综合评估框架在COVID-19研究中的应用:人工智能在医疗保健中的转化方面的系统综述

JMIR AI Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2196/42313
Aaron Edward Casey, Saba Ansari, Bahareh Nakisa, Blair Kelly, Pieta Brown, Paul Cooper, Imran Muhammad, Steven Livingstone, Sandeep Reddy, Ville-Petteri Makinen
{"title":"综合评估框架在COVID-19研究中的应用:人工智能在医疗保健中的转化方面的系统综述","authors":"Aaron Edward Casey,&nbsp;Saba Ansari,&nbsp;Bahareh Nakisa,&nbsp;Blair Kelly,&nbsp;Pieta Brown,&nbsp;Paul Cooper,&nbsp;Imran Muhammad,&nbsp;Steven Livingstone,&nbsp;Sandeep Reddy,&nbsp;Ville-Petteri Makinen","doi":"10.2196/42313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite immense progress in artificial intelligence (AI) models, there has been limited deployment in health care environments. The gap between potential and actual AI applications is likely due to the lack of translatability between controlled research environments (where these models are developed) and clinical environments for which the AI tools are ultimately intended.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We previously developed the Translational Evaluation of Healthcare AI (TEHAI) framework to assess the translational value of AI models and to support successful transition to health care environments. In this study, we applied the TEHAI framework to the COVID-19 literature in order to assess how well translational topics are covered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search for COVID-19 AI studies published between December 2019 and December 2020 resulted in 3830 records. A subset of 102 (2.7%) papers that passed the inclusion criteria was sampled for full review. The papers were assessed for translational value and descriptive data collected by 9 reviewers (each study was assessed by 2 reviewers). Evaluation scores and extracted data were compared by a third reviewer for resolution of discrepancies. The review process was conducted on the Covidence software platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a significant trend for studies to attain high scores for technical capability but low scores for the areas essential for clinical translatability. Specific questions regarding external model validation, safety, nonmaleficence, and service adoption received failed scores in most studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using TEHAI, we identified notable gaps in how well translational topics of AI models are covered in the COVID-19 clinical sphere. These gaps in areas crucial for clinical translatability could, and should, be considered already at the model development stage to increase translatability into real COVID-19 health care environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":73551,"journal":{"name":"JMIR AI","volume":"2 ","pages":"e42313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337329/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of a Comprehensive Evaluation Framework to COVID-19 Studies: Systematic Review of Translational Aspects of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Edward Casey,&nbsp;Saba Ansari,&nbsp;Bahareh Nakisa,&nbsp;Blair Kelly,&nbsp;Pieta Brown,&nbsp;Paul Cooper,&nbsp;Imran Muhammad,&nbsp;Steven Livingstone,&nbsp;Sandeep Reddy,&nbsp;Ville-Petteri Makinen\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/42313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite immense progress in artificial intelligence (AI) models, there has been limited deployment in health care environments. The gap between potential and actual AI applications is likely due to the lack of translatability between controlled research environments (where these models are developed) and clinical environments for which the AI tools are ultimately intended.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We previously developed the Translational Evaluation of Healthcare AI (TEHAI) framework to assess the translational value of AI models and to support successful transition to health care environments. In this study, we applied the TEHAI framework to the COVID-19 literature in order to assess how well translational topics are covered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search for COVID-19 AI studies published between December 2019 and December 2020 resulted in 3830 records. A subset of 102 (2.7%) papers that passed the inclusion criteria was sampled for full review. The papers were assessed for translational value and descriptive data collected by 9 reviewers (each study was assessed by 2 reviewers). Evaluation scores and extracted data were compared by a third reviewer for resolution of discrepancies. The review process was conducted on the Covidence software platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a significant trend for studies to attain high scores for technical capability but low scores for the areas essential for clinical translatability. Specific questions regarding external model validation, safety, nonmaleficence, and service adoption received failed scores in most studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using TEHAI, we identified notable gaps in how well translational topics of AI models are covered in the COVID-19 clinical sphere. These gaps in areas crucial for clinical translatability could, and should, be considered already at the model development stage to increase translatability into real COVID-19 health care environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR AI\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"e42313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR AI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/42313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/42313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:尽管人工智能(AI)模型取得了巨大进展,但在卫生保健环境中的部署有限。潜在和实际人工智能应用之间的差距可能是由于人工智能工具最终用于的受控研究环境(开发这些模型的地方)和临床环境之间缺乏可翻译性。目的:我们之前开发了医疗人工智能的转化评估(TEHAI)框架,以评估人工智能模型的转化价值,并支持成功过渡到医疗保健环境。在本研究中,我们将TEHAI框架应用于COVID-19文献,以评估翻译主题的覆盖程度。方法:系统检索2019年12月至2020年12月发表的COVID-19 AI研究,共3830条记录。通过纳入标准的102篇(2.7%)论文被抽样进行全面审查。9名审稿人评估了这些论文的翻译价值和收集的描述性数据(每项研究由2名审稿人评估)。评估分数和提取的数据由第三位审稿人进行比较,以解决差异。审查过程在冠状病毒软件平台上进行。结果:我们观察到一个显著的趋势,研究在技术能力方面获得高分,但在临床可翻译性的关键领域获得低分。在大多数研究中,关于外部模型验证、安全性、非恶意性和服务采用的特定问题得分不合格。结论:使用TEHAI,我们发现人工智能模型的翻译主题在COVID-19临床领域的覆盖程度存在显著差距。在对临床可转译性至关重要的领域,这些差距可以而且应该在模型开发阶段就得到考虑,以提高对实际COVID-19卫生保健环境的可转译性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Application of a Comprehensive Evaluation Framework to COVID-19 Studies: Systematic Review of Translational Aspects of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.

Application of a Comprehensive Evaluation Framework to COVID-19 Studies: Systematic Review of Translational Aspects of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.

Application of a Comprehensive Evaluation Framework to COVID-19 Studies: Systematic Review of Translational Aspects of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.

Application of a Comprehensive Evaluation Framework to COVID-19 Studies: Systematic Review of Translational Aspects of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.

Background: Despite immense progress in artificial intelligence (AI) models, there has been limited deployment in health care environments. The gap between potential and actual AI applications is likely due to the lack of translatability between controlled research environments (where these models are developed) and clinical environments for which the AI tools are ultimately intended.

Objective: We previously developed the Translational Evaluation of Healthcare AI (TEHAI) framework to assess the translational value of AI models and to support successful transition to health care environments. In this study, we applied the TEHAI framework to the COVID-19 literature in order to assess how well translational topics are covered.

Methods: A systematic literature search for COVID-19 AI studies published between December 2019 and December 2020 resulted in 3830 records. A subset of 102 (2.7%) papers that passed the inclusion criteria was sampled for full review. The papers were assessed for translational value and descriptive data collected by 9 reviewers (each study was assessed by 2 reviewers). Evaluation scores and extracted data were compared by a third reviewer for resolution of discrepancies. The review process was conducted on the Covidence software platform.

Results: We observed a significant trend for studies to attain high scores for technical capability but low scores for the areas essential for clinical translatability. Specific questions regarding external model validation, safety, nonmaleficence, and service adoption received failed scores in most studies.

Conclusions: Using TEHAI, we identified notable gaps in how well translational topics of AI models are covered in the COVID-19 clinical sphere. These gaps in areas crucial for clinical translatability could, and should, be considered already at the model development stage to increase translatability into real COVID-19 health care environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信