急性大血管闭塞血栓切除术后颅内血管成形术保释的随机研究(ANGEL-REBOOT):多中心随机对照试验方案。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Feng Gao, Xu Tong, Baixue Jia, Ming Yang, Yuesong Pan, Zeguang Ren, William Scott Burgin, Liping Liu, Xingquan Zhao, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang, Zhongrong Miao
{"title":"急性大血管闭塞血栓切除术后颅内血管成形术保释的随机研究(ANGEL-REBOOT):多中心随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Feng Gao, Xu Tong, Baixue Jia, Ming Yang, Yuesong Pan, Zeguang Ren, William Scott Burgin, Liping Liu, Xingquan Zhao, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang, Zhongrong Miao","doi":"10.1136/svn-2023-002433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Unsuccessful thrombectomy of acute large vessel occlusions (LVOs) has been associated with unfavourable outcomes. Multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have reported a failure rate of 12%-41% for thrombectomy procedures. Various factors contribute to failed thrombectomy, including technical difficulties in accessing the occlusion, unsuccessful thrombus retrieval, thrombotic reocclusion and pre-existing intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Although some studies have explored balloon dilation or permanent stenting as rescue intracranial angioplasty for failed thrombectomy in individual cases, there is currently no evidence from RCTs on this specific topic.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the potential superiority of bailout angioplasty over standard treatment in cases of unsuccessful recanalisation (eTICI 0 to 2a) or residual severe stenosis (>70%) after thrombectomy in acute LVO patients within 24 hours of stroke onset.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial designed by investigators. It compares bailout angioplasty with standard therapy and follows an open-label treatment approach while maintaining a blinded outcome assessment (PROBE design). Our objective is to allocate 348 patients in a 1:1 ratio to either receive bailout angioplasty as an intervention or standard therapy as a control, following unsuccessful thrombectomy.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>The main measure of interest is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score, which will be assessed in a blinded manner at 90 (±14) days following randomisation. The primary effect size will be determined using ordered logistic regression to calculate the common OR, representing the shift on the six-category mRS Scale at the 90-day mark. Additionally, the safety outcomes will be evaluated, including symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 18-36 hours, severe procedure-related complications and mortality within 90 (±14) days, among others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The ANGEL-REBOOT study aims to generate substantial evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of bailout intracranial angioplasty as a treatment option for patients with LVO who have experienced unsuccessful thrombectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05122286.</p>","PeriodicalId":22021,"journal":{"name":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11103159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised study of bailout intracranial angioplasty following thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion (ANGEL-REBOOT): protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Feng Gao, Xu Tong, Baixue Jia, Ming Yang, Yuesong Pan, Zeguang Ren, William Scott Burgin, Liping Liu, Xingquan Zhao, Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang, Zhongrong Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/svn-2023-002433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Unsuccessful thrombectomy of acute large vessel occlusions (LVOs) has been associated with unfavourable outcomes. Multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have reported a failure rate of 12%-41% for thrombectomy procedures. Various factors contribute to failed thrombectomy, including technical difficulties in accessing the occlusion, unsuccessful thrombus retrieval, thrombotic reocclusion and pre-existing intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Although some studies have explored balloon dilation or permanent stenting as rescue intracranial angioplasty for failed thrombectomy in individual cases, there is currently no evidence from RCTs on this specific topic.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the potential superiority of bailout angioplasty over standard treatment in cases of unsuccessful recanalisation (eTICI 0 to 2a) or residual severe stenosis (>70%) after thrombectomy in acute LVO patients within 24 hours of stroke onset.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial designed by investigators. It compares bailout angioplasty with standard therapy and follows an open-label treatment approach while maintaining a blinded outcome assessment (PROBE design). Our objective is to allocate 348 patients in a 1:1 ratio to either receive bailout angioplasty as an intervention or standard therapy as a control, following unsuccessful thrombectomy.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>The main measure of interest is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score, which will be assessed in a blinded manner at 90 (±14) days following randomisation. The primary effect size will be determined using ordered logistic regression to calculate the common OR, representing the shift on the six-category mRS Scale at the 90-day mark. Additionally, the safety outcomes will be evaluated, including symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 18-36 hours, severe procedure-related complications and mortality within 90 (±14) days, among others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The ANGEL-REBOOT study aims to generate substantial evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of bailout intracranial angioplasty as a treatment option for patients with LVO who have experienced unsuccessful thrombectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05122286.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke and Vascular Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"181-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11103159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke and Vascular Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2023-002433\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2023-002433","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:急性大血管闭塞(LVO)血栓切除术的失败与不良预后有关。多项随机对照试验(RCT)显示,血栓切除术的失败率为 12%-41%。导致血栓切除术失败的因素有很多,包括进入闭塞部位的技术困难、血栓取回不成功、血栓再闭塞以及预先存在的颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄。尽管一些研究探讨了球囊扩张或永久性支架植入术作为个别病例血栓切除术失败后的颅内血管成形术抢救方法,但目前还没有关于这一特定主题的研究性临床试验证据。目的:评估在卒中发生后24小时内,急性低密度脂蛋白血栓形成患者血栓切除术后再通不成功(eTICI 0至2a)或残留严重狭窄(>70%)的情况下,抢救性血管成形术相对于标准治疗的潜在优势:本研究是一项由研究人员设计的多中心、前瞻性、随机对照临床试验。该研究比较了保外血管成形术和标准疗法,并采用开放标签治疗方法,同时保持盲法结果评估(PROBE 设计)。我们的目标是将 348 名患者按 1:1 的比例分配,在血栓切除术不成功后接受保外血管成形术作为干预,或接受标准疗法作为对照:主要衡量指标是改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,将在随机分配后90(±14)天以盲法进行评估。主要效应大小将通过有序逻辑回归来确定,以计算普通OR,代表90天时六类mRS量表的变化。此外,还将评估安全性结果,包括18-36小时内无症状性颅内出血、严重手术相关并发症和90(±14)天内死亡率等:讨论:ANGEL-REBOOT研究旨在为颅内血管成形术的疗效和安全性提供实质性证据,并将其作为血栓切除术失败的低密度脂蛋白血症患者的一种治疗选择:NCT05122286.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomised study of bailout intracranial angioplasty following thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion (ANGEL-REBOOT): protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Rationale: Unsuccessful thrombectomy of acute large vessel occlusions (LVOs) has been associated with unfavourable outcomes. Multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have reported a failure rate of 12%-41% for thrombectomy procedures. Various factors contribute to failed thrombectomy, including technical difficulties in accessing the occlusion, unsuccessful thrombus retrieval, thrombotic reocclusion and pre-existing intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Although some studies have explored balloon dilation or permanent stenting as rescue intracranial angioplasty for failed thrombectomy in individual cases, there is currently no evidence from RCTs on this specific topic.

