大麻政策自由化与酒精使用和与大麻共同使用的关系:叙述审查。

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Rosanna Smart, Marlene C Lira, Seema Choksy Pessar, Jason G Blanchette, Timothy S Naimi
{"title":"大麻政策自由化与酒精使用和与大麻共同使用的关系:叙述审查。","authors":"Rosalie Liccardo Pacula,&nbsp;Rosanna Smart,&nbsp;Marlene C Lira,&nbsp;Seema Choksy Pessar,&nbsp;Jason G Blanchette,&nbsp;Timothy S Naimi","doi":"10.35946/arcr.v42.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The liberalization of cannabis policies has the potential to affect the use of other substances and the harms from using them, particularly alcohol. Although a previous review of this literature found conflicting results regarding the relationship between cannabis policy and alcohol-related outcomes, cannabis policies have continued to evolve rapidly in the years since that review.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>The authors conducted a narrative review of studies published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, that assessed the effects of cannabis policies on the use of alcohol in the United States or Canada.</p><p><strong>Search results: </strong>The initial search identified 3,446 unique monographs. Of these, 23 met all inclusion criteria and were included in the review, and five captured simultaneous or concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Associations between cannabis policy liberalization and alcohol use, alcohol-related outcomes, and the co-use of alcohol and cannabis were inconclusive, with studies finding positive associations, no associations, and negative associations. Although several studies found that cannabis policy liberalization was associated with decreases in alcohol use measures, these same studies showed no impact of the cannabis policy on cannabis use itself. The lack of a consistent association was robust to subject age, outcome measure (e.g., use, medical utilization, driving), and type of cannabis policy; however, this may be due to the small number of studies for each type of outcome. This paper discusses several notable limitations of the evidence base and offers suggestions for improving consistency and comparability of research going forward, including a stronger classification of cannabis policy, inclusion of measures of the alcohol policy environment, verification of the impact of cannabis policy on cannabis use, and consideration of mediation effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7736,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol Research : Current Reviews","volume":"42 1","pages":"06"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936161/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships of Cannabis Policy Liberalization With Alcohol Use and Co-Use With Cannabis: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rosalie Liccardo Pacula,&nbsp;Rosanna Smart,&nbsp;Marlene C Lira,&nbsp;Seema Choksy Pessar,&nbsp;Jason G Blanchette,&nbsp;Timothy S Naimi\",\"doi\":\"10.35946/arcr.v42.1.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The liberalization of cannabis policies has the potential to affect the use of other substances and the harms from using them, particularly alcohol. Although a previous review of this literature found conflicting results regarding the relationship between cannabis policy and alcohol-related outcomes, cannabis policies have continued to evolve rapidly in the years since that review.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>The authors conducted a narrative review of studies published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, that assessed the effects of cannabis policies on the use of alcohol in the United States or Canada.</p><p><strong>Search results: </strong>The initial search identified 3,446 unique monographs. Of these, 23 met all inclusion criteria and were included in the review, and five captured simultaneous or concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Associations between cannabis policy liberalization and alcohol use, alcohol-related outcomes, and the co-use of alcohol and cannabis were inconclusive, with studies finding positive associations, no associations, and negative associations. Although several studies found that cannabis policy liberalization was associated with decreases in alcohol use measures, these same studies showed no impact of the cannabis policy on cannabis use itself. The lack of a consistent association was robust to subject age, outcome measure (e.g., use, medical utilization, driving), and type of cannabis policy; however, this may be due to the small number of studies for each type of outcome. This paper discusses several notable limitations of the evidence base and offers suggestions for improving consistency and comparability of research going forward, including a stronger classification of cannabis policy, inclusion of measures of the alcohol policy environment, verification of the impact of cannabis policy on cannabis use, and consideration of mediation effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol Research : Current Reviews\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"06\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936161/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol Research : Current Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v42.1.06\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol Research : Current Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v42.1.06","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:大麻政策的自由化有可能影响到其他物质的使用及其危害,特别是酒精。尽管先前对这一文献的审查发现,关于大麻政策与酒精相关后果之间关系的结果相互矛盾,但自那次审查以来,大麻政策继续迅速发展。检索方法:作者对2015年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间发表的研究进行了叙述性回顾,这些研究评估了大麻政策对美国或加拿大酒精使用的影响。搜索结果:最初的搜索确定了3,446个独特的专著。其中23人符合所有纳入标准并列入审查,5人同时或同时使用酒精和大麻。讨论和结论:大麻政策自由化与酒精使用、酒精相关后果以及酒精和大麻共同使用之间的关联尚无定论,研究发现有积极关联、无关联和消极关联。虽然几项研究发现,大麻政策自由化与减少酒精使用措施有关,但这些研究表明,大麻政策对大麻使用本身没有影响。缺乏一致的关联与受试者年龄、结果测量(例如,使用、医疗利用、驾驶)和大麻政策类型有关;然而,这可能是由于每种结果的研究数量较少。本文讨论了证据基础的几个显著局限性,并为今后提高研究的一致性和可比性提出了建议,包括对大麻政策进行更严格的分类,纳入酒精政策环境措施,验证大麻政策对大麻使用的影响,以及考虑中介效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relationships of Cannabis Policy Liberalization With Alcohol Use and Co-Use With Cannabis: A Narrative Review.

Relationships of Cannabis Policy Liberalization With Alcohol Use and Co-Use With Cannabis: A Narrative Review.

Relationships of Cannabis Policy Liberalization With Alcohol Use and Co-Use With Cannabis: A Narrative Review.

Purpose: The liberalization of cannabis policies has the potential to affect the use of other substances and the harms from using them, particularly alcohol. Although a previous review of this literature found conflicting results regarding the relationship between cannabis policy and alcohol-related outcomes, cannabis policies have continued to evolve rapidly in the years since that review.

Search methods: The authors conducted a narrative review of studies published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, that assessed the effects of cannabis policies on the use of alcohol in the United States or Canada.

Search results: The initial search identified 3,446 unique monographs. Of these, 23 met all inclusion criteria and were included in the review, and five captured simultaneous or concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis.

Discussion and conclusions: Associations between cannabis policy liberalization and alcohol use, alcohol-related outcomes, and the co-use of alcohol and cannabis were inconclusive, with studies finding positive associations, no associations, and negative associations. Although several studies found that cannabis policy liberalization was associated with decreases in alcohol use measures, these same studies showed no impact of the cannabis policy on cannabis use itself. The lack of a consistent association was robust to subject age, outcome measure (e.g., use, medical utilization, driving), and type of cannabis policy; however, this may be due to the small number of studies for each type of outcome. This paper discusses several notable limitations of the evidence base and offers suggestions for improving consistency and comparability of research going forward, including a stronger classification of cannabis policy, inclusion of measures of the alcohol policy environment, verification of the impact of cannabis policy on cannabis use, and consideration of mediation effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
1.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Alcohol Research: Current Reviews (ARCR) is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal published by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) at the National Institutes of Health. Starting from 2020, ARCR follows a continuous, rolling publication model, releasing one virtual issue per yearly volume. The journal offers free online access to its articles without subscription or pay-per-view fees. Readers can explore the content of the current volume, and past volumes are accessible in the journal's archive. ARCR's content, including previous titles, is indexed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信