Joanny Salvas, Petra Merker, Mike Dingle, Cedric Joossen, Chris Knutsen, David Govezensky, Jim Cannon, Philip Villari, Anthony Cundell, Victoria Navarro, Margit Franz-Riethdorf, Allison Scott
{"title":"了解生物荧光颗粒计数与菌落形成单位的非等效性。","authors":"Joanny Salvas, Petra Merker, Mike Dingle, Cedric Joossen, Chris Knutsen, David Govezensky, Jim Cannon, Philip Villari, Anthony Cundell, Victoria Navarro, Margit Franz-Riethdorf, Allison Scott","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adopting emerging microbiological methods is often desirable because it enables more advantageous, real-time monitoring practices. However, when the newer method measures contamination based on a different detection principle and provides results that are based on different units of measure, a paradigm shift is necessary. That shift can be one of the most difficult challenges in any such project and requires careful consideration. In this article, we explore the challenges presented by the bio-fluorescent particle counting (BFPC) technology, when considering that the traditional colony-forming unit (CFU) is the gold standard that any change is measured against. We examine why attempts to correlate newer units of measure used by biofluorescent particle counters, namely the auto-fluorescent units (AFUs), to the traditional CFUs are not necessarily appropriate. The article explores in depth why there is no consistent correlation factor between the two units of measure, and why that should not be a barrier to fully leveraging, implementing, and using such modern technologies in routine monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"514-518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Non-Equivalency of Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counts versus the Colony-Forming Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Joanny Salvas, Petra Merker, Mike Dingle, Cedric Joossen, Chris Knutsen, David Govezensky, Jim Cannon, Philip Villari, Anthony Cundell, Victoria Navarro, Margit Franz-Riethdorf, Allison Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adopting emerging microbiological methods is often desirable because it enables more advantageous, real-time monitoring practices. However, when the newer method measures contamination based on a different detection principle and provides results that are based on different units of measure, a paradigm shift is necessary. That shift can be one of the most difficult challenges in any such project and requires careful consideration. In this article, we explore the challenges presented by the bio-fluorescent particle counting (BFPC) technology, when considering that the traditional colony-forming unit (CFU) is the gold standard that any change is measured against. We examine why attempts to correlate newer units of measure used by biofluorescent particle counters, namely the auto-fluorescent units (AFUs), to the traditional CFUs are not necessarily appropriate. The article explores in depth why there is no consistent correlation factor between the two units of measure, and why that should not be a barrier to fully leveraging, implementing, and using such modern technologies in routine monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"514-518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the Non-Equivalency of Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counts versus the Colony-Forming Unit.
Adopting emerging microbiological methods is often desirable because it enables more advantageous, real-time monitoring practices. However, when the newer method measures contamination based on a different detection principle and provides results that are based on different units of measure, a paradigm shift is necessary. That shift can be one of the most difficult challenges in any such project and requires careful consideration. In this article, we explore the challenges presented by the bio-fluorescent particle counting (BFPC) technology, when considering that the traditional colony-forming unit (CFU) is the gold standard that any change is measured against. We examine why attempts to correlate newer units of measure used by biofluorescent particle counters, namely the auto-fluorescent units (AFUs), to the traditional CFUs are not necessarily appropriate. The article explores in depth why there is no consistent correlation factor between the two units of measure, and why that should not be a barrier to fully leveraging, implementing, and using such modern technologies in routine monitoring.