Aim: To evaluate the potential superiority of bailout angioplasty over standard treatment in cases of unsuccessful recanalisation (eTICI 0 to 2a) or residual severe stenosis (>70%) after thrombectomy in acute LVO patients within 24 hours of stroke onset.

Design: This study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial designed by investigators. It compares bailout angioplasty with standard therapy and follows an open-label treatment approach while maintaining a blinded outcome assessment (PROBE design). Our objective is to allocate 348 patients in a 1:1 ratio to either receive bailout angioplasty as an intervention or standard therapy as a control, following unsuccessful thrombectomy.

Outcome: The main measure of interest is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score, which will be assessed in a blinded manner at 90 (±14) days following randomisation. The primary effect size will be determined using ordered logistic regression to calculate the common OR, representing the shift on the six-category mRS Scale at the 90-day mark. Additionally, the safety outcomes will be evaluated, including symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 18-36 hours, severe procedure-related complications and mortality within 90 (±14) days, among others.

Discussion: The ANGEL-REBOOT study aims to generate substantial evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of bailout intracranial angioplasty as a treatment option for patients with LVO who have experienced unsuccessful thrombectomy.

Trial registration number: NCT05122286.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke and Vascular Neurology
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Stroke and Vascular Neurology (SVN) is the official journal of the Chinese Stroke Association. Supported by a team of renowned Editors, and fully Open Access, the journal encourages debate on controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信