预测早产儿是否需要表面活性疗法的生化和肺功能测试准确性:系统回顾

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1159/000527670
Anna Lavizzari, Chiara Veneroni
{"title":"预测早产儿是否需要表面活性疗法的生化和肺功能测试准确性:系统回顾","authors":"Anna Lavizzari, Chiara Veneroni","doi":"10.1159/000527670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We evaluate the accuracy of postnatal biochemical and lung function tests performed within 3 h from birth for predicting surfactant need in preterm infants ≤34 weeks' gestation receiving noninvasive respiratory support for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, and clinicaltrials.gov databases for studies published from 2000 to November 10, 2021, cross-referencing relevant literature and contacting experts. We included diagnostic accuracy studies and systematic reviews of biochemical or lung function tests identifying the need for surfactant in preterm neonates ≤34 weeks' with RDS not intubated at birth. The authors individually assessed the risk of bias following a tailored QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies, including 810 infants, met the inclusion criteria. Four tests were included: the click test, the stable microbubble test, the lamellar body count on gastric aspirates, and the forced oscillation technique. The reference standards were transparent criteria for distinguishing the infants according to oxygen requirement, which reflected the current criteria for surfactant therapy. The risk of bias was judged high because of the population selection and exclusion of participants from the analysis. There were no serious concerns regarding blinding and applicability. The individual study sensitivity and specificity range from 0.60 to 1 and from 0.51 to 0.91, respectively. It was not appropriate to combine the accuracy estimates in a meta-analysis because of the heterogeneity of the study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence is insufficient to recommend biochemical and lung function tests for tailoring surfactant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":"120 3","pages":"275-286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biochemical and Lung Function Test Accuracy for Predicting the Need for Surfactant Therapy in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Lavizzari, Chiara Veneroni\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000527670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We evaluate the accuracy of postnatal biochemical and lung function tests performed within 3 h from birth for predicting surfactant need in preterm infants ≤34 weeks' gestation receiving noninvasive respiratory support for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, and clinicaltrials.gov databases for studies published from 2000 to November 10, 2021, cross-referencing relevant literature and contacting experts. We included diagnostic accuracy studies and systematic reviews of biochemical or lung function tests identifying the need for surfactant in preterm neonates ≤34 weeks' with RDS not intubated at birth. The authors individually assessed the risk of bias following a tailored QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies, including 810 infants, met the inclusion criteria. Four tests were included: the click test, the stable microbubble test, the lamellar body count on gastric aspirates, and the forced oscillation technique. The reference standards were transparent criteria for distinguishing the infants according to oxygen requirement, which reflected the current criteria for surfactant therapy. The risk of bias was judged high because of the population selection and exclusion of participants from the analysis. There were no serious concerns regarding blinding and applicability. The individual study sensitivity and specificity range from 0.60 to 1 and from 0.51 to 0.91, respectively. It was not appropriate to combine the accuracy estimates in a meta-analysis because of the heterogeneity of the study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence is insufficient to recommend biochemical and lung function tests for tailoring surfactant therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neonatology\",\"volume\":\"120 3\",\"pages\":\"275-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527670\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介我们评估了出生后 3 小时内进行的生化和肺功能测试预测因呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)而接受无创呼吸支持治疗的妊娠 34 周以下早产儿对表面活性物质需求的准确性:我们系统检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、The Cochrane Library、PROSPERO 和 clinicaltrials.gov 数据库中 2000 年至 2021 年 11 月 10 日发表的研究,交叉引用了相关文献并联系了专家。我们纳入了有关生化或肺功能检测的诊断准确性研究和系统综述,这些检测可确定出生时未插管的≤34 周早产儿 RDS 是否需要使用表面活性物质。作者采用量身定制的 QUADAS-2 工具对偏倚风险进行了单独评估:八项研究(包括 810 名婴儿)符合纳入标准。其中包括四项测试:点击测试、稳定微泡测试、胃抽吸物片状体计数和强迫振荡技术。参考标准是根据氧气需求来区分婴儿的透明标准,这反映了目前表面活性治疗的标准。由于对人群进行了选择并将参与者排除在分析之外,因此判定偏倚风险较高。盲法和适用性方面没有严重问题。单项研究的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.60 至 1 和 0.51 至 0.91。由于研究特征的异质性,在荟萃分析中合并准确性估计值并不合适:目前的证据不足以推荐使用生化和肺功能检测来调整表面活性物质疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biochemical and Lung Function Test Accuracy for Predicting the Need for Surfactant Therapy in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: We evaluate the accuracy of postnatal biochemical and lung function tests performed within 3 h from birth for predicting surfactant need in preterm infants ≤34 weeks' gestation receiving noninvasive respiratory support for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, and clinicaltrials.gov databases for studies published from 2000 to November 10, 2021, cross-referencing relevant literature and contacting experts. We included diagnostic accuracy studies and systematic reviews of biochemical or lung function tests identifying the need for surfactant in preterm neonates ≤34 weeks' with RDS not intubated at birth. The authors individually assessed the risk of bias following a tailored QUADAS-2 tool.

Results: Eight studies, including 810 infants, met the inclusion criteria. Four tests were included: the click test, the stable microbubble test, the lamellar body count on gastric aspirates, and the forced oscillation technique. The reference standards were transparent criteria for distinguishing the infants according to oxygen requirement, which reflected the current criteria for surfactant therapy. The risk of bias was judged high because of the population selection and exclusion of participants from the analysis. There were no serious concerns regarding blinding and applicability. The individual study sensitivity and specificity range from 0.60 to 1 and from 0.51 to 0.91, respectively. It was not appropriate to combine the accuracy estimates in a meta-analysis because of the heterogeneity of the study characteristics.

Conclusions: Current evidence is insufficient to recommend biochemical and lung function tests for tailoring surfactant therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neonatology
Neonatology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信