乳酸浓度大于4mmol /L的感染性休克和低灌注患者推荐30cc /kg液体剂量的评价

Seife Yohannes, Laura Piccolo Serafim, Victoria Slavinsky, Timothy O'Connor, Mathew Cabrera, Meghan K Chin, Alexandra Pratt
{"title":"乳酸浓度大于4mmol /L的感染性休克和低灌注患者推荐30cc /kg液体剂量的评价","authors":"Seife Yohannes,&nbsp;Laura Piccolo Serafim,&nbsp;Victoria Slavinsky,&nbsp;Timothy O'Connor,&nbsp;Mathew Cabrera,&nbsp;Meghan K Chin,&nbsp;Alexandra Pratt","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend fluid administration of 30 cc/kg ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with sepsis and lactate greater than 4 mmol/L within 3 hours of identification. In this study, we explore the impact of fluid dose on lactate normalization, treatment cost, length of stay, and mortality in patients with lactate greater than 4.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight-hospital urban healthcare system in Northeastern United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with sepsis, initial lactate value greater than 4 mmol/L, and received appropriate antibiotics within 3 hours.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We stratified patients into five groups based on the dose of fluid administered within 3 hours after sepsis identification. The groupings were less than 15 cc/kg IBW, 15.1-25 cc/kg IBW, 25.1-35 cc/kg IBW, 35.1-50 cc/kg IBW, and greater than 50 cc/kg IBW. We used the group that received a fluid dose of 25.1-35 cc/kg IBW, as a reference group. The mean age was 66 years, and 56% were male. Three hundred seventy-one (25%) received less than 15 cc/kg of IBW of crystalloid fluid, 278 (17%) received 15-25 cc/kg of IBW, 316 (21%) received 25.1-35 cc/kg of IBW, 319 (21%) received 35.1-50 cc/kg of IBW, and 207 (14%) received greater than 50 cc/kg of IBW. After multilinear regression, there was no significant difference in lactate normalization between the reference group and any of the other fluid groups. We also found no statistically significant difference in the observed/expected cost, or observed/expected length of stay, between the reference group and any of the other fluid groups. Mortality was higher among patients who received greater than 50 cc/kg IBW when compared to the recommended dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with sepsis and lactate value greater than 4 mmol/L, high or low fluid doses were not associated with better lactate clearance or patient outcomes. Greater than 50 cc/kg IBW dose of fluids within 3 hours is associated with higher mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0932"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/b3/cc9-5-e0932.PMC10348724.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Recommended 30 cc/kg Fluid Dose for Patients With Septic Shock and Hypoperfusion With Lactate Greater Than 4 mmol/L.\",\"authors\":\"Seife Yohannes,&nbsp;Laura Piccolo Serafim,&nbsp;Victoria Slavinsky,&nbsp;Timothy O'Connor,&nbsp;Mathew Cabrera,&nbsp;Meghan K Chin,&nbsp;Alexandra Pratt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend fluid administration of 30 cc/kg ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with sepsis and lactate greater than 4 mmol/L within 3 hours of identification. In this study, we explore the impact of fluid dose on lactate normalization, treatment cost, length of stay, and mortality in patients with lactate greater than 4.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight-hospital urban healthcare system in Northeastern United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with sepsis, initial lactate value greater than 4 mmol/L, and received appropriate antibiotics within 3 hours.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We stratified patients into five groups based on the dose of fluid administered within 3 hours after sepsis identification. The groupings were less than 15 cc/kg IBW, 15.1-25 cc/kg IBW, 25.1-35 cc/kg IBW, 35.1-50 cc/kg IBW, and greater than 50 cc/kg IBW. We used the group that received a fluid dose of 25.1-35 cc/kg IBW, as a reference group. The mean age was 66 years, and 56% were male. Three hundred seventy-one (25%) received less than 15 cc/kg of IBW of crystalloid fluid, 278 (17%) received 15-25 cc/kg of IBW, 316 (21%) received 25.1-35 cc/kg of IBW, 319 (21%) received 35.1-50 cc/kg of IBW, and 207 (14%) received greater than 50 cc/kg of IBW. After multilinear regression, there was no significant difference in lactate normalization between the reference group and any of the other fluid groups. We also found no statistically significant difference in the observed/expected cost, or observed/expected length of stay, between the reference group and any of the other fluid groups. Mortality was higher among patients who received greater than 50 cc/kg IBW when compared to the recommended dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with sepsis and lactate value greater than 4 mmol/L, high or low fluid doses were not associated with better lactate clearance or patient outcomes. Greater than 50 cc/kg IBW dose of fluids within 3 hours is associated with higher mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 7\",\"pages\":\"e0932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/b3/cc9-5-e0932.PMC10348724.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生存脓毒症运动指南推荐对脓毒症患者进行30cc /kg理想体重(IBW)的液体治疗,并且在确诊的3小时内乳酸浓度大于4mmol /L。在本研究中,我们探讨液体剂量对乳酸浓度大于4的患者的乳酸正常化、治疗费用、住院时间和死亡率的影响。设计:多中心回顾性观察研究。背景:美国东北部八所医院的城市医疗保健系统。患者:脓毒症患者,初始乳酸值大于4 mmol/L,并在3小时内接受合适的抗生素治疗。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:我们根据脓毒症确诊后3小时内给予的液体剂量将患者分为五组。分组分别为小于15 cc/kg IBW、15.1 ~ 25 cc/kg IBW、25.1 ~ 35 cc/kg IBW、35.1 ~ 50 cc/kg IBW和大于50 cc/kg IBW。我们以接受25.1-35 cc/kg IBW液体剂量组作为参照组。平均年龄为66岁,56%为男性。371个(25%)的结晶液低于15立方厘米/千克,278个(17%)的结晶液为15-25立方厘米/千克,316个(21%)的结晶液为25.1-35立方厘米/千克,319个(21%)的结晶液为35.1-50立方厘米/千克,207个(14%)结晶液大于50立方厘米/千克。经多元线性回归,对照组与其他任何液体组之间的乳酸正常化无显著差异。我们还发现,在观察/预期成本,或观察/预期住院时间方面,参考组与任何其他液体组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。与推荐剂量相比,接受大于50cc /kg IBW的患者死亡率更高。结论:在乳酸值大于4 mmol/L的脓毒症患者中,高或低液体剂量与更好的乳酸清除率或患者预后无关。3小时内液体剂量大于50cc /kg IBW与较高的死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of the Recommended 30 cc/kg Fluid Dose for Patients With Septic Shock and Hypoperfusion With Lactate Greater Than 4 mmol/L.

