解构以能力为基础的教育:对高等教育机构活动、目标和挑战的评估

Howard Lurie, Richard Garrett
{"title":"解构以能力为基础的教育:对高等教育机构活动、目标和挑战的评估","authors":"Howard Lurie,&nbsp;Richard Garrett","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There have been several surveys assessing institutional interest in Competency-Based Education (CBE), but there is a need for a systematic analysis of how institutions are designing and implementing CBE at the course, program, or institutional level. This initiative proposes to close this research gap and advance the conversation about the scale, impact, and varieties of CBE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eduventures, an independent higher education research and advisory firm, surveyed institutional leaders and other informed stakeholders on details about the strategies and operations involving CBE at their institutions. The resulting sample includes 251 institutions from across higher education and represents one of the largest samples to date on CBE implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A portrait of CBE emerges as a menu of tools and practices, rather than a monolithic approach or linear path. These findings underscore the need for institutions to carefully weigh the pros and cons of CBE implementation and to proactively select the CBE components that make the most sense for their students and mission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While interest in CBE is stronger than ever before, it remains a complex innovation. CBE is not simply a delivery mode. It challenges long-held conventions regarding how curricula are created, instruction is designed and delivered, and skills and knowledge are assessed. The diversity and complexity of CBE requires customized implementation, and near-term opportunities to accelerate the growth and expand the scale of CBE beyond a set of innovative early adopters may be limited. This complexity emphasizes the merits of a richer array of CBE implementation examples.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1047","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deconstructing competency-based education: An assessment of institutional activity, goals, and challenges in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Howard Lurie,&nbsp;Richard Garrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cbe2.1047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>There have been several surveys assessing institutional interest in Competency-Based Education (CBE), but there is a need for a systematic analysis of how institutions are designing and implementing CBE at the course, program, or institutional level. This initiative proposes to close this research gap and advance the conversation about the scale, impact, and varieties of CBE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eduventures, an independent higher education research and advisory firm, surveyed institutional leaders and other informed stakeholders on details about the strategies and operations involving CBE at their institutions. The resulting sample includes 251 institutions from across higher education and represents one of the largest samples to date on CBE implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A portrait of CBE emerges as a menu of tools and practices, rather than a monolithic approach or linear path. These findings underscore the need for institutions to carefully weigh the pros and cons of CBE implementation and to proactively select the CBE components that make the most sense for their students and mission.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While interest in CBE is stronger than ever before, it remains a complex innovation. CBE is not simply a delivery mode. It challenges long-held conventions regarding how curricula are created, instruction is designed and delivered, and skills and knowledge are assessed. The diversity and complexity of CBE requires customized implementation, and near-term opportunities to accelerate the growth and expand the scale of CBE beyond a set of innovative early adopters may be limited. This complexity emphasizes the merits of a richer array of CBE implementation examples.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1047\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

已有几项调查评估了机构对能力本位教育(CBE)的兴趣,但需要对机构如何在课程、项目或机构层面设计和实施能力本位教育进行系统分析。该倡议旨在缩小这一研究差距,并推动有关CBE的规模、影响和种类的讨论。方法Eduventures是一家独立的高等教育研究和咨询公司,调查了机构领导人和其他知情的利益相关者,了解他们机构涉及CBE的战略和运营细节。结果样本包括来自高等教育领域的251所机构,是迄今为止关于CBE实施的最大样本之一。结果CBE的肖像呈现为工具和实践的菜单,而不是单一的方法或线性路径。这些发现强调了机构需要仔细权衡实施CBE的利弊,并主动选择对学生和使命最有意义的CBE组成部分。尽管人们对CBE的兴趣比以往任何时候都强烈,但它仍然是一项复杂的创新。CBE不仅仅是一种交付模式。它挑战了长期以来关于课程如何创建、教学如何设计和交付以及技能和知识如何评估的传统。CBE的多样性和复杂性需要定制化的实现,并且在一组创新的早期采用者之外加速CBE的增长和扩展规模的近期机会可能是有限的。这种复杂性强调了丰富的CBE实现示例数组的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deconstructing competency-based education: An assessment of institutional activity, goals, and challenges in higher education

Deconstructing competency-based education: An assessment of institutional activity, goals, and challenges in higher education

Background

There have been several surveys assessing institutional interest in Competency-Based Education (CBE), but there is a need for a systematic analysis of how institutions are designing and implementing CBE at the course, program, or institutional level. This initiative proposes to close this research gap and advance the conversation about the scale, impact, and varieties of CBE.

Methods

Eduventures, an independent higher education research and advisory firm, surveyed institutional leaders and other informed stakeholders on details about the strategies and operations involving CBE at their institutions. The resulting sample includes 251 institutions from across higher education and represents one of the largest samples to date on CBE implementation.

Results

A portrait of CBE emerges as a menu of tools and practices, rather than a monolithic approach or linear path. These findings underscore the need for institutions to carefully weigh the pros and cons of CBE implementation and to proactively select the CBE components that make the most sense for their students and mission.

Conclusion

While interest in CBE is stronger than ever before, it remains a complex innovation. CBE is not simply a delivery mode. It challenges long-held conventions regarding how curricula are created, instruction is designed and delivered, and skills and knowledge are assessed. The diversity and complexity of CBE requires customized implementation, and near-term opportunities to accelerate the growth and expand the scale of CBE beyond a set of innovative early adopters may be limited. This complexity emphasizes the merits of a richer array of CBE implementation examples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信