他们被咬了:关于机构和提供者背叛的报道,以及与埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征患者当前症状、未满足的需求和医疗期望的联系。

Therapeutic advances in rare disease Pub Date : 2021-06-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26330040211022033
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Chrystal L Lewis, Sean McCabe, Emma C Lathan, Gabrielle A Agnew, Candice N Selwyn, Margaret E Gigler
{"title":"他们被咬了:关于机构和提供者背叛的报道,以及与埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征患者当前症状、未满足的需求和医疗期望的联系。","authors":"Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling,&nbsp;Chrystal L Lewis,&nbsp;Sean McCabe,&nbsp;Emma C Lathan,&nbsp;Gabrielle A Agnew,&nbsp;Candice N Selwyn,&nbsp;Margaret E Gigler","doi":"10.1177/26330040211022033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with rare and/or care-intensive conditions, such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS), can pose challenges to their healthcare providers (HCPs). The current study used the BITTEN framework<sup>1</sup> to code EDS patients' open-ended written responses to a needs survey to determine their self-reported prevalence of healthcare institutional betrayal and its link with their expressed symptoms, provider perceptions, unmet needs, and on-going healthcare-related expectations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with EDS (<i>n</i> = 234) were recruited <i>via</i> a rare disease electronic mailing list and snowball sampling. A total of one-hundred and six respondents (45.3%) endorsed having unmet healthcare-related needs; of these, 104 (99%) completed an open-ended prompt about these needs. Responses were coded for components of BITTEN, a framework designed to link patients' past, current, and future healthcare-related experiences in a trauma informed manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many respondents with ongoing needs endorsed experiencing past institutional and provider betrayal (43%; <i>n</i> = 45), current mental health symptoms (91.4%; <i>n</i> = 95), negative expectations for future healthcare (40.4%; <i>n</i> = 62), and a lack of trust in their healthcare provider (22.1%; <i>n</i> = 23). There were no significant differences in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)/anxiety, depression/sadness, or isolative symptoms between respondents coded for institutional betrayal (<i>n</i> = 45) compared with those not (<i>n</i> = 59). However, EDS respondents reporting institutional betrayal were significantly more likely to self-report anger and irritability symptoms, a lack of trust in their HCPs, and more negative expectations for future healthcare than those not reporting institutional betrayal.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>The frequent spontaneous reporting of past healthcare betrayals among patients with EDS implies the need for trauma-informed care and provider education. Given that experiences of institutional betrayal are associated with increased anger and irritability, as well as with negative expectations for future healthcare interactions, efforts to repair healthcare provider and system-wide relationship ruptures might have positive healthcare consequences.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><b>Reports of Institutional and Provider Betrayal and Links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Patients' Current Symptoms, Unmet Needs and Future Healthcare Expectations</b> <b>What is EDS?</b> Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) refers to a group of rare genetic connective tissue disorders that are primarily characterized by skin hyperelasticity, joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. Connective tissue is largely responsible for the structural integrity of our bodies, and there are several EDS subtypes which each describe a specific connective tissue problem. In addition, there is significant overlap between EDS types and other kinds of connective tissue disorders. As a result, recognizing, diagnosing, and treating EDS is often challenging. <b>What is Institutional betrayal?</b> Institutional Betrayal here refers to a harmful action (i.e. commission) or lack of action (i.e. omission) on the part of a healthcare institution, individual provider/healthcare team, or insurance company. When a patient trusts that the healthcare system will act in their best interest, and trust is violated, institutional betrayal occurs. <b>What is BITTEN?</b> BITTEN is an acronym for Betrayal, Indicator, Trauma symptoms, Trust, Expectations, and Needs. It is a framework meant to capture previous problematic healthcare-related experiences in EDS patients, then to consider how those experiences influence a patient's current symptoms, provider trust, future expectations in healthcare encounters, and on-going needs. <b>Why was this done?</b> EDS, like many rare diseases, is hard to recognize and manage. We aim to:Give voice to EDS patients and their common unmet needs and healthcare-related expectations.Highlight how healthcare providers can apply BITTEN to improve care practices in rare disease patient encounters. <b>What did we do?</b> Using a newly articulated applied model of healthcare, BITTEN, we analyzed the open-ended responses of EDS patients describing their unmet emotional and mental health needs. <b>What did we find?</b> Nearly half of EDS patients who indicated they had unmet needs reported experiencing institutional betrayal.EDS patients who reported institutional betrayal also expressed anger, a lack of trust in healthcare providers, negative expectations for future healthcare, and more unmet needs more frequently than EDS patients who did not report institutional betrayal. <b>What does this mean?</b> The EDS patients in this sample were not directly asked if they had experienced institutional betrayal, so the exact prevalence is not known. Furthermore, responses were obtained voluntarily <i>via</i> the internet, so caution should be taken when generalizing these findings.However, results indicate that too many patients with EDS have experienced healthcare betrayals; these experiences are associated with current anger and negative expectations for future healthcare interactions.The prevalence of past negative healthcare experiences, along with current unmet needs and future negative healthcare expectations in EDS patients who have experienced institutional betrayal, highlights the need for healthcare providers to tend to these experiences, mend patient-provider barriers, and provide higher quality healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":75218,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in rare disease","volume":"2 ","pages":"26330040211022033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/26330040211022033","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"They've been BITTEN: reports of institutional and provider betrayal and links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients' current symptoms, unmet needs and healthcare expectations.