{"title":"正念结合在线运动(MOVE)与成人慢性疼痛自我管理指南的比较:一项可行性随机对照试验。","authors":"Orla Deegan, Brona M Fullen, Maire-Brid Casey, Ricardo Segurado, Conor Hearty, Catherine Doody","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited studies exist combining mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and exercise in a pain management programme (PMP), with none thus far delivering a combined intervention as an online PMP. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a combined MBSR and exercise online PMP for adults with chronic pain and to examine the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing MBSR and exercise delivered online with an online self-management guide.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A feasibility RCT was conducted with participants randomized into the MOVE group (8-wk MBSR and exercise live online) or the self-management (SM) group (8-wk online self-management guide). Primary outcomes included recruitment, attrition, intervention adherence, and satisfaction. Participants wore a Fitbit watch during the study and completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline, postintervention, and 12-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six participants were randomized and 80 (83.3%) completed the interventions. Higher mean satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8) was reported in the MOVE group 26.2 (±5.5) than the SM group 19.4 (±5.6). The Patient Global Impression of Change scale showed favourable changes in both groups; 65.1% of the MOVE group, 42.3% of the SM group reporting improvement. Seventy-three participants (76.3%) adhered to wearing the Fitbit for 8 weeks. Comparable improvements postintervention and at a 12-week follow-up were noted within both groups for Brief Pain Inventory, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, Pain Catastrophising Scale, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire and Short Form-36 Health Survey.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest both interventions explored are acceptable and feasible. A fully powered RCT examining the effectiveness of MBSR combined with exercise, delivered live online is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":"39 8","pages":"394-407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindfulness Combined With Exercise Online (MOVE) Compared With a Self-management Guide for Adults With Chronic Pain: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Orla Deegan, Brona M Fullen, Maire-Brid Casey, Ricardo Segurado, Conor Hearty, Catherine Doody\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited studies exist combining mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and exercise in a pain management programme (PMP), with none thus far delivering a combined intervention as an online PMP. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a combined MBSR and exercise online PMP for adults with chronic pain and to examine the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing MBSR and exercise delivered online with an online self-management guide.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A feasibility RCT was conducted with participants randomized into the MOVE group (8-wk MBSR and exercise live online) or the self-management (SM) group (8-wk online self-management guide). Primary outcomes included recruitment, attrition, intervention adherence, and satisfaction. Participants wore a Fitbit watch during the study and completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline, postintervention, and 12-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six participants were randomized and 80 (83.3%) completed the interventions. Higher mean satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8) was reported in the MOVE group 26.2 (±5.5) than the SM group 19.4 (±5.6). The Patient Global Impression of Change scale showed favourable changes in both groups; 65.1% of the MOVE group, 42.3% of the SM group reporting improvement. Seventy-three participants (76.3%) adhered to wearing the Fitbit for 8 weeks. Comparable improvements postintervention and at a 12-week follow-up were noted within both groups for Brief Pain Inventory, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, Pain Catastrophising Scale, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire and Short Form-36 Health Survey.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest both interventions explored are acceptable and feasible. A fully powered RCT examining the effectiveness of MBSR combined with exercise, delivered live online is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"394-407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001126\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mindfulness Combined With Exercise Online (MOVE) Compared With a Self-management Guide for Adults With Chronic Pain: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.
Objective: Limited studies exist combining mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and exercise in a pain management programme (PMP), with none thus far delivering a combined intervention as an online PMP. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a combined MBSR and exercise online PMP for adults with chronic pain and to examine the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing MBSR and exercise delivered online with an online self-management guide.
Materials and methods: A feasibility RCT was conducted with participants randomized into the MOVE group (8-wk MBSR and exercise live online) or the self-management (SM) group (8-wk online self-management guide). Primary outcomes included recruitment, attrition, intervention adherence, and satisfaction. Participants wore a Fitbit watch during the study and completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline, postintervention, and 12-week follow-up.
Results: Ninety-six participants were randomized and 80 (83.3%) completed the interventions. Higher mean satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8) was reported in the MOVE group 26.2 (±5.5) than the SM group 19.4 (±5.6). The Patient Global Impression of Change scale showed favourable changes in both groups; 65.1% of the MOVE group, 42.3% of the SM group reporting improvement. Seventy-three participants (76.3%) adhered to wearing the Fitbit for 8 weeks. Comparable improvements postintervention and at a 12-week follow-up were noted within both groups for Brief Pain Inventory, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, Pain Catastrophising Scale, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire and Short Form-36 Health Survey.
Discussion: The findings suggest both interventions explored are acceptable and feasible. A fully powered RCT examining the effectiveness of MBSR combined with exercise, delivered live online is warranted.
期刊介绍：
The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
