without UEA and MRI. Maximal WT measurements were compared, and variability among the 3 modalities was evaluated using a simple linear regression analysis and paired t tests and Bland-Altman plots. Interobserver variability for each technique was assessed.

Results

Most (63%) of cardiac imagers found UEA helpful in determining maximal WT by TTE, with 49% reporting change in WT. Of 52 patients where UEA changed WT measurement, 32 (62%) reported an increase and 20 (38%) reported a decrease in WT. The UEA did not alter the median discrepancy in WT between MRI and TTE. However, where UEA increased reported WT, the difference between MRI and TTE improved in 79% of cases (P=.001) from 2.0-0.5mm. In those with scar on MRI, UEA improved agreement of WT between TTE and MRI compared with that of TTE without UEA (79% vs 39%; P=.011). Interclass correlation coefficient for WT for TTE without UEA, with UEA, and MRI was 0.84; (95% CI, 0.61-0.92), 0.88; (95%CI, 0.82-0.92), and 0.97; (95%CI, 0.96-0.98), respectively.

Conclusion

Although use of UEA did not eliminate differences in WT discrepancy between modalities, the addition of UEA to TTE aided in WT determination and improved correlation with MRI in those with greater WT and in all patients with myocardial scars.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信