带摘要反馈的远程同步撕裂伤修复指令。

Stephen K Stacey, Christopher L Boswell, Karen K Cowan, Anthony J Furlano, Mark D McEleney, Erin F Morcomb, Christopher J Tookey
{"title":"带摘要反馈的远程同步撕裂伤修复指令。","authors":"Stephen K Stacey,&nbsp;Christopher L Boswell,&nbsp;Karen K Cowan,&nbsp;Anthony J Furlano,&nbsp;Mark D McEleney,&nbsp;Erin F Morcomb,&nbsp;Christopher J Tookey","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.863182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Social distancing and quarantine requirements imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote training in many learning situations that formerly focused on traditional in-person training. In this context, we developed an adaptive approach to teaching laceration repair remotely while allowing for synchronous instruction and feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In April 2020, 35 family medicine residents from 4 programs in the Midwest United States participated in a real-time, remotely-delivered, 2-hour virtual procedure workshop of instruction in suture techniques for laceration repair. Paired-sample <i>t</i> tests compared scores of learner self-confidence obtained during pre- and posttests. We interpreted short-answer responses with a mixed-methods analysis. Residents submitted photos and videos of suture techniques and received formative feedback based on a predefined rubric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All residents completed the pre- and posttests. The posttest scores for self-confidence across the participants showed significant improvement for all suture techniques. Of the 67 short-answer responses, 38 responses (56.7%) were positive; 9 (13.4%) negative; 8 (11.9%) neutral; and 12 (17.9%) a combination of positive and negative. The workshop was rated by 34 residents (97.1%) as either \"about the same as prior training experiences,\" \"better than prior training experiences,\" or \"much better than prior training experiences.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Learners reported that a remotely-delivered, real-time, synchronous suture technique workshop was a valuable experience. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of this platform to promote procedural competence.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351430/pdf/primer-7-19.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Synchronous Laceration Repair Instruction With Summary Feedback.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen K Stacey,&nbsp;Christopher L Boswell,&nbsp;Karen K Cowan,&nbsp;Anthony J Furlano,&nbsp;Mark D McEleney,&nbsp;Erin F Morcomb,&nbsp;Christopher J Tookey\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2023.863182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Social distancing and quarantine requirements imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote training in many learning situations that formerly focused on traditional in-person training. In this context, we developed an adaptive approach to teaching laceration repair remotely while allowing for synchronous instruction and feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In April 2020, 35 family medicine residents from 4 programs in the Midwest United States participated in a real-time, remotely-delivered, 2-hour virtual procedure workshop of instruction in suture techniques for laceration repair. Paired-sample <i>t</i> tests compared scores of learner self-confidence obtained during pre- and posttests. We interpreted short-answer responses with a mixed-methods analysis. Residents submitted photos and videos of suture techniques and received formative feedback based on a predefined rubric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All residents completed the pre- and posttests. The posttest scores for self-confidence across the participants showed significant improvement for all suture techniques. Of the 67 short-answer responses, 38 responses (56.7%) were positive; 9 (13.4%) negative; 8 (11.9%) neutral; and 12 (17.9%) a combination of positive and negative. The workshop was rated by 34 residents (97.1%) as either \\\"about the same as prior training experiences,\\\" \\\"better than prior training experiences,\\\" or \\\"much better than prior training experiences.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Learners reported that a remotely-delivered, real-time, synchronous suture technique workshop was a valuable experience. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of this platform to promote procedural competence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351430/pdf/primer-7-19.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.863182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2023.863182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间实施的社会距离和隔离要求,需要在许多学习情况下进行远程培训,而以前的培训主要集中在传统的现场培训上。在这种情况下,我们开发了一种自适应的方法来远程教授撕裂伤修复,同时允许同步教学和反馈。方法:2020年4月,来自美国中西部4个项目的35名家庭医学住院医师参加了一个实时、远程授课、2小时的撕裂伤修复缝合技术虚拟手术研讨会。配对样本t检验比较了前测和后测期间学习者自信心的得分。我们用混合方法分析来解释简短的回答。住院医生提交了缝合技术的照片和视频,并根据预先定义的标题收到了形成性的反馈。结果:所有住院医师均完成了前、后测试。所有缝合技术的参与者的自信心测试后得分均有显著提高。在67个简答题中,38个是肯定的,占56.7%;阴性9例(13.4%);8人(11.9%)中性;12个(17.9%)是正负结合。34名住院医师(97.1%)对工作坊的评价为“与之前的培训经验大致相同”、“比之前的培训经验好”或“比之前的培训经验好得多”。结论:学员报告远程、实时、同步缝合技术研讨会是一次宝贵的经验。该平台在提高程序能力方面的有效性有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remote Synchronous Laceration Repair Instruction With Summary Feedback.

Background and objectives: Social distancing and quarantine requirements imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote training in many learning situations that formerly focused on traditional in-person training. In this context, we developed an adaptive approach to teaching laceration repair remotely while allowing for synchronous instruction and feedback.

Methods: In April 2020, 35 family medicine residents from 4 programs in the Midwest United States participated in a real-time, remotely-delivered, 2-hour virtual procedure workshop of instruction in suture techniques for laceration repair. Paired-sample t tests compared scores of learner self-confidence obtained during pre- and posttests. We interpreted short-answer responses with a mixed-methods analysis. Residents submitted photos and videos of suture techniques and received formative feedback based on a predefined rubric.

Results: All residents completed the pre- and posttests. The posttest scores for self-confidence across the participants showed significant improvement for all suture techniques. Of the 67 short-answer responses, 38 responses (56.7%) were positive; 9 (13.4%) negative; 8 (11.9%) neutral; and 12 (17.9%) a combination of positive and negative. The workshop was rated by 34 residents (97.1%) as either "about the same as prior training experiences," "better than prior training experiences," or "much better than prior training experiences."

Conclusion: Learners reported that a remotely-delivered, real-time, synchronous suture technique workshop was a valuable experience. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of this platform to promote procedural competence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信