准实验,非随机倡议减少住院儿童睡眠中断。

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Brianna Glover, Leonid Bederman, Evan Orenstein, Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Anthony Cooley, Christy Bryant, Sarah Thompson, Sindhu Thomas, Sarah Graham, Selena Yamasaki, Michelle Thornton, Linda Perry, Nicole Hames
{"title":"准实验,非随机倡议减少住院儿童睡眠中断。","authors":"Brianna Glover,&nbsp;Leonid Bederman,&nbsp;Evan Orenstein,&nbsp;Swaminathan Kandaswamy,&nbsp;Anthony Cooley,&nbsp;Christy Bryant,&nbsp;Sarah Thompson,&nbsp;Sindhu Thomas,&nbsp;Sarah Graham,&nbsp;Selena Yamasaki,&nbsp;Michelle Thornton,&nbsp;Linda Perry,&nbsp;Nicole Hames","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospitalized children experience frequent sleep disruptions. We aimed to reduce caregiver-reported sleep disruptions of children hospitalized on the pediatric hospital medicine service by 10% over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In family surveys, caregivers cited overnight vital signs (VS) as a primary contributor to sleep disruption. We created a new VS frequency order of \"every 4 hours (unless asleep between 2300 and 0500)\" as well as a patient list column in the electronic health record indicating patients with this active VS order. The outcome measure was caregiver-reported sleep disruptions. The process measure was adherence to the new VS frequency. The balancing measure was rapid responses called on patients with the new VS frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physician teams ordered the new VS frequency for 11% (1,633/14,772) of patient nights on the pediatric hospital medicine service. Recorded VS between 2300 and 0500 was 89% (1,447/1,633) of patient nights with the new frequency ordered compared to 91% (11,895/13,139) of patient nights without the new frequency ordered (<i>P</i> = 0.01). By contrast, recorded blood pressure between 2300 and 0500 was only 36% (588/1,633) of patient nights with the new frequency but 87% (11,478/13,139) of patient nights without the new frequency (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Overall, caregivers reported sleep disruptions on 24% (99/419) of reported nights preintervention, which decreased to 8% (195/2,313) postintervention (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Importantly, there were no adverse safety issues related to this initiative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study safely implemented a new VS frequency with reduced overnight blood pressure readings and caregiver-reported sleep disruptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/a5/pqs-8-e666.PMC10332835.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quasi-experimental, Nonrandomized Initiative to Minimize Sleep Disruptions among Hospitalized Children.\",\"authors\":\"Brianna Glover,&nbsp;Leonid Bederman,&nbsp;Evan Orenstein,&nbsp;Swaminathan Kandaswamy,&nbsp;Anthony Cooley,&nbsp;Christy Bryant,&nbsp;Sarah Thompson,&nbsp;Sindhu Thomas,&nbsp;Sarah Graham,&nbsp;Selena Yamasaki,&nbsp;Michelle Thornton,&nbsp;Linda Perry,&nbsp;Nicole Hames\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hospitalized children experience frequent sleep disruptions. We aimed to reduce caregiver-reported sleep disruptions of children hospitalized on the pediatric hospital medicine service by 10% over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In family surveys, caregivers cited overnight vital signs (VS) as a primary contributor to sleep disruption. We created a new VS frequency order of \\\"every 4 hours (unless asleep between 2300 and 0500)\\\" as well as a patient list column in the electronic health record indicating patients with this active VS order. The outcome measure was caregiver-reported sleep disruptions. The process measure was adherence to the new VS frequency. The balancing measure was rapid responses called on patients with the new VS frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physician teams ordered the new VS frequency for 11% (1,633/14,772) of patient nights on the pediatric hospital medicine service. Recorded VS between 2300 and 0500 was 89% (1,447/1,633) of patient nights with the new frequency ordered compared to 91% (11,895/13,139) of patient nights without the new frequency ordered (<i>P</i> = 0.01). By contrast, recorded blood pressure between 2300 and 0500 was only 36% (588/1,633) of patient nights with the new frequency but 87% (11,478/13,139) of patient nights without the new frequency (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Overall, caregivers reported sleep disruptions on 24% (99/419) of reported nights preintervention, which decreased to 8% (195/2,313) postintervention (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Importantly, there were no adverse safety issues related to this initiative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study safely implemented a new VS frequency with reduced overnight blood pressure readings and caregiver-reported sleep disruptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/a5/pqs-8-e666.PMC10332835.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住院儿童经常经历睡眠中断。我们的目标是在12个月内将儿科医院医学服务住院的儿童的护理人员报告的睡眠中断减少10%。方法:在家庭调查中,护理人员将夜间生命体征(VS)列为导致睡眠中断的主要因素。我们创建了一个新的VS频率顺序“每4小时一次(除非在2300点到0500点之间睡觉)”,并在电子健康记录中创建了一个患者列表列,显示具有此活跃VS顺序的患者。结果测量是看护者报告的睡眠中断。过程测量是遵守新的VS频率。平衡措施是对新VS频率患者的快速反应。结果:儿科医院医学服务的11%(1,633/14,772)患者使用了新的VS频率。2300至0500之间记录的VS为89%(1,447/1,633)的患者夜,而未订购新频率的患者夜为91% (11,895/13,139)(P = 0.01)。相比之下,2300 - 0500之间记录的血压在新频率下仅占36%(588/ 1633),而在没有新频率的情况下占87% (11478 / 13139)(P < 0.001)。总体而言,护理人员在干预前报告的夜间睡眠中断率为24%(99/419),干预后降至8% (195/ 2313)(P < 0.001)。重要的是,没有与此计划相关的不利安全问题。结论:这项研究安全地实施了新的VS频率,降低了夜间血压读数和护理人员报告的睡眠中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quasi-experimental, Nonrandomized Initiative to Minimize Sleep Disruptions among Hospitalized Children.

Quasi-experimental, Nonrandomized Initiative to Minimize Sleep Disruptions among Hospitalized Children.

Quasi-experimental, Nonrandomized Initiative to Minimize Sleep Disruptions among Hospitalized Children.

Quasi-experimental, Nonrandomized Initiative to Minimize Sleep Disruptions among Hospitalized Children.

Hospitalized children experience frequent sleep disruptions. We aimed to reduce caregiver-reported sleep disruptions of children hospitalized on the pediatric hospital medicine service by 10% over 12 months.

Methods: In family surveys, caregivers cited overnight vital signs (VS) as a primary contributor to sleep disruption. We created a new VS frequency order of "every 4 hours (unless asleep between 2300 and 0500)" as well as a patient list column in the electronic health record indicating patients with this active VS order. The outcome measure was caregiver-reported sleep disruptions. The process measure was adherence to the new VS frequency. The balancing measure was rapid responses called on patients with the new VS frequency.

Results: Physician teams ordered the new VS frequency for 11% (1,633/14,772) of patient nights on the pediatric hospital medicine service. Recorded VS between 2300 and 0500 was 89% (1,447/1,633) of patient nights with the new frequency ordered compared to 91% (11,895/13,139) of patient nights without the new frequency ordered (P = 0.01). By contrast, recorded blood pressure between 2300 and 0500 was only 36% (588/1,633) of patient nights with the new frequency but 87% (11,478/13,139) of patient nights without the new frequency (P < 0.001). Overall, caregivers reported sleep disruptions on 24% (99/419) of reported nights preintervention, which decreased to 8% (195/2,313) postintervention (P < 0.001). Importantly, there were no adverse safety issues related to this initiative.

Conclusion: This study safely implemented a new VS frequency with reduced overnight blood pressure readings and caregiver-reported sleep disruptions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信