癫痫状态反复发作患者的临床特征和预后。

Kristina Bauer, Felix Rosenow, Susanne Knake, Laurent M Willems, Leena Kämppi, Adam Strzelczyk
{"title":"癫痫状态反复发作患者的临床特征和预后。","authors":"Kristina Bauer, Felix Rosenow, Susanne Knake, Laurent M Willems, Leena Kämppi, Adam Strzelczyk","doi":"10.1186/s42466-023-00261-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple studies have focused on medical and pharmacological treatments and outcome predictors of patients with status epilepticus (SE). However, a sufficient understanding of recurrent episodes of SE is lacking. Therefore, we reviewed recurrent SE episodes to investigate their clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with relapses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, multicenter study, we reviewed recurrent SE patient data covering 2011 to 2017 from the university hospitals of Frankfurt and Marburg, Germany. Clinical characteristics and outcome variables were compared among the first and subsequent SE episodes using a standardized form for data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 120 recurrent SE episodes in 80 patients (10.2% of all 1177 episodes). The mean age at the first SE episode was 62.2 years (median 66.5; SD 19.3; range 21-91), and 42 of these patients were male (52.5%). A mean of 262.4 days passed between the first and the second episode. Tonic-clonic seizure semiology and a cerebrovascular disease etiology were predominant in initial and recurrent episodes. After subsequent episodes, patients showed increased disability as indicated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and 9 out of 80 patients died during the second episode (11.3%). Increases in refractory and super-refractory SE (RSE and SRSE, respectively) were noted during the second episode, and the occurrence of a non-refractory SE (NRSE) during the first SE episode did not necessarily provide a protective marker for subsequent non-refractory episodes. An increase in the use of intravenous-available anti-seizure medication (ASM) was observed in the treatment of SE patients. Patients were discharged from hospital with a mean of 2.8 ± 1.0 ASMs after the second SE episode and 2.1 ± 1.2 ASMs after the first episode. Levetiracetam was the most common ASM used before admission and on discharge for SE patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study used the mRS to demonstrate worsened outcomes of patients at consecutive SE episodes. ASM accumulations after subsequent SE episodes were registered over the study period. The study results underline the necessity for improved clinical follow-ups and outpatient care to reduce the health care burden from recurrent SE episodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19169,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research and Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent status epilepticus episodes.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Bauer, Felix Rosenow, Susanne Knake, Laurent M Willems, Leena Kämppi, Adam Strzelczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42466-023-00261-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple studies have focused on medical and pharmacological treatments and outcome predictors of patients with status epilepticus (SE). However, a sufficient understanding of recurrent episodes of SE is lacking. Therefore, we reviewed recurrent SE episodes to investigate their clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with relapses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, multicenter study, we reviewed recurrent SE patient data covering 2011 to 2017 from the university hospitals of Frankfurt and Marburg, Germany. Clinical characteristics and outcome variables were compared among the first and subsequent SE episodes using a standardized form for data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 120 recurrent SE episodes in 80 patients (10.2% of all 1177 episodes). The mean age at the first SE episode was 62.2 years (median 66.5; SD 19.3; range 21-91), and 42 of these patients were male (52.5%). A mean of 262.4 days passed between the first and the second episode. Tonic-clonic seizure semiology and a cerebrovascular disease etiology were predominant in initial and recurrent episodes. After subsequent episodes, patients showed increased disability as indicated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and 9 out of 80 patients died during the second episode (11.3%). Increases in refractory and super-refractory SE (RSE and SRSE, respectively) were noted during the second episode, and the occurrence of a non-refractory SE (NRSE) during the first SE episode did not necessarily provide a protective marker for subsequent non-refractory episodes. An increase in the use of intravenous-available anti-seizure medication (ASM) was observed in the treatment of SE patients. Patients were discharged from hospital with a mean of 2.8 ± 1.0 ASMs after the second SE episode and 2.1 ± 1.2 ASMs after the first episode. Levetiracetam was the most common ASM used before admission and on discharge for SE patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study used the mRS to demonstrate worsened outcomes of patients at consecutive SE episodes. ASM accumulations after subsequent SE episodes were registered over the study period. The study results underline the necessity for improved clinical follow-ups and outpatient care to reduce the health care burden from recurrent SE episodes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339656/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-023-00261-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-023-00261-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多项研究侧重于癫痫状态(SE)患者的药物治疗和预后预测。然而,人们对 SE 的复发性发作还缺乏足够的了解。因此,我们回顾了 SE 的复发情况,以研究复发患者的临床特征和预后:在这项回顾性多中心研究中,我们回顾了德国法兰克福和马尔堡大学医院 2011 年至 2017 年的 SE 复发患者数据。结果:我们发现了 120 例复发性 SE 患者:我们在 80 名患者(占全部 1177 例的 10.2%)中发现了 120 例 SE 复发病例。首次 SE 发作时的平均年龄为 62.2 岁(中位数 66.5;标度 19.3;范围 21-91),其中 42 名患者为男性(52.5%)。第一次发作和第二次发作之间平均相隔 262.4 天。强直-阵挛发作的半身像和脑血管疾病的病因在初次发作和复发中占主导地位。根据修改后的兰金量表(mRS),患者在随后的发作中表现出更严重的残疾,80 名患者中有 9 人在第二次发作中死亡(11.3%)。难治性和超难治性 SE(分别为 RSE 和 SRSE)在第二次发作时有所增加,而在第一次 SE 发作时出现的非难治性 SE(NRSE)并不一定会对随后的非难治性发作起到保护作用。在治疗SE患者的过程中,观察到静脉注射抗癫痫药物(ASM)的使用有所增加。第二次SE发作后,患者出院时平均使用了2.8±1.0种抗癫痫药物,第一次发作后平均使用了2.1±1.2种抗癫痫药物。左乙拉西坦是 SE 患者入院前和出院时最常用的 ASM:这项回顾性多中心研究利用mRS显示了连续SE发作患者的预后恶化情况。在研究期间,记录了SE后续发作后ASM的累积情况。研究结果表明,有必要改善临床随访和门诊护理,以减轻 SE 复发造成的医疗负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent status epilepticus episodes.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent status epilepticus episodes.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent status epilepticus episodes.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent status epilepticus episodes.

