维持电痉挛期间麻醉改变的影响:异丙酚/艾氯胺酮与甲氧己酮麻醉下癫痫发作质量的纵向比较。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Isabel Methfessel, David Zilles-Wegner, Nils Kunze-Szikszay, Michael Belz
{"title":"维持电痉挛期间麻醉改变的影响:异丙酚/艾氯胺酮与甲氧己酮麻醉下癫痫发作质量的纵向比较。","authors":"Isabel Methfessel,&nbsp;David Zilles-Wegner,&nbsp;Nils Kunze-Szikszay,&nbsp;Michael Belz","doi":"10.1055/a-2058-9010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effectiveness of ECT relies on the induction of a generalized cerebral seizure. Among others, seizure quality (SQ) is potentially influenced by the anesthetic drug used. Commonly used anesthetics comprise barbiturates, etomidate, propofol, and esketamine, with different characteristics and impacts on seizure parameters. So far, no studies have compared the influence of methohexital vs. a combination of propofol/esketamine on established SQ parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal study compared eight established SQ parameters (PSI, ASEI, MSC, midictal amplitude, motor and electroencephalography (EEG) seizure duration, concordance, PHR) before and after the change from propofol/esketamine to methohexital in 34 patients under maintenance ECT. Each patient contributed four measurements, two before and two after the anesthesia change. Anesthesia dose, stimulus dose, electrode placement, and concomitant medication remained unchanged throughout the analyzed treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under methohexital (<i>M</i>=88.97 mg), ASEI (<i>p</i>=0.039 to 0.013) and midictal amplitude (<i>p</i>=0.022 to<0.001) were significantly lower, whereas seizure duration (motor and EEG) was significantly longer when compared to propofol/esketamine (M=64.26 mg/51.18 mg; <i>p</i>=0.012 to<0.001). PSI, MSC, seizure concordance, and PHR were not affected by the anesthetic used.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although to what extent these parameters correlate with the therapeutic effectiveness remains ambiguous, a decision for or against a particular anesthetic could be considered if a specific SQ parameter needs optimization. However, no general superiority for one specific substance or combination was found in this study. In the next step, anesthetic effects on treatment response and tolerability should be focused on.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":"56 4","pages":"141-148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Anesthesia Changes During Maintenance ECT: A Longitudinal Comparison of Seizure Quality Under Anesthesia Using Propofol/Esketamine Versus Methohexital.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Methfessel,&nbsp;David Zilles-Wegner,&nbsp;Nils Kunze-Szikszay,&nbsp;Michael Belz\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2058-9010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effectiveness of ECT relies on the induction of a generalized cerebral seizure. Among others, seizure quality (SQ) is potentially influenced by the anesthetic drug used. Commonly used anesthetics comprise barbiturates, etomidate, propofol, and esketamine, with different characteristics and impacts on seizure parameters. So far, no studies have compared the influence of methohexital vs. a combination of propofol/esketamine on established SQ parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal study compared eight established SQ parameters (PSI, ASEI, MSC, midictal amplitude, motor and electroencephalography (EEG) seizure duration, concordance, PHR) before and after the change from propofol/esketamine to methohexital in 34 patients under maintenance ECT. Each patient contributed four measurements, two before and two after the anesthesia change. Anesthesia dose, stimulus dose, electrode placement, and concomitant medication remained unchanged throughout the analyzed treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under methohexital (<i>M</i>=88.97 mg), ASEI (<i>p</i>=0.039 to 0.013) and midictal amplitude (<i>p</i>=0.022 to<0.001) were significantly lower, whereas seizure duration (motor and EEG) was significantly longer when compared to propofol/esketamine (M=64.26 mg/51.18 mg; <i>p</i>=0.012 to<0.001). PSI, MSC, seizure concordance, and PHR were not affected by the anesthetic used.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although to what extent these parameters correlate with the therapeutic effectiveness remains ambiguous, a decision for or against a particular anesthetic could be considered if a specific SQ parameter needs optimization. However, no general superiority for one specific substance or combination was found in this study. In the next step, anesthetic effects on treatment response and tolerability should be focused on.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacopsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"141-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacopsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2058-9010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2058-9010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:ECT的有效性依赖于全身性大脑发作的诱导。其中,癫痫发作质量(SQ)可能受到所用麻醉药物的影响。常用的麻醉药包括巴比妥类、依托咪酯、异丙酚和艾氯胺酮,它们具有不同的特性和对癫痫发作参数的影响。到目前为止,还没有研究比较甲氧己酮与异丙酚/艾氯胺酮联合使用对既定SQ参数的影响。方法:本回顾性纵向研究比较了34例维持性ECT患者从异丙酚/艾氯胺酮到甲氧己酮转换前后的8个SQ参数(PSI、ASEI、MSC、中间振幅、运动和脑电图(EEG)癫痫发作时间、一致性、PHR)。每位患者进行了四次测量,两次在麻醉改变前,两次在麻醉改变后。麻醉剂量、刺激剂量、电极放置和伴随用药在整个分析治疗过程中保持不变。结果:在甲氧六酮(M=88.97 mg)、ASEI (p=0.039 ~ 0.013)和中间振幅(p=0.022 ~ 0.012)下,尽管这些参数与治疗效果的相关性尚不明确,但如果特定SQ参数需要优化,则可以考虑决定是否使用特定麻醉剂。然而,在这项研究中没有发现一种特定物质或组合的普遍优势。下一步,应重点研究麻醉对治疗反应和耐受性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Anesthesia Changes During Maintenance ECT: A Longitudinal Comparison of Seizure Quality Under Anesthesia Using Propofol/Esketamine Versus Methohexital.

Introduction: The effectiveness of ECT relies on the induction of a generalized cerebral seizure. Among others, seizure quality (SQ) is potentially influenced by the anesthetic drug used. Commonly used anesthetics comprise barbiturates, etomidate, propofol, and esketamine, with different characteristics and impacts on seizure parameters. So far, no studies have compared the influence of methohexital vs. a combination of propofol/esketamine on established SQ parameters.

Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study compared eight established SQ parameters (PSI, ASEI, MSC, midictal amplitude, motor and electroencephalography (EEG) seizure duration, concordance, PHR) before and after the change from propofol/esketamine to methohexital in 34 patients under maintenance ECT. Each patient contributed four measurements, two before and two after the anesthesia change. Anesthesia dose, stimulus dose, electrode placement, and concomitant medication remained unchanged throughout the analyzed treatments.

Results: Under methohexital (M=88.97 mg), ASEI (p=0.039 to 0.013) and midictal amplitude (p=0.022 to<0.001) were significantly lower, whereas seizure duration (motor and EEG) was significantly longer when compared to propofol/esketamine (M=64.26 mg/51.18 mg; p=0.012 to<0.001). PSI, MSC, seizure concordance, and PHR were not affected by the anesthetic used.

Discussion: Although to what extent these parameters correlate with the therapeutic effectiveness remains ambiguous, a decision for or against a particular anesthetic could be considered if a specific SQ parameter needs optimization. However, no general superiority for one specific substance or combination was found in this study. In the next step, anesthetic effects on treatment response and tolerability should be focused on.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacopsychiatry
Pharmacopsychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering advances in the fi eld of psychotropic drugs, Pharmaco psychiatry provides psychiatrists, neuroscientists and clinicians with key clinical insights and describes new avenues of research and treatment. The pharmacological and neurobiological bases of psychiatric disorders are discussed by presenting clinical and experimental research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信