利用纳米转矩旋转椅进行正弦谐波加速度试验和速度阶跃试验的老化效应和重测可靠性

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Nourhan Ghoraba, Samir Assal, Doaa Elmoazen
{"title":"利用纳米转矩旋转椅进行正弦谐波加速度试验和速度阶跃试验的老化效应和重测可靠性","authors":"Nourhan Ghoraba,&nbsp;Samir Assal,&nbsp;Doaa Elmoazen","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Rotatory chair testing has been used to evaluate horizontal canal function. Frequently used tests include sinusoidal harmonic acceleration test (SHAT) and velocity step test (VST).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assessment of age effect on the SHAT and VST and assessment of test-retest reliability of the parameters of those two tests.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was performed on 100 subjects with no ear or vestibular complaints and normal vestibular evaluation. They were divided into two groups<strong>;</strong> Group A: below 50 years of age and Group B: 50 years of age or above. SHAT was presented at frequencies 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32, 0.64 Hz with a peak velocity of 60°/s. VST was performed using a maximum velocity of 100°/s with acceleration and deceleration of 200°/s<sup>2.</sup> Thirty subjects were tested twice to assess reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participants ranged in age from 20 to 67 years. Regarding group A, the mean age was 30.92 ± 7.31 and 55.36 ± 4.61 for group B. No significant differences were found in SHAT parameters between the two groups. As well, there was no significant difference in VST per-rotatory time constant, however, post-rotatory time constant was significantly longer for Group B (P value &lt; 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values showed moderate to good reliability (ICC 0.580–0.818) for SHAT parameters for the lower frequencies and indicated moderate reliability for VST time constant (ICC 0.509–0.652).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Age has no significant effect on the parameters of SHAT and VST. Test-retest reliability is generally good for both tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aging effect and test-retest reliability of the sinusoidal harmonic acceleration test and velocity step test using nanotorque rotatory chair\",\"authors\":\"Nourhan Ghoraba,&nbsp;Samir Assal,&nbsp;Doaa Elmoazen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joto.2023.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Rotatory chair testing has been used to evaluate horizontal canal function. Frequently used tests include sinusoidal harmonic acceleration test (SHAT) and velocity step test (VST).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assessment of age effect on the SHAT and VST and assessment of test-retest reliability of the parameters of those two tests.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was performed on 100 subjects with no ear or vestibular complaints and normal vestibular evaluation. They were divided into two groups<strong>;</strong> Group A: below 50 years of age and Group B: 50 years of age or above. SHAT was presented at frequencies 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32, 0.64 Hz with a peak velocity of 60°/s. VST was performed using a maximum velocity of 100°/s with acceleration and deceleration of 200°/s<sup>2.</sup> Thirty subjects were tested twice to assess reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participants ranged in age from 20 to 67 years. Regarding group A, the mean age was 30.92 ± 7.31 and 55.36 ± 4.61 for group B. No significant differences were found in SHAT parameters between the two groups. As well, there was no significant difference in VST per-rotatory time constant, however, post-rotatory time constant was significantly longer for Group B (P value &lt; 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values showed moderate to good reliability (ICC 0.580–0.818) for SHAT parameters for the lower frequencies and indicated moderate reliability for VST time constant (ICC 0.509–0.652).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Age has no significant effect on the parameters of SHAT and VST. Test-retest reliability is generally good for both tests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10366574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293023000284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293023000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言旋转椅测试已用于评估水平管功能。常用的测试包括正弦谐波加速度测试(SHAT)和速度阶跃测试(VST)。目的评估年龄对SHAT和VST的影响,并评估这两种测试参数的重测可靠性。方法对100例无耳前庭主诉、前庭功能正常的受试者进行前瞻性研究。他们被分成两组;A组50岁以下,B组50岁以上。SHAT出现在频率0.02、0.04、0.08、0.16、0.32、0.64 Hz,峰值速度为60°/s。VST的最大速度为100°/s,加速度和减速度为200°/s2。30名受试者接受了两次测试以评估可靠性。结果研究对象年龄在20至67岁之间。A组的平均年龄为30.92±7.31,B组为55.36±4.61。两组的SHAT参数没有显著差异。每个旋转时间常数的VST也没有显著差异,B组的旋转后时间常数明显较长(P值<;0.05)。组内相关系数(ICC)值对较低频率的SHAT参数显示中度至良好的可靠性(ICC 0.580–0.818),对VST时间常数显示中度可靠性(ICC 0.509–0.652)。测试-重新测试的可靠性通常对两种测试都很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Aging effect and test-retest reliability of the sinusoidal harmonic acceleration test and velocity step test using nanotorque rotatory chair

Aging effect and test-retest reliability of the sinusoidal harmonic acceleration test and velocity step test using nanotorque rotatory chair

Introduction

Rotatory chair testing has been used to evaluate horizontal canal function. Frequently used tests include sinusoidal harmonic acceleration test (SHAT) and velocity step test (VST).

Objectives

Assessment of age effect on the SHAT and VST and assessment of test-retest reliability of the parameters of those two tests.

Methods

A prospective study was performed on 100 subjects with no ear or vestibular complaints and normal vestibular evaluation. They were divided into two groups; Group A: below 50 years of age and Group B: 50 years of age or above. SHAT was presented at frequencies 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32, 0.64 Hz with a peak velocity of 60°/s. VST was performed using a maximum velocity of 100°/s with acceleration and deceleration of 200°/s2. Thirty subjects were tested twice to assess reliability.

Results

Study participants ranged in age from 20 to 67 years. Regarding group A, the mean age was 30.92 ± 7.31 and 55.36 ± 4.61 for group B. No significant differences were found in SHAT parameters between the two groups. As well, there was no significant difference in VST per-rotatory time constant, however, post-rotatory time constant was significantly longer for Group B (P value < 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values showed moderate to good reliability (ICC 0.580–0.818) for SHAT parameters for the lower frequencies and indicated moderate reliability for VST time constant (ICC 0.509–0.652).

Conclusions

Age has no significant effect on the parameters of SHAT and VST. Test-retest reliability is generally good for both tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信