循环肿瘤细胞与血清癌胚抗原联合检测对结直肠癌患者预后的增强价值。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chih-Yung Yang, Chun-Chi Lin, Sheng-Chieh Huang, Ruey-Hwa Lu, Liang-Chuan Lo, Ju-Yu Tseng, Chien-Yi Tung, Chi-Hung Lin, Jeng-Kai Jiang
{"title":"循环肿瘤细胞与血清癌胚抗原联合检测对结直肠癌患者预后的增强价值。","authors":"Chih-Yung Yang,&nbsp;Chun-Chi Lin,&nbsp;Sheng-Chieh Huang,&nbsp;Ruey-Hwa Lu,&nbsp;Liang-Chuan Lo,&nbsp;Ju-Yu Tseng,&nbsp;Chien-Yi Tung,&nbsp;Chi-Hung Lin,&nbsp;Jeng-Kai Jiang","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been investigated as a potential biomarker for predicting prognosis and monitoring therapeutic responses in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the sensitivity of CTCs detection is low, thus limiting the clinical utility of CTCs. We aim to examine the clinicopathological parameters that improve prognosis prediction for CRC using CTCs as a biomarker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enumerated CTCs in 186 CRC patients and associated the number of CTCs with the clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) using a univariate and multivariate Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of CTCs from 186 CRC patients was significantly associated with stage, preoperational carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and CA19-9 levels. Using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis, patients with five or more CTCs exhibited significantly worse OS compared to patients with fewer than five CTCs. The combination of CTCs with tumor marker CEA has a better OS prediction than individual CTCs or CEA and serves as a more effective prediction model in patients with CRC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified that patients with more than five CTCs exhibited significantly worse OS. Additionally, patients with the normal level of CEA, but who also had more than five CTCs trended towards a worse OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","volume":"86 5","pages":"465-471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced prognostic value of combined circulating tumor cells and serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Yung Yang,&nbsp;Chun-Chi Lin,&nbsp;Sheng-Chieh Huang,&nbsp;Ruey-Hwa Lu,&nbsp;Liang-Chuan Lo,&nbsp;Ju-Yu Tseng,&nbsp;Chien-Yi Tung,&nbsp;Chi-Hung Lin,&nbsp;Jeng-Kai Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been investigated as a potential biomarker for predicting prognosis and monitoring therapeutic responses in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the sensitivity of CTCs detection is low, thus limiting the clinical utility of CTCs. We aim to examine the clinicopathological parameters that improve prognosis prediction for CRC using CTCs as a biomarker.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enumerated CTCs in 186 CRC patients and associated the number of CTCs with the clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) using a univariate and multivariate Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of CTCs from 186 CRC patients was significantly associated with stage, preoperational carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and CA19-9 levels. Using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis, patients with five or more CTCs exhibited significantly worse OS compared to patients with fewer than five CTCs. The combination of CTCs with tumor marker CEA has a better OS prediction than individual CTCs or CEA and serves as a more effective prediction model in patients with CRC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified that patients with more than five CTCs exhibited significantly worse OS. Additionally, patients with the normal level of CEA, but who also had more than five CTCs trended towards a worse OS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"86 5\",\"pages\":\"465-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000906\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)已被研究作为预测结直肠癌(CRC)预后和监测治疗反应的潜在生物标志物。然而,ctc检测的灵敏度较低,限制了ctc的临床应用。我们的目的是研究使用ctc作为生物标志物改善CRC预后预测的临床病理参数。方法:采用单因素和多因素Cox回归模型及Kaplan-Meier生存分析,对186例结直肠癌患者的CTCs进行计数,并将CTCs数量与临床病理特征和总生存期(OS)相关联。结果:186例结直肠癌患者ctc的存在与分期、术前癌胚抗原(CEA)和CA19-9水平显著相关。使用Kaplan-Meier生存和Cox回归分析,与少于5个CTCs的患者相比,5个或更多CTCs的患者表现出明显更差的OS。ctc联合肿瘤标志物CEA比单独ctc或CEA具有更好的OS预测效果,是一种更有效的预测结直肠癌患者预后的模型。结论:我们确定超过5个ctc的患者表现出明显更差的OS。此外,CEA水平正常但ctc超过5个的患者的OS更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced prognostic value of combined circulating tumor cells and serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with colorectal cancer.

Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been investigated as a potential biomarker for predicting prognosis and monitoring therapeutic responses in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the sensitivity of CTCs detection is low, thus limiting the clinical utility of CTCs. We aim to examine the clinicopathological parameters that improve prognosis prediction for CRC using CTCs as a biomarker.

Methods: We enumerated CTCs in 186 CRC patients and associated the number of CTCs with the clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) using a univariate and multivariate Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: The presence of CTCs from 186 CRC patients was significantly associated with stage, preoperational carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and CA19-9 levels. Using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analysis, patients with five or more CTCs exhibited significantly worse OS compared to patients with fewer than five CTCs. The combination of CTCs with tumor marker CEA has a better OS prediction than individual CTCs or CEA and serves as a more effective prediction model in patients with CRC.

Conclusion: We identified that patients with more than five CTCs exhibited significantly worse OS. Additionally, patients with the normal level of CEA, but who also had more than five CTCs trended towards a worse OS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
15.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, previously known as the Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), has a long history of publishing scientific papers and has continuously made substantial contribution in the understanding and progress of a broad range of biomedical sciences. It is published monthly by Wolters Kluwer Health and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), MEDLINE®, Index Medicus, EMBASE, CAB Abstracts, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica (SIIC) Data Bases, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Global Health. JCMA is the official and open access journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and is an international forum for scholarly reports in medicine, surgery, dentistry and basic research in biomedical science. As a vehicle of communication and education among physicians and scientists, the journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Reports of professional practice will need to demonstrate academic robustness and scientific rigor. Outstanding scholars are invited to give their update reviews on the perspectives of the evidence-based science in the related research field. Article types accepted include review articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications and letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信