Background: Multiple studies have focused on medical and pharmacological treatments and outcome predictors of patients with status epilepticus (SE). However, a sufficient understanding of recurrent episodes of SE is lacking. Therefore, we reviewed recurrent SE episodes to investigate their clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with relapses.

Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we reviewed recurrent SE patient data covering 2011 to 2017 from the university hospitals of Frankfurt and Marburg, Germany. Clinical characteristics and outcome variables were compared among the first and subsequent SE episodes using a standardized form for data collection.

Results: We identified 120 recurrent SE episodes in 80 patients (10.2% of all 1177 episodes). The mean age at the first SE episode was 62.2 years (median 66.5; SD 19.3; range 21-91), and 42 of these patients were male (52.5%). A mean of 262.4 days passed between the first and the second episode. Tonic-clonic seizure semiology and a cerebrovascular disease etiology were predominant in initial and recurrent episodes. After subsequent episodes, patients showed increased disability as indicated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and 9 out of 80 patients died during the second episode (11.3%). Increases in refractory and super-refractory SE (RSE and SRSE, respectively) were noted during the second episode, and the occurrence of a non-refractory SE (NRSE) during the first SE episode did not necessarily provide a protective marker for subsequent non-refractory episodes. An increase in the use of intravenous-available anti-seizure medication (ASM) was observed in the treatment of SE patients. Patients were discharged from hospital with a mean of 2.8 ± 1.0 ASMs after the second SE episode and 2.1 ± 1.2 ASMs after the first episode. Levetiracetam was the most common ASM used before admission and on discharge for SE patients.

Conclusions: This retrospective, multicenter study used the mRS to demonstrate worsened outcomes of patients at consecutive SE episodes. ASM accumulations after subsequent SE episodes were registered over the study period. The study results underline the necessity for improved clinical follow-ups and outpatient care to reduce the health care burden from recurrent SE episodes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信