“Alexa,疫情让你变得更聪明了吗?”虚拟助理对产前询问的回应的后续内容分析。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Informatics for Health & Social Care Pub Date : 2023-07-03 Epub Date: 2022-08-23 DOI:10.1080/17538157.2022.2110107
Christa Palancia Esposito, Jennifer Schindler-Ruwisch
{"title":"“Alexa,疫情让你变得更聪明了吗?”虚拟助理对产前询问的回应的后续内容分析。","authors":"Christa Palancia Esposito,&nbsp;Jennifer Schindler-Ruwisch","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2022.2110107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare responses to 40 common prenatal questions from Amazon's virtual assistant, Alexa, one year apart during the COVID pandemic. Participants: Two researchers replicated a prenatal query using unique Alexa devices. A conceptual content analysis was conducted where the researchers independently queried Alexa the identical questions from their 2020 study during the same one-week timeframe, between May 20, 2021 and May 27, 2021. Alexa's responses were compared to the 2020 study and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists data and verified by one of the researchers, a Certified Nurse Midwife. Alexa provided accurate responses to 26 (65%) of the questions, an increase by 55 percentage points from 2020. Alexa was able to recite the symptoms of COVID-19 illness but was unable to provide a response to the two other COVID-specific questions. Compared to the 2020 query, Alexa provided more reputable sources for the responses including the CDC, WHO, NIH, and Mayo Clinic. Alexa's ability to provide more accurate, evidence-based responses was remarkably improved in 2021. Mobile health tools, like Amazon Alexa, are highly utilized by the public, particularly with limited healthcare access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology-based platforms should provide credible, evidence-based content.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Alexa, did the pandemic make you smarter?\\\" A follow up content analysis of a virtual assistant's responses to a prenatal query.\",\"authors\":\"Christa Palancia Esposito,&nbsp;Jennifer Schindler-Ruwisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538157.2022.2110107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To compare responses to 40 common prenatal questions from Amazon's virtual assistant, Alexa, one year apart during the COVID pandemic. Participants: Two researchers replicated a prenatal query using unique Alexa devices. A conceptual content analysis was conducted where the researchers independently queried Alexa the identical questions from their 2020 study during the same one-week timeframe, between May 20, 2021 and May 27, 2021. Alexa's responses were compared to the 2020 study and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists data and verified by one of the researchers, a Certified Nurse Midwife. Alexa provided accurate responses to 26 (65%) of the questions, an increase by 55 percentage points from 2020. Alexa was able to recite the symptoms of COVID-19 illness but was unable to provide a response to the two other COVID-specific questions. Compared to the 2020 query, Alexa provided more reputable sources for the responses including the CDC, WHO, NIH, and Mayo Clinic. Alexa's ability to provide more accurate, evidence-based responses was remarkably improved in 2021. Mobile health tools, like Amazon Alexa, are highly utilized by the public, particularly with limited healthcare access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology-based platforms should provide credible, evidence-based content.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatics for Health & Social Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatics for Health & Social Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2022.2110107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2022.2110107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较亚马逊虚拟助理Alexa在新冠肺炎疫情期间对40个常见产前问题的回答。参与者:两名研究人员使用独特的Alexa设备复制了一个产前查询。进行了一项概念内容分析,研究人员在2021年5月20日至2021年5日27日的同一周时间内,独立地向Alexa询问了他们2020年研究中的相同问题。Alexa的回答与2020年的研究和美国妇产科学院的数据进行了比较,并由其中一名研究人员,一名注册助产士进行了验证。Alexa对26个问题(65%)做出了准确回答,比2020年增加了55个百分点。Alexa能够背诵新冠肺炎的症状,但无法回答其他两个特定于新冠肺炎的问题。与2020年的查询相比,Alexa提供了更可靠的回复来源,包括美国疾病控制与预防中心、世界卫生组织、美国国立卫生研究院和梅奥诊所。Alexa提供更准确、循证反应的能力在2021年显著提高。移动健康工具,如Amazon Alexa,被公众高度利用,尤其是在新冠肺炎大流行期间,医疗服务有限。基于技术的平台应该提供可信的、基于证据的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Alexa, did the pandemic make you smarter?" A follow up content analysis of a virtual assistant's responses to a prenatal query.

To compare responses to 40 common prenatal questions from Amazon's virtual assistant, Alexa, one year apart during the COVID pandemic. Participants: Two researchers replicated a prenatal query using unique Alexa devices. A conceptual content analysis was conducted where the researchers independently queried Alexa the identical questions from their 2020 study during the same one-week timeframe, between May 20, 2021 and May 27, 2021. Alexa's responses were compared to the 2020 study and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists data and verified by one of the researchers, a Certified Nurse Midwife. Alexa provided accurate responses to 26 (65%) of the questions, an increase by 55 percentage points from 2020. Alexa was able to recite the symptoms of COVID-19 illness but was unable to provide a response to the two other COVID-specific questions. Compared to the 2020 query, Alexa provided more reputable sources for the responses including the CDC, WHO, NIH, and Mayo Clinic. Alexa's ability to provide more accurate, evidence-based responses was remarkably improved in 2021. Mobile health tools, like Amazon Alexa, are highly utilized by the public, particularly with limited healthcare access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology-based platforms should provide credible, evidence-based content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus. The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems. Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects. Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome. Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信