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling,&nbsp;Chrystal L Lewis,&nbsp;Sean McCabe,&nbsp;Emma C Lathan,&nbsp;Gabrielle A Agnew,&nbsp;Candice N Selwyn,&nbsp;Margaret E Gigler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26330040211022033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with rare and/or care-intensive conditions, such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS), can pose challenges to their healthcare providers (HCPs). The current study used the BITTEN framework<sup>1</sup> to code EDS patients' open-ended written responses to a needs survey to determine their self-reported prevalence of healthcare institutional betrayal and its link with their expressed symptoms, provider perceptions, unmet needs, and on-going healthcare-related expectations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with EDS (<i>n</i> = 234) were recruited <i>via</i> a rare disease electronic mailing list and snowball sampling. A total of one-hundred and six respondents (45.3%) endorsed having unmet healthcare-related needs; of these, 104 (99%) completed an open-ended prompt about these needs. Responses were coded for components of BITTEN, a framework designed to link patients' past, current, and future healthcare-related experiences in a trauma informed manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many respondents with ongoing needs endorsed experiencing past institutional and provider betrayal (43%; <i>n</i> = 45), current mental health symptoms (91.4%; <i>n</i> = 95), negative expectations for future healthcare (40.4%; <i>n</i> = 62), and a lack of trust in their healthcare provider (22.1%; <i>n</i> = 23). There were no significant differences in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)/anxiety, depression/sadness, or isolative symptoms between respondents coded for institutional betrayal (<i>n</i> = 45) compared with those not (<i>n</i> = 59). However, EDS respondents reporting institutional betrayal were significantly more likely to self-report anger and irritability symptoms, a lack of trust in their HCPs, and more negative expectations for future healthcare than those not reporting institutional betrayal.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>The frequent spontaneous reporting of past healthcare betrayals among patients with EDS implies the need for trauma-informed care and provider education. Given that experiences of institutional betrayal are associated with increased anger and irritability, as well as with negative expectations for future healthcare interactions, efforts to repair healthcare provider and system-wide relationship ruptures might have positive healthcare consequences.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><b>Reports of Institutional and Provider Betrayal and Links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Patients' Current Symptoms, Unmet Needs and Future Healthcare Expectations</b> <b>What is EDS?</b> Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) refers to a group of rare genetic connective tissue disorders that are primarily characterized by skin hyperelasticity, joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. Connective tissue is largely responsible for the structural integrity of our bodies, and there are several EDS subtypes which each describe a specific connective tissue problem. In addition, there is significant overlap between EDS types and other kinds of connective tissue disorders. As a result, recognizing, diagnosing, and treating EDS is often challenging. <b>What is Institutional betrayal?</b> Institutional Betrayal here refers to a harmful action (i.e. commission) or lack of action (i.e. omission) on the part of a healthcare institution, individual provider/healthcare team, or insurance company. When a patient trusts that the healthcare system will act in their best interest, and trust is violated, institutional betrayal occurs. <b>What is BITTEN?</b> BITTEN is an acronym for Betrayal, Indicator, Trauma symptoms, Trust, Expectations, and Needs. It is a framework meant to capture previous problematic healthcare-related experiences in EDS patients, then to consider how those experiences influence a patient's current symptoms, provider trust, future expectations in healthcare encounters, and on-going needs. <b>Why was this done?</b> EDS, like many rare diseases, is hard to recognize and manage. We aim to:Give voice to EDS patients and their common unmet needs and healthcare-related expectations.Highlight how healthcare providers can apply BITTEN to improve care practices in rare disease patient encounters. <b>What did we do?</b> Using a newly articulated applied model of healthcare, BITTEN, we analyzed the open-ended responses of EDS patients describing their unmet emotional and mental health needs. <b>What did we find?</b> Nearly half of EDS patients who indicated they had unmet needs reported experiencing institutional betrayal.EDS patients who reported institutional betrayal also expressed anger, a lack of trust in healthcare providers, negative expectations for future healthcare, and more unmet needs more frequently than EDS patients who did not report institutional betrayal. <b>What does this mean?</b> The EDS patients in this sample were not directly asked if they had experienced institutional betrayal, so the exact prevalence is not known. Furthermore, responses were obtained voluntarily <i>via</i> the internet, so caution should be taken when generalizing these findings.However, results indicate that too many patients with EDS have experienced healthcare betrayals; these experiences are associated with current anger and negative expectations for future healthcare interactions.The prevalence of past negative healthcare experiences, along with current unmet needs and future negative healthcare expectations in EDS patients who have experienced institutional betrayal, highlights the need for healthcare providers to tend to these experiences, mend patient-provider barriers, and provide higher quality healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic advances in rare disease\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"26330040211022033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/26330040211022033\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic advances in rare disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040211022033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in rare disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040211022033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

