cT2N0直肠癌远端术前放化疗疗效分析。

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Min Young Park, Chang Sik Yu, Tae Won Kim, Jong Hoon Kim, Jin-Hong Park, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim
{"title":"cT2N0直肠癌远端术前放化疗疗效分析。","authors":"Min Young Park,&nbsp;Chang Sik Yu,&nbsp;Tae Won Kim,&nbsp;Jong Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jin-Hong Park,&nbsp;Jong Lyul Lee,&nbsp;Yong Sik Yoon,&nbsp;In Ja Park,&nbsp;Seok-Byung Lim,&nbsp;Jin Cheon Kim","doi":"10.3393/ac.2022.00066.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to determine the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer between January 2008 and December 2016 were included. Patients were divided into PCRT and non-PCRT groups. Non-PCRT patients underwent radical resection or local excision (LE) according to the surgeon's decision, and PCRT patients underwent surgery according to the response to PCRT. Patients received 50.0 to 50.4 gray of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 127 patients enrolled, 46 underwent PCRT and 81 did not. The mean distance of lesions from the anal verge was lower in the PCRT group (P=0.004). The most frequent operation was transanal excision and ultralow anterior resection in the PCRT and non-PCRT groups, respectively. Of the 46 patients who underwent PCRT, 21 (45.7%) achieved pathologic complete response, including 15 of the 24 (62.5%) who underwent LE. Rectal sparing rate was significantly higher in the PCRT group (11.1% vs. 52.2%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in 3- and 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival regardless of PCRT or surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCRT in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer patients increased the rectal sparing rate via LE and showed acceptable oncologic outcomes. PCRT may be a feasible therapeutic option to avoid abdominoperineal resection in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/41/ac-2022-00066-0009.PMC10338167.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Min Young Park,&nbsp;Chang Sik Yu,&nbsp;Tae Won Kim,&nbsp;Jong Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jin-Hong Park,&nbsp;Jong Lyul Lee,&nbsp;Yong Sik Yoon,&nbsp;In Ja Park,&nbsp;Seok-Byung Lim,&nbsp;Jin Cheon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3393/ac.2022.00066.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to determine the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer between January 2008 and December 2016 were included. Patients were divided into PCRT and non-PCRT groups. Non-PCRT patients underwent radical resection or local excision (LE) according to the surgeon's decision, and PCRT patients underwent surgery according to the response to PCRT. Patients received 50.0 to 50.4 gray of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 127 patients enrolled, 46 underwent PCRT and 81 did not. The mean distance of lesions from the anal verge was lower in the PCRT group (P=0.004). The most frequent operation was transanal excision and ultralow anterior resection in the PCRT and non-PCRT groups, respectively. Of the 46 patients who underwent PCRT, 21 (45.7%) achieved pathologic complete response, including 15 of the 24 (62.5%) who underwent LE. Rectal sparing rate was significantly higher in the PCRT group (11.1% vs. 52.2%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in 3- and 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival regardless of PCRT or surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCRT in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer patients increased the rectal sparing rate via LE and showed acceptable oncologic outcomes. PCRT may be a feasible therapeutic option to avoid abdominoperineal resection in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Coloproctology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/41/ac-2022-00066-0009.PMC10338167.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00066.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00066.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定临床T2N0远端直肠癌患者术前放化疗(PCRT)的可行性。方法:纳入2008年1月至2016年12月期间接受T2N0型临床远端直肠癌手术治疗的患者。患者分为PCRT组和非PCRT组。非PCRT患者根据外科医生的决定进行根治性切除或局部切除(LE), PCRT患者根据对PCRT的反应进行手术。术前放疗伴化疗50.0 ~ 50.4 gray。结果:纳入的127例患者中,46例接受了PCRT, 81例未接受。PCRT组病灶距肛门边缘的平均距离较低(P=0.004)。PCRT组和非PCRT组最常见的手术分别是经肛门切除术和超低前切除术。在46例接受PCRT的患者中,21例(45.7%)达到病理完全缓解,包括24例接受LE的15例(62.5%)。PCRT组的直肠保留率显著高于PCRT组(11.1% vs. 52.2%)。结论:PCRT在临床T2N0远端直肠癌患者中通过LE可提高直肠保留率,并显示出可接受的肿瘤预后。PCRT可能是临床T2N0远端直肠癌避免腹会阴切除术的可行治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer.

Efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer.

Efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer.

Efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT2N0 distal rectal cancer.

Purpose: This study was designed to determine the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.

Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer between January 2008 and December 2016 were included. Patients were divided into PCRT and non-PCRT groups. Non-PCRT patients underwent radical resection or local excision (LE) according to the surgeon's decision, and PCRT patients underwent surgery according to the response to PCRT. Patients received 50.0 to 50.4 gray of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy.

Results: Of 127 patients enrolled, 46 underwent PCRT and 81 did not. The mean distance of lesions from the anal verge was lower in the PCRT group (P=0.004). The most frequent operation was transanal excision and ultralow anterior resection in the PCRT and non-PCRT groups, respectively. Of the 46 patients who underwent PCRT, 21 (45.7%) achieved pathologic complete response, including 15 of the 24 (62.5%) who underwent LE. Rectal sparing rate was significantly higher in the PCRT group (11.1% vs. 52.2%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in 3- and 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival regardless of PCRT or surgical procedures.

Conclusion: PCRT in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer patients increased the rectal sparing rate via LE and showed acceptable oncologic outcomes. PCRT may be a feasible therapeutic option to avoid abdominoperineal resection in clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信