表征老年人中概率表型算法的亚组表现:痴呆、轻度认知障碍、阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病的案例研究

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Juan M Banda, Nigam H Shah, Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil
{"title":"表征老年人中概率表型算法的亚组表现:痴呆、轻度认知障碍、阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病的案例研究","authors":"Juan M Banda,&nbsp;Nigam H Shah,&nbsp;Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biases within probabilistic electronic phenotyping algorithms are largely unexplored. In this work, we characterize differences in subgroup performance of phenotyping algorithms for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in older adults.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We created an experimental framework to characterize the performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms under different racial distributions allowing us to identify which algorithms may have differential performance, by how much, and under what conditions. We relied on rule-based phenotype definitions as reference to evaluate probabilistic phenotype algorithms created using the Automated PHenotype Routine for Observational Definition, Identification, Training and Evaluation framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate that some algorithms have performance variations anywhere from 3% to 30% for different populations, even when not using race as an input variable. We show that while performance differences in subgroups are not present for all phenotypes, they do affect some phenotypes and groups more disproportionately than others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our analysis establishes the need for a robust evaluation framework for subgroup differences. The underlying patient populations for the algorithms showing subgroup performance differences have great variance between model features when compared with the phenotypes with little to no differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have created a framework to identify systematic differences in the performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms specifically in the context of ADRD as a use case. Differences in subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms are not widespread nor do they occur consistently. This highlights the great need for careful ongoing monitoring to evaluate, measure, and try to mitigate such differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"6 2","pages":"ooad043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/87/ooad043.PMC10307941.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: a case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Juan M Banda,&nbsp;Nigam H Shah,&nbsp;Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biases within probabilistic electronic phenotyping algorithms are largely unexplored. In this work, we characterize differences in subgroup performance of phenotyping algorithms for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in older adults.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We created an experimental framework to characterize the performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms under different racial distributions allowing us to identify which algorithms may have differential performance, by how much, and under what conditions. We relied on rule-based phenotype definitions as reference to evaluate probabilistic phenotype algorithms created using the Automated PHenotype Routine for Observational Definition, Identification, Training and Evaluation framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate that some algorithms have performance variations anywhere from 3% to 30% for different populations, even when not using race as an input variable. We show that while performance differences in subgroups are not present for all phenotypes, they do affect some phenotypes and groups more disproportionately than others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our analysis establishes the need for a robust evaluation framework for subgroup differences. The underlying patient populations for the algorithms showing subgroup performance differences have great variance between model features when compared with the phenotypes with little to no differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have created a framework to identify systematic differences in the performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms specifically in the context of ADRD as a use case. Differences in subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms are not widespread nor do they occur consistently. This highlights the great need for careful ongoing monitoring to evaluate, measure, and try to mitigate such differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"ooad043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/87/ooad043.PMC10307941.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:概率电子表型算法中的偏差在很大程度上尚未被探索。在这项工作中,我们描述了老年人阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)表型算法的亚组表现差异。材料和方法:我们创建了一个实验框架来表征概率表型算法在不同种族分布下的性能,使我们能够确定哪些算法可能具有差异性能,差异程度以及在什么条件下。我们依靠基于规则的表型定义作为参考来评估使用用于观察定义、识别、训练和评估框架的自动表型常规创建的概率表型算法。结果:我们证明,即使在不使用种族作为输入变量的情况下,某些算法在不同人群中的性能变化从3%到30%不等。我们表明,虽然亚组的表现差异并不存在于所有表现型,但它们确实对某些表现型和群体的影响比其他表现型和群体更不成比例。讨论:我们的分析建立了对亚组差异的健全评估框架的需求。与几乎没有差异的表型相比,显示亚组性能差异的算法的潜在患者群体在模型特征之间存在很大差异。结论:我们已经创建了一个框架,以确定概率表型算法性能的系统差异,特别是在ADRD作为用例的背景下。概率表现型算法的亚组表现差异并不普遍,也不一致。这突出表明非常需要进行仔细的持续监测,以评估、度量和尝试减轻这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: a case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: a case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: a case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: a case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Objective: Biases within probabilistic electronic phenotyping algorithms are largely unexplored. In this work, we characterize differences in subgroup performance of phenotyping algorithms for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in older adults.

Materials and methods: We created an experimental framework to characterize the performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms under different racial distributions allowing us to identify which algorithms may have differential performance, by how much, and under what conditions. We relied on rule-based phenotype definitions as reference to evaluate probabilistic phenotype algorithms created using the Automated PHenotype Routine for Observational Definition, Identification, Training and Evaluation framework.

Results: We demonstrate that some algorithms have performance variations anywhere from 3% to 30% for different populations, even when not using race as an input variable. We show that while performance differences in subgroups are not present for all phenotypes, they do affect some phenotypes and groups more disproportionately than others.

Discussion: Our analysis establishes the need for a robust evaluation framework for subgroup differences. The underlying patient populations for the algorithms showing subgroup performance differences have great variance between model features when compared with the phenotypes with little to no differences.

Conclusion: We have created a framework to identify systematic differences in the performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms specifically in the context of ADRD as a use case. Differences in subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotyping algorithms are not widespread nor do they occur consistently. This highlights the great need for careful ongoing monitoring to evaluate, measure, and try to mitigate such differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信