简介:患有罕见和/或重症监护疾病的患者,如埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征(EDS),可能会给他们的医疗保健提供者(HCP)带来挑战。目前的研究使用BITTEN框架1对EDS患者对需求调查的开放式书面回应进行编码,以确定他们自我报告的医疗机构背叛发生率及其与他们表达的症状、提供者感知、未满足的需求和持续的医疗相关期望的联系。方法:EDS患者(n = 234)通过罕见病电子邮件列表和滚雪球抽样进行招募。共有106名受访者(45.3%)支持未满足的医疗保健相关需求;其中,104人(99%)完成了关于这些需求的开放式提示。BITTEN是一个框架,旨在以创伤知情的方式将患者过去、当前和未来的医疗保健相关经历联系起来。结果:许多有持续需求的受访者表示,他们过去曾经历过机构和提供者的背叛(43%;n = 45),目前的心理健康症状(91.4%;n = 95),对未来医疗保健的负面预期(40.4%;n = 62),以及对其医疗保健提供者缺乏信任(22.1%;n = 23)。被编码为机构背叛的受访者在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)/焦虑、抑郁/悲伤或孤立症状方面没有显著差异(n = 45)与没有(n = 59)。然而,与未报告机构背叛的受访者相比,报告机构背叛行为的EDS受访者更有可能自我报告愤怒和易怒症状、对HCP缺乏信任以及对未来医疗保健的负面期望。讨论/结论:EDS患者经常自发报告过去的医疗背叛,这意味着需要创伤知情护理和提供者教育。鉴于机构背叛的经历与愤怒和易怒的增加以及对未来医疗保健互动的负面期望有关,修复医疗保健提供者和全系统关系破裂的努力可能会产生积极的医疗保健后果。简明总结:机构和提供者背叛报告以及与埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征患者当前症状、未满足需求和未来医疗期望的联系EDS是什么?埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征(EDS)是指一组罕见的遗传性结缔组织疾病,其主要特征是皮肤超弹性、关节过度活动和组织脆性。结缔组织在很大程度上负责我们身体的结构完整性,有几种EDS亚型,每种亚型都描述了特定的结缔组织问题。此外,EDS类型与其他类型的结缔组织疾病之间存在显著重叠。因此,识别、诊断和治疗EDS往往具有挑战性。什么是制度背叛?这里的机构背叛是指医疗机构、个人提供者/医疗团队或保险公司的有害行为(即佣金)或缺乏行为(即疏忽)。当患者相信医疗系统会以他们的最大利益行事,而这种信任遭到侵犯时,就会发生制度背叛。什么是BITTEN?BITTEN是背叛、指标、创伤症状、信任、期望和需求的缩写。这是一个框架,旨在捕捉EDS患者以前有问题的医疗保健相关经历,然后考虑这些经历如何影响患者当前的症状、提供者的信任、未来对医疗保健的期望以及持续的需求。为什么要这样做?EDS和许多罕见病一样,很难识别和管理。我们的目标是:为EDS患者及其常见的未满足需求和医疗保健相关期望发声。强调医疗保健提供者如何应用BITTEN来改善罕见病患者的护理实践。我们做了什么?使用一个新的阐明的医疗保健应用模型BITTEN,我们分析了EDS患者描述其未满足的情绪和心理健康需求的开放式反应。我们发现了什么?近一半的EDS患者表示他们有未满足的需求,他们报告称经历了机构背叛。与未报告机构背叛的EDS患者相比,报告机构背叛行为的EDS患者也更频繁地表达了愤怒、对医疗保健提供者缺乏信任、对未来医疗保健的负面期望以及更多未满足的需求。这是什么意思?该样本中的EDS患者没有直接被问及他们是否经历过机构背叛,因此确切的患病率尚不清楚。此外,回复是通过互联网自愿获得的,因此在概括这些发现时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

They've been BITTEN: reports of institutional and provider betrayal and links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients' current symptoms, unmet needs and healthcare expectations.

