耐多药结肠炎患者大腿中部出口部位静脉导管的安全性。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1177/11297298231188150
Arianna Bartoli, Mattia Donadoni, Massimiliano Quici, Giulia Rizzi, Leyla La Cava, Antonella Foschi, Maria Calloni, Francesco Casella, Elena Martini, Alba Taino, Chiara Cogliati, Antonio Gidaro
{"title":"耐多药结肠炎患者大腿中部出口部位静脉导管的安全性。","authors":"Arianna Bartoli, Mattia Donadoni, Massimiliano Quici, Giulia Rizzi, Leyla La Cava, Antonella Foschi, Maria Calloni, Francesco Casella, Elena Martini, Alba Taino, Chiara Cogliati, Antonio Gidaro","doi":"10.1177/11297298231188150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Venous catheters inserted in superficial femoral vein and with mid-thigh exit site have emerged as a feasible and safe technique for central or peripheral tip's venous access, especially in agitated, delirious patients. The spread of multidrug-resistant bacterial (MDR) strains is an emerging clinical problem and more and more patients are being colonized by these types of bacteria. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) or catheter related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in mid-thigh catheters in patients with positive rectal swabs to evaluate the safety of this procedure and the real infection risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data on patients with mid-tight catheters inserted from May 2021 to November 2022. All surveillance rectal swabs were recorded. In addition, to collect data on CLABSI and CRBSI, the results of all blood and catheter tip cultures performed during the hospital stay were acquired.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred two patients were enrolled, 304 patients (50.5%) had a rectal swab; 128 (42.1%) swabs were positive for MDR. Nine CLABSI (only two in patients with a positive rectal swab) and three CRBSI were detected. No statistical difference in the absolute number of CLABSI and CRBSI and in the number of infections per 1000 catheter days emerged between the overall population and patients with positive rectal swabs (respectively <i>p</i> = 0.45 and <i>p</i> = 0.53). Similarly, no statistical difference in the number of CLABSI and CRBSI was found among patients with a negative swab and patients with a positive one (respectively <i>p</i> = 0.43 and <i>p</i> = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our data, cannulation of the superficial femoral vein represents a safe location in patients with positive rectal swabs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of mid-thigh exit site venous catheters in multidrug resistant colonized patients.\",\"authors\":\"Arianna Bartoli, Mattia Donadoni, Massimiliano Quici, Giulia Rizzi, Leyla La Cava, Antonella Foschi, Maria Calloni, Francesco Casella, Elena Martini, Alba Taino, Chiara Cogliati, Antonio Gidaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298231188150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Venous catheters inserted in superficial femoral vein and with mid-thigh exit site have emerged as a feasible and safe technique for central or peripheral tip's venous access, especially in agitated, delirious patients. The spread of multidrug-resistant bacterial (MDR) strains is an emerging clinical problem and more and more patients are being colonized by these types of bacteria. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) or catheter related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in mid-thigh catheters in patients with positive rectal swabs to evaluate the safety of this procedure and the real infection risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data on patients with mid-tight catheters inserted from May 2021 to November 2022. All surveillance rectal swabs were recorded. In addition, to collect data on CLABSI and CRBSI, the results of all blood and catheter tip cultures performed during the hospital stay were acquired.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred two patients were enrolled, 304 patients (50.5%) had a rectal swab; 128 (42.1%) swabs were positive for MDR. Nine CLABSI (only two in patients with a positive rectal swab) and three CRBSI were detected. No statistical difference in the absolute number of CLABSI and CRBSI and in the number of infections per 1000 catheter days emerged between the overall population and patients with positive rectal swabs (respectively <i>p</i> = 0.45 and <i>p</i> = 0.53). Similarly, no statistical difference in the number of CLABSI and CRBSI was found among patients with a negative swab and patients with a positive one (respectively <i>p</i> = 0.43 and <i>p</i> = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our data, cannulation of the superficial femoral vein represents a safe location in patients with positive rectal swabs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231188150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231188150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:将静脉导管插入股浅静脉和大腿中段出口部位,已成为一种可行且安全的中心静脉或外周尖端静脉通路技术,尤其适用于躁动不安、神志不清的患者。耐多药细菌(MDR)菌株的传播是一个新出现的临床问题,越来越多的患者被这类细菌感染。本研究旨在评估直肠拭子阳性患者大腿中段导管中心管相关血流感染(CLABSI)或导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)的发生率,以评估该手术的安全性和真正的感染风险:在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们分析了 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 11 月期间插入中密导管患者的数据。所有监测直肠拭子均被记录在案。此外,为了收集 CLABSI 和 CRBSI 数据,我们还收集了住院期间所有血液和导管尖端培养的结果:共登记了 62 名患者,其中 304 名患者(50.5%)接受了直肠拭子检查;128 名患者(42.1%)的直肠拭子呈 MDR 阳性。共发现 9 例 CLABSI(仅 2 例直肠拭子阳性患者)和 3 例 CRBSI。在 CLABSI 和 CRBSI 的绝对数量上,以及在每 1000 个导管日的感染数量上,总体人群与直肠拭子阳性患者之间没有统计学差异(分别为 p = 0.45 和 p = 0.53)。同样,直肠拭子阴性的患者与直肠拭子阳性的患者在 CLABSI 和 CRBSI 的数量上也没有统计学差异(分别为 p = 0.43 和 p = 0.51):根据我们的数据,在直肠拭子呈阳性的患者中,股浅静脉插管是一个安全的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of mid-thigh exit site venous catheters in multidrug resistant colonized patients.

Introduction: Venous catheters inserted in superficial femoral vein and with mid-thigh exit site have emerged as a feasible and safe technique for central or peripheral tip's venous access, especially in agitated, delirious patients. The spread of multidrug-resistant bacterial (MDR) strains is an emerging clinical problem and more and more patients are being colonized by these types of bacteria. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) or catheter related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in mid-thigh catheters in patients with positive rectal swabs to evaluate the safety of this procedure and the real infection risk.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data on patients with mid-tight catheters inserted from May 2021 to November 2022. All surveillance rectal swabs were recorded. In addition, to collect data on CLABSI and CRBSI, the results of all blood and catheter tip cultures performed during the hospital stay were acquired.

Results: Six hundred two patients were enrolled, 304 patients (50.5%) had a rectal swab; 128 (42.1%) swabs were positive for MDR. Nine CLABSI (only two in patients with a positive rectal swab) and three CRBSI were detected. No statistical difference in the absolute number of CLABSI and CRBSI and in the number of infections per 1000 catheter days emerged between the overall population and patients with positive rectal swabs (respectively p = 0.45 and p = 0.53). Similarly, no statistical difference in the number of CLABSI and CRBSI was found among patients with a negative swab and patients with a positive one (respectively p = 0.43 and p = 0.51).

Conclusions: According to our data, cannulation of the superficial femoral vein represents a safe location in patients with positive rectal swabs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信