亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的神经心理表现、物质滥用与再犯。

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ángel Romero-Martínez, Marisol Lila, Carolina Sarrate-Costa, Javier Comes-Fayos, Luis Moya-Albiol
{"title":"亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的神经心理表现、物质滥用与再犯。","authors":"Ángel Romero-Martínez,&nbsp;Marisol Lila,&nbsp;Carolina Sarrate-Costa,&nbsp;Javier Comes-Fayos,&nbsp;Luis Moya-Albiol","doi":"10.5093/pi2022a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has pointed out the importance of neuropsychological impairments in intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators for reoffending/recidivism once treatment ends. However, less is known about whether substance misuse is associated with impairments or deficits, which facilitate recidivism. In this study, we first aimed to assess whether IPV perpetrators with (<i>n</i> = 104) and without (<i>n</i> = 120) substance misuse showed differences in specific neuropsychological variables in comparison with non-violent men (<i>n</i> = 82). Second, we examined whether there were differences in IPV perpetrators' recidivism and whether these differences were explained by neuropsychological performance. Our results revealed that IPV perpetrators with substance misuse showed worse cognitive performance than controls. Furthermore, we also found differences between IPV perpetrators without substance misuse and controls, but only in terms of executive functioning. There were no differences in neuropsychological performance between the two groups of IPV perpetrators, although those with substance misuse presented higher recidivism rates than those without substance misuse. Finally, cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, and worse attention functioning were related to high recidivism in both groups of IPV perpetrators. This study underlies the importance of performing neuropsychological assessments during the initial stages of intervention programs for IPV perpetrators in order to design coadjutant neuropsychological/cognitive training to address not only the psychological needs (including substance misuse) of IPV perpetrators, but also their neuropsychological needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51641,"journal":{"name":"Psychosocial Intervention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/08/1132-0559-pi-32-2-0069.PMC10294454.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychological Performance, Substance Misuse, and Recidivism in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Romero-Martínez,&nbsp;Marisol Lila,&nbsp;Carolina Sarrate-Costa,&nbsp;Javier Comes-Fayos,&nbsp;Luis Moya-Albiol\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/pi2022a7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research has pointed out the importance of neuropsychological impairments in intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators for reoffending/recidivism once treatment ends. However, less is known about whether substance misuse is associated with impairments or deficits, which facilitate recidivism. In this study, we first aimed to assess whether IPV perpetrators with (<i>n</i> = 104) and without (<i>n</i> = 120) substance misuse showed differences in specific neuropsychological variables in comparison with non-violent men (<i>n</i> = 82). Second, we examined whether there were differences in IPV perpetrators' recidivism and whether these differences were explained by neuropsychological performance. Our results revealed that IPV perpetrators with substance misuse showed worse cognitive performance than controls. Furthermore, we also found differences between IPV perpetrators without substance misuse and controls, but only in terms of executive functioning. There were no differences in neuropsychological performance between the two groups of IPV perpetrators, although those with substance misuse presented higher recidivism rates than those without substance misuse. Finally, cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, and worse attention functioning were related to high recidivism in both groups of IPV perpetrators. This study underlies the importance of performing neuropsychological assessments during the initial stages of intervention programs for IPV perpetrators in order to design coadjutant neuropsychological/cognitive training to address not only the psychological needs (including substance misuse) of IPV perpetrators, but also their neuropsychological needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychosocial Intervention\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/08/1132-0559-pi-32-2-0069.PMC10294454.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychosocial Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2022a7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosocial Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2022a7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

先前的研究指出,亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)施暴者的神经心理障碍对治疗结束后再犯/再犯的重要性。然而,人们对药物滥用是否与损伤或缺陷有关知之甚少,而损伤或缺陷会促进再犯。在这项研究中,我们首先旨在评估与非暴力男性(n = 82)相比,有(n = 104)和没有(n = 120)药物滥用的IPV肇事者在特定神经心理变量上是否存在差异。其次,我们考察了IPV行凶者的累犯是否存在差异,以及这些差异是否可以用神经心理表现来解释。我们的研究结果显示,药物滥用的IPV肇事者表现出比对照组更差的认知表现。此外,我们还发现没有药物滥用和控制的IPV犯罪者之间存在差异,但仅在执行功能方面存在差异。两组IPV犯罪者的神经心理表现没有差异,尽管药物滥用者的再犯率高于非药物滥用者。最后,认知灵活性、语言流畅性和较差的注意力功能与两组IPV犯罪者的高再犯率有关。本研究强调了在IPV施暴者干预计划的初始阶段进行神经心理学评估的重要性,以便设计辅助神经心理学/认知训练,不仅解决IPV施暴者的心理需求(包括药物滥用),而且解决他们的神经心理学需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neuropsychological Performance, Substance Misuse, and Recidivism in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.

Neuropsychological Performance, Substance Misuse, and Recidivism in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.

Neuropsychological Performance, Substance Misuse, and Recidivism in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.

Neuropsychological Performance, Substance Misuse, and Recidivism in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.

Previous research has pointed out the importance of neuropsychological impairments in intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators for reoffending/recidivism once treatment ends. However, less is known about whether substance misuse is associated with impairments or deficits, which facilitate recidivism. In this study, we first aimed to assess whether IPV perpetrators with (n = 104) and without (n = 120) substance misuse showed differences in specific neuropsychological variables in comparison with non-violent men (n = 82). Second, we examined whether there were differences in IPV perpetrators' recidivism and whether these differences were explained by neuropsychological performance. Our results revealed that IPV perpetrators with substance misuse showed worse cognitive performance than controls. Furthermore, we also found differences between IPV perpetrators without substance misuse and controls, but only in terms of executive functioning. There were no differences in neuropsychological performance between the two groups of IPV perpetrators, although those with substance misuse presented higher recidivism rates than those without substance misuse. Finally, cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, and worse attention functioning were related to high recidivism in both groups of IPV perpetrators. This study underlies the importance of performing neuropsychological assessments during the initial stages of intervention programs for IPV perpetrators in order to design coadjutant neuropsychological/cognitive training to address not only the psychological needs (including substance misuse) of IPV perpetrators, but also their neuropsychological needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychosocial Intervention
Psychosocial Intervention PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychosocial Intervention is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes papers in all areas relevant to psychosocial intervention at the individual, family, social networks, organization, community, and population levels. The Journal emphasizes an evidence-based perspective and welcomes papers reporting original basic and applied research, program evaluation, and intervention results. The journal will also feature integrative reviews, and specialized papers on theoretical advances and methodological issues. Psychosocial Intervention is committed to advance knowledge, and to provide scientific evidence informing psychosocial interventions tackling social and community problems, and promoting social welfare and quality of life. Psychosocial Intervention welcomes contributions from all areas of psychology and allied disciplines, such as sociology, social work, social epidemiology, and public health. Psychosocial Intervention aims to be international in scope, and will publish papers both in Spanish and English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信