与疼痛药物使用相关的因素以及与下背部和颈部疼痛患者捏脊治疗结果的关系:一项横断面研究

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Corinne R. Minder MChiroMed , Christoph Gorbach DC, MD , Cynthia K. Peterson RN, DC, MMedEd
{"title":"与疼痛药物使用相关的因素以及与下背部和颈部疼痛患者捏脊治疗结果的关系:一项横断面研究","authors":"Corinne R. Minder MChiroMed ,&nbsp;Christoph Gorbach DC, MD ,&nbsp;Cynthia K. Peterson RN, DC, MMedEd","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study objectives were to identify baseline factors associated with pain medication use and determine any differences in chiropractic treatment outcomes in patients with low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) depending on their use of pain medication.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional, prospective outcomes study included 1077 adults with acute or chronic LBP and 845 adults with acute or chronic NP recruited from Swiss chiropractors in their offices within 4 years. Demographic data and the responses to the Patient's Global Impression of Change scale collected at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were analyzed with the χ<sup>2</sup> test. Baseline pain and disability levels were measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry questionnaire for LBP, and Bournemouth questionnaire for patients with NP and analyzed with the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test between the 2 groups. To detect significant predictors of medication use at baseline, logistic regression analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with acute LBP and NP were more likely than those with chronic pain to take pain medication (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP; <em>P</em> = .003 NP). Medication use was more likely with patients with radiculopathy (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP; <em>P</em> = .05 NP) who were smokers (<em>P</em> = .008 LBP; <em>P</em> = .024 NP) and those reporting below-average general health (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP and NP). Pain medication users had higher baseline pain (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP and NP) and disability (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP and NP) scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with LBP and NP had significantly higher pain and disability levels at baseline, tended to have radiculopathy and poor health, were smokers, and presented during the acute phase. However, for this sample of patients, there were no differences in subjective improvement between users and non-users of pain medication for any data collection time point, which has management implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000106/pdfft?md5=45b1baaf5ec582b56b6265890b23f4d6&pid=1-s2.0-S0161475423000106-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated With Pain Medication Use and the Relationship to Chiropractic Treatment Outcomes for Patients With Low Back and Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Corinne R. Minder MChiroMed ,&nbsp;Christoph Gorbach DC, MD ,&nbsp;Cynthia K. Peterson RN, DC, MMedEd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study objectives were to identify baseline factors associated with pain medication use and determine any differences in chiropractic treatment outcomes in patients with low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) depending on their use of pain medication.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional, prospective outcomes study included 1077 adults with acute or chronic LBP and 845 adults with acute or chronic NP recruited from Swiss chiropractors in their offices within 4 years. Demographic data and the responses to the Patient's Global Impression of Change scale collected at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were analyzed with the χ<sup>2</sup> test. Baseline pain and disability levels were measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry questionnaire for LBP, and Bournemouth questionnaire for patients with NP and analyzed with the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test between the 2 groups. To detect significant predictors of medication use at baseline, logistic regression analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with acute LBP and NP were more likely than those with chronic pain to take pain medication (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP; <em>P</em> = .003 NP). Medication use was more likely with patients with radiculopathy (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP; <em>P</em> = .05 NP) who were smokers (<em>P</em> = .008 LBP; <em>P</em> = .024 NP) and those reporting below-average general health (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP and NP). Pain medication users had higher baseline pain (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP and NP) and disability (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 LBP and NP) scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with LBP and NP had significantly higher pain and disability levels at baseline, tended to have radiculopathy and poor health, were smokers, and presented during the acute phase. However, for this sample of patients, there were no differences in subjective improvement between users and non-users of pain medication for any data collection time point, which has management implications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000106/pdfft?md5=45b1baaf5ec582b56b6265890b23f4d6&pid=1-s2.0-S0161475423000106-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的是确定与止痛药使用相关的基线因素,并确定腰痛(LBP)和颈痛(NP)患者的捏脊治疗结果是否存在差异,这取决于他们使用止痛药的情况。方法:这项横断面前瞻性研究包括1077名急性或慢性腰痛患者和845名急性或慢性NP患者,这些患者是在4年内从瑞士的脊医办公室招募的。采用χ2检验对1周、1个月、3个月、6个月和1年收集的人口统计数据和患者对总体变化印象量表的反应进行分析。采用数字评定量表(NRS)测量基线疼痛和残疾水平,采用Oswestry问卷测量腰痛,采用Bournemouth问卷测量NP患者的基线疼痛和残疾水平,并采用Mann-Whitney U检验对两组患者进行分析。为了检测基线时药物使用的显著预测因子,进行了逻辑回归分析。结果急性腰痛和NP患者比慢性疼痛患者更倾向于服用止痛药(P <措施枸杞多糖;P = 0.003 np)。神经根病患者更容易使用药物(P <措施枸杞多糖;P = 0.05 NP)吸烟者(P = 0.008 LBP;P = 0.024 NP)和报告总体健康状况低于平均水平的人(P <.001 LBP和NP)。止痛药使用者有较高的基线疼痛(P <.001 LBP和NP)和残疾(P <.001 LBP和NP)评分。结论LBP和NP患者在基线时疼痛和残疾水平较高,有神经根病倾向,健康状况较差,吸烟,出现在急性期。然而,对于该患者样本,在任何数据收集时间点,使用和不使用止痛药的患者在主观改善方面没有差异,这具有管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Associated With Pain Medication Use and the Relationship to Chiropractic Treatment Outcomes for Patients With Low Back and Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective

The study objectives were to identify baseline factors associated with pain medication use and determine any differences in chiropractic treatment outcomes in patients with low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) depending on their use of pain medication.

Methods

This cross-sectional, prospective outcomes study included 1077 adults with acute or chronic LBP and 845 adults with acute or chronic NP recruited from Swiss chiropractors in their offices within 4 years. Demographic data and the responses to the Patient's Global Impression of Change scale collected at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were analyzed with the χ2 test. Baseline pain and disability levels were measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry questionnaire for LBP, and Bournemouth questionnaire for patients with NP and analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test between the 2 groups. To detect significant predictors of medication use at baseline, logistic regression analysis was performed.

Results

Patients with acute LBP and NP were more likely than those with chronic pain to take pain medication (P < .001 LBP; P = .003 NP). Medication use was more likely with patients with radiculopathy (P < .001 LBP; P = .05 NP) who were smokers (P = .008 LBP; P = .024 NP) and those reporting below-average general health (P < .001 LBP and NP). Pain medication users had higher baseline pain (P < .001 LBP and NP) and disability (P < .001 LBP and NP) scores.

Conclusion

Patients with LBP and NP had significantly higher pain and disability levels at baseline, tended to have radiculopathy and poor health, were smokers, and presented during the acute phase. However, for this sample of patients, there were no differences in subjective improvement between users and non-users of pain medication for any data collection time point, which has management implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信