在心房颤动的导管消融中比较苯丙酮与直接口服抗凝剂。

European Heart Journal Open Pub Date : 2023-06-20 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oead065
Diona Gjermeni, Nertila Poci Saglam, Christoph B Olivier, Volker Kühlkamp
{"title":"在心房颤动的导管消融中比较苯丙酮与直接口服抗凝剂。","authors":"Diona Gjermeni, Nertila Poci Saglam, Christoph B Olivier, Volker Kühlkamp","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective and safe as the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin. Phenprocoumon has a different pharmacokinetic profile compared with warfarin and is the most used VKA in Germany. The aim of the study was to compare DOAC with phenprocoumon.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, 1735 patients who underwent 2219 consecutive catheter ablations for AF between January 2011 and May 2017 were included. All patients were in-hospital for at least 48 h after catheter ablation. The primary outcome was defined as peri-procedural thrombo-embolic events. The secondary outcome was any bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). The mean age of the patients was 63.3 years. Phenprocoumon was prescribed in 929 (42%) of the cases, and in 697 (31%) dabigatran, 399 (18%) rivaroxaban, and 194 (9%) apixaban. During hospitalization, 37 (1.6%) thrombo-embolic events occurred, including 23 transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs). Compared with the use of phenoprocoumon, the use of DOAC was significantly associated with a lower thrombo-embolic risk [16 (1.2%) vs. 21 (2.2%), odds ratio (OR)], 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.9], <i>P</i> = 0.04. No statistically significant association with bleeding risk was observed [phenprocomoun: 122 (13%); DOAC: 163 (12.6%); OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2); <i>P</i> = 0.70]. Interruption of oral anticoagulation (OAC) was associated with an increased risk for thrombo-embolic complications [OR 2.2 (1.1-4.3); <i>P</i> = 0.031], and bleeding [OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.8-3.2), <i>P</i> = 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, the use of DOAC was associated with a reduced risk of thrombo-embolic events compared with phenprocoumon. Non-interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy was associated with a reduced risk of peri-procedural thrombo-embolic and any bleeding complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11973,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/89/oead065.PMC10329261.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of phenprocoumon with direct oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Diona Gjermeni, Nertila Poci Saglam, Christoph B Olivier, Volker Kühlkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oead065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective and safe as the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin. Phenprocoumon has a different pharmacokinetic profile compared with warfarin and is the most used VKA in Germany. The aim of the study was to compare DOAC with phenprocoumon.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, 1735 patients who underwent 2219 consecutive catheter ablations for AF between January 2011 and May 2017 were included. All patients were in-hospital for at least 48 h after catheter ablation. The primary outcome was defined as peri-procedural thrombo-embolic events. The secondary outcome was any bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). The mean age of the patients was 63.3 years. Phenprocoumon was prescribed in 929 (42%) of the cases, and in 697 (31%) dabigatran, 399 (18%) rivaroxaban, and 194 (9%) apixaban. During hospitalization, 37 (1.6%) thrombo-embolic events occurred, including 23 transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs). Compared with the use of phenoprocoumon, the use of DOAC was significantly associated with a lower thrombo-embolic risk [16 (1.2%) vs. 21 (2.2%), odds ratio (OR)], 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.9], <i>P</i> = 0.04. No statistically significant association with bleeding risk was observed [phenprocomoun: 122 (13%); DOAC: 163 (12.6%); OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2); <i>P</i> = 0.70]. Interruption of oral anticoagulation (OAC) was associated with an increased risk for thrombo-embolic complications [OR 2.2 (1.1-4.3); <i>P</i> = 0.031], and bleeding [OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.8-3.2), <i>P</i> = 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, the use of DOAC was associated with a reduced risk of thrombo-embolic events compared with phenprocoumon. Non-interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy was associated with a reduced risk of peri-procedural thrombo-embolic and any bleeding complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/89/oead065.PMC10329261.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在接受心房颤动(房颤)导管消融术的患者中,直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)华法林一样有效、安全。苯丙酮与华法林的药代动力学特征不同,是德国使用最多的 VKA。该研究的目的是比较 DOAC 与苯丙酮:在这项回顾性单中心队列研究中,纳入了 2011 年 1 月至 2017 年 5 月间因房颤接受过 2219 次连续导管消融术的 1735 名患者。所有患者在导管消融术后至少住院 48 小时。主要结果定义为术前血栓栓塞事件。根据国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)的规定,次要结果为任何出血。患者的平均年龄为 63.3 岁。929例(42%)患者服用了苯丙酮,697例(31%)患者服用了达比加群,399例(18%)患者服用了利伐沙班,194例(9%)患者服用了阿哌沙班。住院期间发生了 37 起(1.6%)血栓栓塞事件,其中包括 23 起短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)。与使用苯丙酮相比,使用 DOAC 与较低的血栓栓塞风险显著相关 [16 (1.2%) vs. 21 (2.2%),比值比 (OR)], 0.5 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.2-0.9],P = 0.04。未观察到与出血风险有统计学意义的关联[苯丙酮:122 (13%);DOAC:163 (12.6%);OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2);P = 0.70]。中断口服抗凝药(OAC)与血栓栓塞并发症[OR 2.2 (1.1-4.3); P = 0.031]和出血[OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.8-3.2), P = 0.001]风险增加有关:结论:在接受房颤导管消融术的患者中,与苯丙酮相比,使用 DOAC 可降低血栓栓塞事件的风险。不间断口服抗凝药(OAC)治疗可降低手术周围血栓栓塞和任何出血并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of phenprocoumon with direct oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Comparison of phenprocoumon with direct oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Comparison of phenprocoumon with direct oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Comparison of phenprocoumon with direct oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Aims: In patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective and safe as the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin. Phenprocoumon has a different pharmacokinetic profile compared with warfarin and is the most used VKA in Germany. The aim of the study was to compare DOAC with phenprocoumon.

Methods and results: In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, 1735 patients who underwent 2219 consecutive catheter ablations for AF between January 2011 and May 2017 were included. All patients were in-hospital for at least 48 h after catheter ablation. The primary outcome was defined as peri-procedural thrombo-embolic events. The secondary outcome was any bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). The mean age of the patients was 63.3 years. Phenprocoumon was prescribed in 929 (42%) of the cases, and in 697 (31%) dabigatran, 399 (18%) rivaroxaban, and 194 (9%) apixaban. During hospitalization, 37 (1.6%) thrombo-embolic events occurred, including 23 transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs). Compared with the use of phenoprocoumon, the use of DOAC was significantly associated with a lower thrombo-embolic risk [16 (1.2%) vs. 21 (2.2%), odds ratio (OR)], 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.9], P = 0.04. No statistically significant association with bleeding risk was observed [phenprocomoun: 122 (13%); DOAC: 163 (12.6%); OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2); P = 0.70]. Interruption of oral anticoagulation (OAC) was associated with an increased risk for thrombo-embolic complications [OR 2.2 (1.1-4.3); P = 0.031], and bleeding [OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.8-3.2), P = 0.001].

Conclusion: In patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, the use of DOAC was associated with a reduced risk of thrombo-embolic events compared with phenprocoumon. Non-interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy was associated with a reduced risk of peri-procedural thrombo-embolic and any bleeding complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信