发展访问促进者的角色,以协助医生在门诊咨询医疗实践

Elizabeth A. Gilman MD , Christopher Aakre MD , Adam Meyers MBA , Nerissa Collins MD , Chrissy VerNess MA , Brian Dougan MD , Xiomari Davis MEd , Lindsey Philpot PhD, MPH , Priya Ramar MPH , Ivana Croghan PhD , Darrell R. Schroeder MS , Erin Pagel MS, MHI , Karthik Ghosh MD , Ryan T. Hurt MD, PhD
{"title":"发展访问促进者的角色,以协助医生在门诊咨询医疗实践","authors":"Elizabeth A. Gilman MD ,&nbsp;Christopher Aakre MD ,&nbsp;Adam Meyers MBA ,&nbsp;Nerissa Collins MD ,&nbsp;Chrissy VerNess MA ,&nbsp;Brian Dougan MD ,&nbsp;Xiomari Davis MEd ,&nbsp;Lindsey Philpot PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Priya Ramar MPH ,&nbsp;Ivana Croghan PhD ,&nbsp;Darrell R. Schroeder MS ,&nbsp;Erin Pagel MS, MHI ,&nbsp;Karthik Ghosh MD ,&nbsp;Ryan T. Hurt MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To decrease the electronic health record (EHR) clerical burden and improve patient/clinician satisfaction, allied health staff were trained as visit facilitators (VFs) to assist the physician in clinical and administrative tasks.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>From December 7, 2020, to October 11, 2021, patients with complex medical conditions were evaluated by an internal medicine physician in an outpatient general internal medicine (GIM) consultative practice at a tertiary care institution. A VF assisted with specific tasks before, during, and after the clinical visit. Presurvey and postsurvey assessments were performed to understand the effect of the VF on clinical tasks as perceived by the physician.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 57 GIM physicians used a VF, and 41 (82%) physicians and 39 (79%) physicians completed the pre-VF and post-VF surveys, respectively. Physicians reported a significant reduction in time reviewing outside materials, updating pertinent information, and creating/modifying EHR orders (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Clinicians reported improved interactions with patients and on-time completion of clinical documentation. In the pre-VF survey, “too much time spent” was the most common response for reviewing outside material, placing/modifying orders, completing documentation/clinical notes, resolving in-baskets, completing dismissal letters, and completing tasks outside of work hours. In the post-VF survey, “too much time spent” was not the most common answer to any question. Satisfaction improved in all areas (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>VFs significantly reduced the EHR clinical burden and improved GIM physician practice satisfaction. This model can potentially be used in a wide range of medical practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/88/main.PMC10196913.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Visit Facilitator Role to Assist Physicians in an Ambulatory Consultative Medical Practice\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A. Gilman MD ,&nbsp;Christopher Aakre MD ,&nbsp;Adam Meyers MBA ,&nbsp;Nerissa Collins MD ,&nbsp;Chrissy VerNess MA ,&nbsp;Brian Dougan MD ,&nbsp;Xiomari Davis MEd ,&nbsp;Lindsey Philpot PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Priya Ramar MPH ,&nbsp;Ivana Croghan PhD ,&nbsp;Darrell R. Schroeder MS ,&nbsp;Erin Pagel MS, MHI ,&nbsp;Karthik Ghosh MD ,&nbsp;Ryan T. Hurt MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To decrease the electronic health record (EHR) clerical burden and improve patient/clinician satisfaction, allied health staff were trained as visit facilitators (VFs) to assist the physician in clinical and administrative tasks.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>From December 7, 2020, to October 11, 2021, patients with complex medical conditions were evaluated by an internal medicine physician in an outpatient general internal medicine (GIM) consultative practice at a tertiary care institution. A VF assisted with specific tasks before, during, and after the clinical visit. Presurvey and postsurvey assessments were performed to understand the effect of the VF on clinical tasks as perceived by the physician.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 57 GIM physicians used a VF, and 41 (82%) physicians and 39 (79%) physicians completed the pre-VF and post-VF surveys, respectively. Physicians reported a significant reduction in time reviewing outside materials, updating pertinent information, and creating/modifying EHR orders (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Clinicians reported improved interactions with patients and on-time completion of clinical documentation. In the pre-VF survey, “too much time spent” was the most common response for reviewing outside material, placing/modifying orders, completing documentation/clinical notes, resolving in-baskets, completing dismissal letters, and completing tasks outside of work hours. In the post-VF survey, “too much time spent” was not the most common answer to any question. Satisfaction improved in all areas (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>VFs significantly reduced the EHR clinical burden and improved GIM physician practice satisfaction. This model can potentially be used in a wide range of medical practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/88/main.PMC10196913.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254245482300019X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254245482300019X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为减轻电子病历(EHR)文书工作负担,提高医患满意度,培训专职医疗人员为会诊辅导员(VFs),协助医生完成临床和行政工作。患者和方法从2020年12月7日至2021年10月11日,在一家三级医疗机构的门诊普通内科(GIM)咨询实践中,由一名内科医生对患有复杂疾病的患者进行评估。VF在临床访问之前、期间和之后协助完成特定任务。进行调查前和调查后评估,以了解VF对医生所感知的临床任务的影响。结果共有57名GIM医生使用了VF, 41名(82%)医生和39名(79%)医生分别完成了VF前和VF后的调查。医生报告说,审查外部材料、更新相关信息和创建/修改电子病历单的时间显著减少(P< 0.05)。临床医生报告与患者的互动有所改善,并按时完成临床文件。在vf之前的调查中,“花费太多时间”是审查外部材料、下/修改订单、完成文档/临床记录、解决收件箱、完成解雇信和完成工作时间以外的任务时最常见的回答。在vf之后的调查中,“花费太多时间”并不是对任何问题最常见的回答。各方面满意度均有提高(p < 0.05)。结论vfs显著减轻了EHR的临床负担,提高了GIM医师的执业满意度。该模型可广泛应用于医疗实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Visit Facilitator Role to Assist Physicians in an Ambulatory Consultative Medical Practice

Objective

To decrease the electronic health record (EHR) clerical burden and improve patient/clinician satisfaction, allied health staff were trained as visit facilitators (VFs) to assist the physician in clinical and administrative tasks.

Patients and Methods

From December 7, 2020, to October 11, 2021, patients with complex medical conditions were evaluated by an internal medicine physician in an outpatient general internal medicine (GIM) consultative practice at a tertiary care institution. A VF assisted with specific tasks before, during, and after the clinical visit. Presurvey and postsurvey assessments were performed to understand the effect of the VF on clinical tasks as perceived by the physician.

Results

A total of 57 GIM physicians used a VF, and 41 (82%) physicians and 39 (79%) physicians completed the pre-VF and post-VF surveys, respectively. Physicians reported a significant reduction in time reviewing outside materials, updating pertinent information, and creating/modifying EHR orders (P<.05). Clinicians reported improved interactions with patients and on-time completion of clinical documentation. In the pre-VF survey, “too much time spent” was the most common response for reviewing outside material, placing/modifying orders, completing documentation/clinical notes, resolving in-baskets, completing dismissal letters, and completing tasks outside of work hours. In the post-VF survey, “too much time spent” was not the most common answer to any question. Satisfaction improved in all areas (P<.05).

Conclusion

VFs significantly reduced the EHR clinical burden and improved GIM physician practice satisfaction. This model can potentially be used in a wide range of medical practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信