病人安全4.0:“一周的失败”这都是关于角色塑造的!]

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Francis Ulmer, Rabea Krings, Christoph Häberli, Romina Bally, Marcus Schuchmann, Sören Huwendiek, Hans-Joachim Kabitz
{"title":"病人安全4.0:“一周的失败”这都是关于角色塑造的!]","authors":"Francis Ulmer,&nbsp;Rabea Krings,&nbsp;Christoph Häberli,&nbsp;Romina Bally,&nbsp;Marcus Schuchmann,&nbsp;Sören Huwendiek,&nbsp;Hans-Joachim Kabitz","doi":"10.1055/a-2061-1554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rate of mistakes and near misses in clinical medicine remains staggering. The tendency to cover up mistakes is rampant in \"name-blame-shame\" cultures. The need for safe forums where mistakes can be openly discussed in the interest of patient safety is evident. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, a semi-structured weekly conference, named \"mistake of the week\" (MOTW), was introduced, enabling physicians to voluntarily discuss their mistakes and near-misses. The MOTW is intended to encourage cultural change in how physicians approach, process, accept and learn from their own and their peers' mistakes. This study seeks to assess if physicians appreciate, benefit from and are motivated to participate in MOTW.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Physicians and medical students of the I. and II. <i>Medizinische Klinik</i> at the Academic Teaching Hospital Klinikum Konstanz (Germany) were eligible to participate voluntarily. Four groups of physicians (n=3-6) and one group of medical students (n=5) volunteered to participate in focus group interviews, which were videotaped, transcribed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following success factors are crucial for dealing with and voluntarily disclosing mistakes and near-misses: 1. Exemplification (\"follow the boss's lead\"), 2. Fixed time slots and a clear forum, 3. Reporting mistakes without fear of penalty or punishment, 4. A trusting working atmosphere. The key effects of the MOTW approach are: 1. People report their mistakes more, 2. Relief, 3. Psychological safety, 4. Lessons learned/errors (potentially) reduced.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The MOTW conference models an ideal forum to mitigate hierarchy and promote a sustainable organizational dynamic in which mistakes and near misses can be discussed in an environment free from \"name-blame-shame\", with the ultimate goal of potentially improving patient care and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11370,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift","volume":"148 15","pages":"e87-e97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/1f/10-1055-a-2061-1554.PMC10361823.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Patient safety 4.0: \\\"Failure of the Week\\\" It's all about role modelling!]\",\"authors\":\"Francis Ulmer,&nbsp;Rabea Krings,&nbsp;Christoph Häberli,&nbsp;Romina Bally,&nbsp;Marcus Schuchmann,&nbsp;Sören Huwendiek,&nbsp;Hans-Joachim Kabitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2061-1554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rate of mistakes and near misses in clinical medicine remains staggering. The tendency to cover up mistakes is rampant in \\\"name-blame-shame\\\" cultures. The need for safe forums where mistakes can be openly discussed in the interest of patient safety is evident. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, a semi-structured weekly conference, named \\\"mistake of the week\\\" (MOTW), was introduced, enabling physicians to voluntarily discuss their mistakes and near-misses. The MOTW is intended to encourage cultural change in how physicians approach, process, accept and learn from their own and their peers' mistakes. This study seeks to assess if physicians appreciate, benefit from and are motivated to participate in MOTW.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Physicians and medical students of the I. and II. <i>Medizinische Klinik</i> at the Academic Teaching Hospital Klinikum Konstanz (Germany) were eligible to participate voluntarily. Four groups of physicians (n=3-6) and one group of medical students (n=5) volunteered to participate in focus group interviews, which were videotaped, transcribed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following success factors are crucial for dealing with and voluntarily disclosing mistakes and near-misses: 1. Exemplification (\\\"follow the boss's lead\\\"), 2. Fixed time slots and a clear forum, 3. Reporting mistakes without fear of penalty or punishment, 4. A trusting working atmosphere. The key effects of the MOTW approach are: 1. People report their mistakes more, 2. Relief, 3. Psychological safety, 4. Lessons learned/errors (potentially) reduced.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The MOTW conference models an ideal forum to mitigate hierarchy and promote a sustainable organizational dynamic in which mistakes and near misses can be discussed in an environment free from \\\"name-blame-shame\\\", with the ultimate goal of potentially improving patient care and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":\"148 15\",\"pages\":\"e87-e97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/1f/10-1055-a-2061-1554.PMC10361823.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2061-1554\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2061-1554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床医学的错误率和漏诊率仍然惊人。掩盖错误的倾向在“名-责-耻”文化中十分猖獗。显然,为了患者的安全,需要有一个安全的论坛,在那里可以公开讨论错误。在对文献进行全面回顾之后,引入了一个半结构化的每周会议,名为“每周错误”(MOTW),使医生能够自愿讨论他们的错误和险些失误。mow旨在鼓励医生如何处理、接受和从自己和同行的错误中学习的文化变革。本研究旨在评估医生是否欣赏、从中受益并有动力参与护理。方法:内科医生和医学生的一、二。Klinikum Konstanz学术教学医院(德国)的Medizinische Klinik有资格自愿参加。四组医生(n=3-6)和一组医学生(n=5)自愿参加焦点小组访谈,对访谈进行录像、转录和分析。结果:成功处理和主动披露错误和未遂事件的关键因素如下:范例化(“跟随老板的领导”);2 .固定的时间段和清晰的论坛;3 .敢于报告错误,不怕受到惩罚;信任的工作氛围。mow方法的主要效果是:1。人们报告错误的次数更多。缓解,3。4.心理安全;(潜在地)减少了经验教训/错误。讨论:MOTW会议模拟了一个理想的论坛,以减轻等级制度,促进可持续的组织动态,在这个论坛中,错误和未遂事件可以在一个没有“点名指责羞耻”的环境中讨论,最终目标是潜在地改善病人的护理和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[Patient safety 4.0: "Failure of the Week" It's all about role modelling!]