They've been BITTEN: reports of institutional and provider betrayal and links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients' current symptoms, unmet needs and healthcare expectations.

They've been BITTEN: reports of institutional and provider betrayal and links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients' current symptoms, unmet needs and healthcare expectations.

They've been BITTEN: reports of institutional and provider betrayal and links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients' current symptoms, unmet needs and healthcare expectations.

Introduction: Patients with rare and/or care-intensive conditions, such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS), can pose challenges to their healthcare providers (HCPs). The current study used the BITTEN framework1 to code EDS patients' open-ended written responses to a needs survey to determine their self-reported prevalence of healthcare institutional betrayal and its link with their expressed symptoms, provider perceptions, unmet needs, and on-going healthcare-related expectations.

Methods: Patients with EDS (n = 234) were recruited via a rare disease electronic mailing list and snowball sampling. A total of one-hundred and six respondents (45.3%) endorsed having unmet healthcare-related needs; of these, 104 (99%) completed an open-ended prompt about these needs. Responses were coded for components of BITTEN, a framework designed to link patients' past, current, and future healthcare-related experiences in a trauma informed manner.

Results: Many respondents with ongoing needs endorsed experiencing past institutional and provider betrayal (43%; n = 45), current mental health symptoms (91.4%; n = 95), negative expectations for future healthcare (40.4%; n = 62), and a lack of trust in their healthcare provider (22.1%; n = 23). There were no significant differences in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)/anxiety, depression/sadness, or isolative symptoms between respondents coded for institutional betrayal (n = 45) compared with those not (n = 59). However, EDS respondents reporting institutional betrayal were significantly more likely to self-report anger and irritability symptoms, a lack of trust in their HCPs, and more negative expectations for future healthcare than those not reporting institutional betrayal.

Discussion/conclusions: The frequent spontaneous reporting of past healthcare betrayals among patients with EDS implies the need for trauma-informed care and provider education. Given that experiences of institutional betrayal are associated with increased anger and irritability, as well as with negative expectations for future healthcare interactions, efforts to repair healthcare provider and system-wide relationship ruptures might have positive healthcare consequences.

Plain language summary: Reports of Institutional and Provider Betrayal and Links with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Patients' Current Symptoms, Unmet Needs and Future Healthcare Expectations What is EDS? Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) refers to a group of rare genetic connective tissue disorders that are primarily characterized by skin hyperelasticity, joint hypermobility, and tissue fragility. Connective tissue is largely responsible for the structural integrity of our bodies, and there are several EDS subtypes which each describe a specific connective tissue problem. In addition, there is significant overlap between EDS types and other kinds of connective tissue disorders. As a result, recognizing, diagnosing, and treating EDS is often challenging. What is Institutional betrayal? Institutional Betrayal here refers to a harmful action (i.e. commission) or lack of action (i.e. omission) on the part of a healthcare institution, individual provider/healthcare team, or insurance company. When a patient trusts that the healthcare system will act in their best interest, and trust is violated, institutional betrayal occurs. What is BITTEN? BITTEN is an acronym for Betrayal, Indicator, Trauma symptoms, Trust, Expectations, and Needs. It is a framework meant to capture previous problematic healthcare-related experiences in EDS patients, then to consider how those experiences influence a patient's current symptoms, provider trust, future expectations in healthcare encounters, and on-going needs. Why was this done? EDS, like many rare diseases, is hard to recognize and manage. We aim to:Give voice to EDS patients and their common unmet needs and healthcare-related expectations.Highlight how healthcare providers can apply BITTEN to improve care practices in rare disease patient encounters. What did we do? Using a newly articulated applied model of healthcare, BITTEN, we analyzed the open-ended responses of EDS patients describing their unmet emotional and mental health needs. What did we find? Nearly half of EDS patients who indicated they had unmet needs reported experiencing institutional betrayal.EDS patients who reported institutional betrayal also expressed anger, a lack of trust in healthcare providers, negative expectations for future healthcare, and more unmet needs more frequently than EDS patients who did not report institutional betrayal. What does this mean? The EDS patients in this sample were not directly asked if they had experienced institutional betrayal, so the exact prevalence is not known. Furthermore, responses were obtained voluntarily via the internet, so caution should be taken when generalizing these findings.However, results indicate that too many patients with EDS have experienced healthcare betrayals; these experiences are associated with current anger and negative expectations for future healthcare interactions.The prevalence of past negative healthcare experiences, along with current unmet needs and future negative healthcare expectations in EDS patients who have experienced institutional betrayal, highlights the need for healthcare providers to tend to these experiences, mend patient-provider barriers, and provide higher quality healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信