正念帮助和自我照顾模式:在种族平衡的帮助者样本中正念自我照顾和生活质量。

Q3 Medicine
Jason T Hotchkiss, Catherine Cook-Cottone
{"title":"正念帮助和自我照顾模式:在种族平衡的帮助者样本中正念自我照顾和生活质量。","authors":"Jason T Hotchkiss,&nbsp;Catherine Cook-Cottone","doi":"10.17761/2023-D-22-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model and validated the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among three racially balanced samples of helping professionals (n = 1,534). The study employed a cross-sectional, self-report design. The racial representation of participants was American Indian (n = 68), Asian (n = 351), African American (n = 384), Latino (n = 325), White (n = 301), and other (n = 114). The MSCS (33 items) showed good internal structure and measurement invariance to support generalizability across the three groups studied. With parsimony for application development, the Brief-MSCS (24 items) had a stronger internal structure across the three groups. Mindful self-care and secondary traumatic stress mediated the relationship between burnout and compassion satisfaction, as the total effects were greater than the direct effects. Mindful self-care practices were associated with reduced burnout risk. Mediation analysis results supported the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model. The empirical foundation for the 33-item MSCS and 24-item Brief-MSCS is further supported in this study. Both are excellent instruments for measuring mindful self-care factors in helping professionals using a behavioral frequency approach in a weekly time context. The Brief-MSCS is a more concise measure, making it particularly useful for application development. The reliability, construct, and concurrent validity of the MSCS and Brief-MSCS were confirmed. Mind-body practice is self-care; expressions vary by racial group and are associated with overall wellness. Future research should focus on professionals and cultures outside North America.</p>","PeriodicalId":38682,"journal":{"name":"International journal of yoga therapy","volume":"33 2023","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mindful Helping and Self-Care Model: Mindful Self-Care and Quality of Life Among a Racially Balanced Sample of Helping Professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Jason T Hotchkiss,&nbsp;Catherine Cook-Cottone\",\"doi\":\"10.17761/2023-D-22-00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explored the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model and validated the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among three racially balanced samples of helping professionals (n = 1,534). The study employed a cross-sectional, self-report design. The racial representation of participants was American Indian (n = 68), Asian (n = 351), African American (n = 384), Latino (n = 325), White (n = 301), and other (n = 114). The MSCS (33 items) showed good internal structure and measurement invariance to support generalizability across the three groups studied. With parsimony for application development, the Brief-MSCS (24 items) had a stronger internal structure across the three groups. Mindful self-care and secondary traumatic stress mediated the relationship between burnout and compassion satisfaction, as the total effects were greater than the direct effects. Mindful self-care practices were associated with reduced burnout risk. Mediation analysis results supported the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model. The empirical foundation for the 33-item MSCS and 24-item Brief-MSCS is further supported in this study. Both are excellent instruments for measuring mindful self-care factors in helping professionals using a behavioral frequency approach in a weekly time context. The Brief-MSCS is a more concise measure, making it particularly useful for application development. The reliability, construct, and concurrent validity of the MSCS and Brief-MSCS were confirmed. Mind-body practice is self-care; expressions vary by racial group and are associated with overall wellness. Future research should focus on professionals and cultures outside North America.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of yoga therapy\",\"volume\":\"33 2023\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of yoga therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17761/2023-D-22-00001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of yoga therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17761/2023-D-22-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究对正念帮助与自我照顾模型进行了探索,并对正念自我照顾量表(MSCS)在三个种族平衡的助人专业人员样本(n = 1534)中进行了验证。该研究采用了横断面自我报告设计。参与者的种族代表是美洲印第安人(n = 68),亚洲人(n = 351),非洲裔美国人(n = 384),拉丁裔(n = 325),白人(n = 301)和其他(n = 114)。MSCS(33个项目)具有良好的内部结构和测量不变性,支持三组研究的普遍性。由于应用程序开发的简约性,Brief-MSCS(24个项目)在三个组之间具有更强的内部结构。正念自我照顾和继发性创伤应激在职业倦怠和同情满意度之间起中介作用,且总效应大于直接效应。有意识的自我护理实践与降低倦怠风险有关。中介分析结果支持正念帮助和自我照顾模型。本研究进一步支持了33项MSCS和24项Brief-MSCS的实证基础。两者都是很好的工具,用于测量有意识的自我照顾因素,帮助专业人士在每周的时间背景下使用行为频率方法。Brief-MSCS是一种更简洁的度量,使其对应用程序开发特别有用。验证了MSCS和Brief-MSCS的信度、结构和并发效度。身心练习是自我照顾;表达因种族而异,与整体健康有关。未来的研究应该关注北美以外的专业人士和文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Mindful Helping and Self-Care Model: Mindful Self-Care and Quality of Life Among a Racially Balanced Sample of Helping Professionals.

This study explored the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model and validated the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among three racially balanced samples of helping professionals (n = 1,534). The study employed a cross-sectional, self-report design. The racial representation of participants was American Indian (n = 68), Asian (n = 351), African American (n = 384), Latino (n = 325), White (n = 301), and other (n = 114). The MSCS (33 items) showed good internal structure and measurement invariance to support generalizability across the three groups studied. With parsimony for application development, the Brief-MSCS (24 items) had a stronger internal structure across the three groups. Mindful self-care and secondary traumatic stress mediated the relationship between burnout and compassion satisfaction, as the total effects were greater than the direct effects. Mindful self-care practices were associated with reduced burnout risk. Mediation analysis results supported the Mindful Helping and Self-Care model. The empirical foundation for the 33-item MSCS and 24-item Brief-MSCS is further supported in this study. Both are excellent instruments for measuring mindful self-care factors in helping professionals using a behavioral frequency approach in a weekly time context. The Brief-MSCS is a more concise measure, making it particularly useful for application development. The reliability, construct, and concurrent validity of the MSCS and Brief-MSCS were confirmed. Mind-body practice is self-care; expressions vary by racial group and are associated with overall wellness. Future research should focus on professionals and cultures outside North America.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of yoga therapy
International journal of yoga therapy Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信