极低出生体重婴儿死亡风险的基于学习的纵向预测模型:一项全国性队列研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1159/000530738
Jae Yoon Na, Donggoo Jung, Jong Ho Cha, Daehyun Kim, Joonhyuk Son, Jae Kyoon Hwang, Tae Hyun Kim, Hyun-Kyung Park
{"title":"极低出生体重婴儿死亡风险的基于学习的纵向预测模型:一项全国性队列研究。","authors":"Jae Yoon Na,&nbsp;Donggoo Jung,&nbsp;Jong Ho Cha,&nbsp;Daehyun Kim,&nbsp;Joonhyuk Son,&nbsp;Jae Kyoon Hwang,&nbsp;Tae Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Hyun-Kyung Park","doi":"10.1159/000530738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prediction models assessing the mortality of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants were confined to models using only pre- and perinatal variables. We aimed to construct a prediction model comprising multifactorial clinical events with data obtainable at various time points.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 15,790 (including 2,045 in-hospital deaths) VLBW infants born between 2013 and 2020 who were enrolled in the Korean Neonatal Network, a nationwide registry. In total, 53 prenatal and postnatal variables were sequentially added into the three discrete models stratified by hospital days: (1) within 24 h (TL-1d), (2) from day 2 to day 7 after birth (TL-7d), (3) from day 8 after birth to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (TL-dc). Each model predicted the mortality of VLBW infants within the affected period. Multilayer perception (MLP)-based network analysis was used for modeling, and ensemble analysis with traditional machine learning (ML) analysis was additionally applied. The performance of models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values. The Shapley method was applied to reveal the contribution of each variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the in-hospital mortality was 13.0% (1.2% in TL-1d, 4.1% in TL-7d, and 7.7% in TL-dc). Our MLP-based mortality prediction model combined with ML ensemble analysis had AUROC values of 0.932 (TL-1d), 0.973 (TL-7d), and 0.950 (TL-dc), respectively, outperforming traditional ML analysis in each timeline. Birth weight and gestational age were constant and significant risk factors, whereas the impact of the other variables varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the study suggest that our MLP-based models could be applied in predicting in-hospital mortality for high-risk VLBW infants. We highlight that mortality prediction should be customized according to the timing of occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"652-660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning-Based Longitudinal Prediction Models for Mortality Risk in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Nationwide Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Yoon Na,&nbsp;Donggoo Jung,&nbsp;Jong Ho Cha,&nbsp;Daehyun Kim,&nbsp;Joonhyuk Son,&nbsp;Jae Kyoon Hwang,&nbsp;Tae Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Hyun-Kyung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000530738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prediction models assessing the mortality of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants were confined to models using only pre- and perinatal variables. We aimed to construct a prediction model comprising multifactorial clinical events with data obtainable at various time points.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 15,790 (including 2,045 in-hospital deaths) VLBW infants born between 2013 and 2020 who were enrolled in the Korean Neonatal Network, a nationwide registry. In total, 53 prenatal and postnatal variables were sequentially added into the three discrete models stratified by hospital days: (1) within 24 h (TL-1d), (2) from day 2 to day 7 after birth (TL-7d), (3) from day 8 after birth to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (TL-dc). Each model predicted the mortality of VLBW infants within the affected period. Multilayer perception (MLP)-based network analysis was used for modeling, and ensemble analysis with traditional machine learning (ML) analysis was additionally applied. The performance of models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values. The Shapley method was applied to reveal the contribution of each variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the in-hospital mortality was 13.0% (1.2% in TL-1d, 4.1% in TL-7d, and 7.7% in TL-dc). Our MLP-based mortality prediction model combined with ML ensemble analysis had AUROC values of 0.932 (TL-1d), 0.973 (TL-7d), and 0.950 (TL-dc), respectively, outperforming traditional ML analysis in each timeline. Birth weight and gestational age were constant and significant risk factors, whereas the impact of the other variables varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the study suggest that our MLP-based models could be applied in predicting in-hospital mortality for high-risk VLBW infants. We highlight that mortality prediction should be customized according to the timing of occurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neonatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"652-660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530738\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:评估极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿死亡率的预测模型仅限于使用产前和围产期变量的模型。我们旨在构建一个包括多因素临床事件的预测模型,该模型具有在不同时间点可获得的数据。方法:我们纳入了15790名2013年至2020年间出生的极低出生体重儿(包括2045例住院死亡),他们被纳入了韩国新生儿网络,这是一个全国性的登记机构。总共有53个产前和产后变量被依次添加到按住院天数分层的三个离散模型中:(1)24小时内(TL-1d),(2)出生后第2天至第7天(TL-7d),以及(3)出生后8天至新生儿重症监护室出院(TL-dc)。每个模型都预测了极低出生体重婴儿在受影响时期的死亡率。使用基于多层感知(MLP)的网络分析进行建模,并额外应用了与传统机器学习(ML)分析的集成分析。使用受试者工作特性曲线下面积(AUROC)值比较模型的性能。应用Shapley方法来揭示每个变量的贡献。结果:总的来说,住院死亡率为13.0%(TL-1d为1.2%,TL-7d为4.1%,TL-dc为7.7%)。我们基于MLP的死亡率预测模型与ML集合分析相结合,AUROC值分别为0.932(TL-1d)、0.973(TL-7d)和0.950(TL-dc),在每个时间轴上都优于传统的ML分析。出生体重和胎龄是不变的重要风险因素,而其他变量的影响各不相同。结论:研究结果表明,我们基于MLP的模型可用于预测高危极低出生体重儿的住院死亡率。我们强调,死亡率预测应根据发生的时间进行定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning-Based Longitudinal Prediction Models for Mortality Risk in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Introduction: Prediction models assessing the mortality of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants were confined to models using only pre- and perinatal variables. We aimed to construct a prediction model comprising multifactorial clinical events with data obtainable at various time points.

Methods: We included 15,790 (including 2,045 in-hospital deaths) VLBW infants born between 2013 and 2020 who were enrolled in the Korean Neonatal Network, a nationwide registry. In total, 53 prenatal and postnatal variables were sequentially added into the three discrete models stratified by hospital days: (1) within 24 h (TL-1d), (2) from day 2 to day 7 after birth (TL-7d), (3) from day 8 after birth to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (TL-dc). Each model predicted the mortality of VLBW infants within the affected period. Multilayer perception (MLP)-based network analysis was used for modeling, and ensemble analysis with traditional machine learning (ML) analysis was additionally applied. The performance of models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values. The Shapley method was applied to reveal the contribution of each variable.

Results: Overall, the in-hospital mortality was 13.0% (1.2% in TL-1d, 4.1% in TL-7d, and 7.7% in TL-dc). Our MLP-based mortality prediction model combined with ML ensemble analysis had AUROC values of 0.932 (TL-1d), 0.973 (TL-7d), and 0.950 (TL-dc), respectively, outperforming traditional ML analysis in each timeline. Birth weight and gestational age were constant and significant risk factors, whereas the impact of the other variables varied.

Conclusion: The findings of the study suggest that our MLP-based models could be applied in predicting in-hospital mortality for high-risk VLBW infants. We highlight that mortality prediction should be customized according to the timing of occurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neonatology
Neonatology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信