FAST:评估卫生创新转化为实践和政策的速度的框架。

Enola Proctor, Alex T Ramsey, Lisa Saldana, Thomas M Maddox, David A Chambers, Ross C Brownson
{"title":"FAST:评估卫生创新转化为实践和政策的速度的框架。","authors":"Enola Proctor, Alex T Ramsey, Lisa Saldana, Thomas M Maddox, David A Chambers, Ross C Brownson","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00045-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 17-year time span between discovery and application of evidence in practice has become a unifying challenge for implementation science and translational science more broadly. Further, global pandemics and social crises demand timely implementation of rapidly accruing evidence to reduce morbidity and mortality. Yet speed remains an understudied metric in implementation science. Prevailing evaluations of implementation lack a temporal aspect, and current approaches have not yielded rapid implementation. In this paper, we address speed as an important conceptual and methodological gap in implementation science. We aim to untangle the complexities of studying implementation speed, offer a framework to assess speed of translation (FAST), and provide guidance to measure speed in evaluating implementation. To facilitate specification and reporting on metrics of speed, we encourage consideration of stakeholder perspectives (e.g., comparison of varying priorities), referents (e.g., speed in attaining outcomes, transitioning between implementation phases), and observation windows (e.g., time from intervention development to first patient treated) in its measurement. The FAST framework identifies factors that may influence speed of implementation and potential effects of implementation speed. We propose a research agenda to advance understanding of the pace of implementation, including identifying accelerators and inhibitors to speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"2 2","pages":"107-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FAST: A Framework to Assess Speed of Translation of Health Innovations to Practice and Policy.\",\"authors\":\"Enola Proctor, Alex T Ramsey, Lisa Saldana, Thomas M Maddox, David A Chambers, Ross C Brownson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43477-022-00045-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 17-year time span between discovery and application of evidence in practice has become a unifying challenge for implementation science and translational science more broadly. Further, global pandemics and social crises demand timely implementation of rapidly accruing evidence to reduce morbidity and mortality. Yet speed remains an understudied metric in implementation science. Prevailing evaluations of implementation lack a temporal aspect, and current approaches have not yielded rapid implementation. In this paper, we address speed as an important conceptual and methodological gap in implementation science. We aim to untangle the complexities of studying implementation speed, offer a framework to assess speed of translation (FAST), and provide guidance to measure speed in evaluating implementation. To facilitate specification and reporting on metrics of speed, we encourage consideration of stakeholder perspectives (e.g., comparison of varying priorities), referents (e.g., speed in attaining outcomes, transitioning between implementation phases), and observation windows (e.g., time from intervention development to first patient treated) in its measurement. The FAST framework identifies factors that may influence speed of implementation and potential effects of implementation speed. We propose a research agenda to advance understanding of the pace of implementation, including identifying accelerators and inhibitors to speed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global implementation research and applications\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"107-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161655/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global implementation research and applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00045-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global implementation research and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00045-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

证据在实践中的发现和应用之间的17年时间跨度已成为实施科学和转化科学更广泛的统一挑战。此外,全球流行病和社会危机要求及时落实迅速积累的证据,以降低发病率和死亡率。然而,在实现科学中,速度仍然是一个研究不足的指标。对执行情况的普遍评价缺乏时间方面,目前的做法也没有产生迅速的执行。在本文中,我们将速度视为实现科学中一个重要的概念和方法差距。我们旨在解开研究实施速度的复杂性,提供一个评估翻译速度的框架,并为评估实施速度提供指导。为了促进速度指标的规范和报告,我们鼓励在测量中考虑利益相关者的观点(例如,不同优先事项的比较)、参考因素(例如,实现结果的速度、实施阶段之间的过渡)和观察窗口(例如,从干预发展到第一位患者接受治疗的时间)。FAST框架确定了可能影响实施速度的因素以及实施速度的潜在影响。我们提出了一个研究议程,以促进对实施速度的理解,包括确定加速和抑制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

FAST: A Framework to Assess Speed of Translation of Health Innovations to Practice and Policy.

FAST: A Framework to Assess Speed of Translation of Health Innovations to Practice and Policy.

The 17-year time span between discovery and application of evidence in practice has become a unifying challenge for implementation science and translational science more broadly. Further, global pandemics and social crises demand timely implementation of rapidly accruing evidence to reduce morbidity and mortality. Yet speed remains an understudied metric in implementation science. Prevailing evaluations of implementation lack a temporal aspect, and current approaches have not yielded rapid implementation. In this paper, we address speed as an important conceptual and methodological gap in implementation science. We aim to untangle the complexities of studying implementation speed, offer a framework to assess speed of translation (FAST), and provide guidance to measure speed in evaluating implementation. To facilitate specification and reporting on metrics of speed, we encourage consideration of stakeholder perspectives (e.g., comparison of varying priorities), referents (e.g., speed in attaining outcomes, transitioning between implementation phases), and observation windows (e.g., time from intervention development to first patient treated) in its measurement. The FAST framework identifies factors that may influence speed of implementation and potential effects of implementation speed. We propose a research agenda to advance understanding of the pace of implementation, including identifying accelerators and inhibitors to speed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信