Evaluation of the Recommended 30 cc/kg Fluid Dose for Patients With Septic Shock and Hypoperfusion With Lactate Greater Than 4 mmol/L.

Evaluation of the Recommended 30 cc/kg Fluid Dose for Patients With Septic Shock and Hypoperfusion With Lactate Greater Than 4 mmol/L.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend fluid administration of 30 cc/kg ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with sepsis and lactate greater than 4 mmol/L within 3 hours of identification. In this study, we explore the impact of fluid dose on lactate normalization, treatment cost, length of stay, and mortality in patients with lactate greater than 4.

Design: Multicenter retrospective observational study.

Setting: Eight-hospital urban healthcare system in Northeastern United States.

Patients: Patients with sepsis, initial lactate value greater than 4 mmol/L, and received appropriate antibiotics within 3 hours.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We stratified patients into five groups based on the dose of fluid administered within 3 hours after sepsis identification. The groupings were less than 15 cc/kg IBW, 15.1-25 cc/kg IBW, 25.1-35 cc/kg IBW, 35.1-50 cc/kg IBW, and greater than 50 cc/kg IBW. We used the group that received a fluid dose of 25.1-35 cc/kg IBW, as a reference group. The mean age was 66 years, and 56% were male. Three hundred seventy-one (25%) received less than 15 cc/kg of IBW of crystalloid fluid, 278 (17%) received 15-25 cc/kg of IBW, 316 (21%) received 25.1-35 cc/kg of IBW, 319 (21%) received 35.1-50 cc/kg of IBW, and 207 (14%) received greater than 50 cc/kg of IBW. After multilinear regression, there was no significant difference in lactate normalization between the reference group and any of the other fluid groups. We also found no statistically significant difference in the observed/expected cost, or observed/expected length of stay, between the reference group and any of the other fluid groups. Mortality was higher among patients who received greater than 50 cc/kg IBW when compared to the recommended dose.

Conclusions: In patients with sepsis and lactate value greater than 4 mmol/L, high or low fluid doses were not associated with better lactate clearance or patient outcomes. Greater than 50 cc/kg IBW dose of fluids within 3 hours is associated with higher mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信