[Patient safety 4.0: "Failure of the Week" It's all about role modelling!]

[Patient safety 4.0: "Failure of the Week" It's all about role modelling!]

Background: The rate of mistakes and near misses in clinical medicine remains staggering. The tendency to cover up mistakes is rampant in "name-blame-shame" cultures. The need for safe forums where mistakes can be openly discussed in the interest of patient safety is evident. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, a semi-structured weekly conference, named "mistake of the week" (MOTW), was introduced, enabling physicians to voluntarily discuss their mistakes and near-misses. The MOTW is intended to encourage cultural change in how physicians approach, process, accept and learn from their own and their peers' mistakes. This study seeks to assess if physicians appreciate, benefit from and are motivated to participate in MOTW.

Methods: Physicians and medical students of the I. and II. Medizinische Klinik at the Academic Teaching Hospital Klinikum Konstanz (Germany) were eligible to participate voluntarily. Four groups of physicians (n=3-6) and one group of medical students (n=5) volunteered to participate in focus group interviews, which were videotaped, transcribed and analyzed.

Results: The following success factors are crucial for dealing with and voluntarily disclosing mistakes and near-misses: 1. Exemplification ("follow the boss's lead"), 2. Fixed time slots and a clear forum, 3. Reporting mistakes without fear of penalty or punishment, 4. A trusting working atmosphere. The key effects of the MOTW approach are: 1. People report their mistakes more, 2. Relief, 3. Psychological safety, 4. Lessons learned/errors (potentially) reduced.

Discussion: The MOTW conference models an ideal forum to mitigate hierarchy and promote a sustainable organizational dynamic in which mistakes and near misses can be discussed in an environment free from "name-blame-shame", with the ultimate goal of potentially improving patient care and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift
Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
432
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ein Schwerpunktthema - verschiedene Perspektiven Mit vielen praktischen Tipps und konkreten Handlungsanweisungen. Kurz und prägnant: Aktuell informiert Interessante Nachrichten für Sie zusammengefasst und von Experten kommentiert. Fundiertes Fachwissen - für Einsteiger und Profis Ein bunter Mix aus Übersichten, Fallbeispielen, Kasuistiken und Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitungen. Blick über den Tellerrand Erweitern Sie Ihren Fokus über das reine Fachwissen hinaus mit "Medizin im Kontext".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信