制定多部门住院医师沟通培训计划。

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Aussama K Nassar, Marzena Sasnal, Rebecca K Miller-Kuhlmann, Rachel M Jensen, Rebecca L Blankenburg, Caroline E Rassbach, Mystique Smith-Bentley, Alpa Vyas, James R Korndorffer, Carl A Gold
{"title":"制定多部门住院医师沟通培训计划。","authors":"Aussama K Nassar,&nbsp;Marzena Sasnal,&nbsp;Rebecca K Miller-Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Rachel M Jensen,&nbsp;Rebecca L Blankenburg,&nbsp;Caroline E Rassbach,&nbsp;Mystique Smith-Bentley,&nbsp;Alpa Vyas,&nbsp;James R Korndorffer,&nbsp;Carl A Gold","doi":"10.4103/efh.efh_357_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local needs assessments in our institution's surgery and neurology residency programs identified barriers to effective communication, such as no shared communication framework and limited feedback on nontechnical clinical skills. Residents identified faculty-led coaching as a desired educational intervention to improve communication skills. Three university departments (Surgery, Neurology, and Pediatrics) and health-care system leaders collaborated closely to develop an innovative communication coaching initiative generalizable to other residency programs.</p><p><strong>Innovation: </strong>Coaching program development involved several layers of collaboration between health-care system leaders, faculty educators, and departmental communication champions. The efforts included: (1) creating and delivering communication skills training to faculty and residents; (2) hosting frequent meetings among various stakeholders to develop program strategy, discuss opportunities and learnings, and engage other medical educators interested in coaching; (3) obtaining funding to implement the coaching initiative; (4) selecting coaches and providing salary and training support.</p><p><strong>Evaluation: </strong>A multi-phased mixed-methods study utilized online surveys and virtual semi-structured interviews to assess the program's quality and impact on the communication culture and the satisfaction and communication skills of residents. Quantitative and qualitative data have been integrated during data collection and analysis using embedding, building, and merging strategies.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Establishing a multi-departmental coaching program may be feasible and can be adapted by other programs if similar resources and focus are present. We found that stakeholders' buy-in, financial support, protected faculty time, flexible approach, and rigorous evaluation are crucial factors in successfully implementing and sustaining such an initiative.</p>","PeriodicalId":46742,"journal":{"name":"Education for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a multi-departmental residency communication coaching program.\",\"authors\":\"Aussama K Nassar,&nbsp;Marzena Sasnal,&nbsp;Rebecca K Miller-Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Rachel M Jensen,&nbsp;Rebecca L Blankenburg,&nbsp;Caroline E Rassbach,&nbsp;Mystique Smith-Bentley,&nbsp;Alpa Vyas,&nbsp;James R Korndorffer,&nbsp;Carl A Gold\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/efh.efh_357_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local needs assessments in our institution's surgery and neurology residency programs identified barriers to effective communication, such as no shared communication framework and limited feedback on nontechnical clinical skills. Residents identified faculty-led coaching as a desired educational intervention to improve communication skills. Three university departments (Surgery, Neurology, and Pediatrics) and health-care system leaders collaborated closely to develop an innovative communication coaching initiative generalizable to other residency programs.</p><p><strong>Innovation: </strong>Coaching program development involved several layers of collaboration between health-care system leaders, faculty educators, and departmental communication champions. The efforts included: (1) creating and delivering communication skills training to faculty and residents; (2) hosting frequent meetings among various stakeholders to develop program strategy, discuss opportunities and learnings, and engage other medical educators interested in coaching; (3) obtaining funding to implement the coaching initiative; (4) selecting coaches and providing salary and training support.</p><p><strong>Evaluation: </strong>A multi-phased mixed-methods study utilized online surveys and virtual semi-structured interviews to assess the program's quality and impact on the communication culture and the satisfaction and communication skills of residents. Quantitative and qualitative data have been integrated during data collection and analysis using embedding, building, and merging strategies.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Establishing a multi-departmental coaching program may be feasible and can be adapted by other programs if similar resources and focus are present. We found that stakeholders' buy-in, financial support, protected faculty time, flexible approach, and rigorous evaluation are crucial factors in successfully implementing and sustaining such an initiative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.efh_357_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.efh_357_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:我们机构外科和神经内科住院医师项目的当地需求评估发现了有效沟通的障碍,如缺乏共享的沟通框架和对非技术临床技能的有限反馈。居民们认为教师主导的指导是一种理想的教育干预,可以提高沟通技巧。三个大学院系(外科、神经病学和儿科)和卫生保健系统的领导者密切合作,开发了一项创新的沟通指导计划,可推广到其他住院医师项目。创新:培训项目的开发涉及医疗保健系统领导者、教师教育者和部门沟通倡导者之间的多层合作。这些努力包括:(1)为教师和住院医生创建和提供沟通技巧培训;(2)在各利益相关方之间频繁召开会议,制定项目战略,讨论机会和学习,并吸引其他对教练感兴趣的医学教育者;(3)获得实施辅导计划的资金;(4)选拔教练员,提供薪酬和培训支持。评估:一项多阶段混合方法研究利用在线调查和虚拟半结构化访谈来评估项目的质量及其对沟通文化、居民满意度和沟通技巧的影响。通过嵌入、构建和合并策略,在数据收集和分析过程中集成了定量和定性数据。讨论和启示:建立一个多部门的指导计划是可行的,如果有类似的资源和重点,可以由其他计划进行调整。我们发现,利益相关者的支持、财政支持、受保护的教师时间、灵活的方法和严格的评估是成功实施和维持这一计划的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a multi-departmental residency communication coaching program.

Background: Local needs assessments in our institution's surgery and neurology residency programs identified barriers to effective communication, such as no shared communication framework and limited feedback on nontechnical clinical skills. Residents identified faculty-led coaching as a desired educational intervention to improve communication skills. Three university departments (Surgery, Neurology, and Pediatrics) and health-care system leaders collaborated closely to develop an innovative communication coaching initiative generalizable to other residency programs.

Innovation: Coaching program development involved several layers of collaboration between health-care system leaders, faculty educators, and departmental communication champions. The efforts included: (1) creating and delivering communication skills training to faculty and residents; (2) hosting frequent meetings among various stakeholders to develop program strategy, discuss opportunities and learnings, and engage other medical educators interested in coaching; (3) obtaining funding to implement the coaching initiative; (4) selecting coaches and providing salary and training support.

Evaluation: A multi-phased mixed-methods study utilized online surveys and virtual semi-structured interviews to assess the program's quality and impact on the communication culture and the satisfaction and communication skills of residents. Quantitative and qualitative data have been integrated during data collection and analysis using embedding, building, and merging strategies.

Discussion and implications: Establishing a multi-departmental coaching program may be feasible and can be adapted by other programs if similar resources and focus are present. We found that stakeholders' buy-in, financial support, protected faculty time, flexible approach, and rigorous evaluation are crucial factors in successfully implementing and sustaining such an initiative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Health
Education for Health EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH) is the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal of The Network: Towards Unity for Health. Our readers are health professionals, health professions educators and learners, health care researchers, policymakers, community leaders and administrators from all over the world. We publish original studies, reviews, think pieces, works in progress and commentaries on current trends, issues, and controversies. We especially want to provide our international readers with fresh ideas and innovative models of education and health services that can enable them to be maximally responsive to the healthcare needs of the communities in which they work and learn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信